Ephera ( @Ephera@lemmy.ml ) 35•3 months agoYou know, I went into this article kind of on the side of the game publishers, but this argumentation just had me rolling:
major developers like Microsoft, Sony, and Epic Games are pushing back, arguing their creations are protected forms of artistic expression, not addictive products.
Their CEOs do nothing but respond to stakeholders all year long, but now all of a sudden, they put on their beret hats and go excusez-moi, this is artistique.
Ranvier ( @Ranvier@sopuli.xyz ) 18•3 months agoThese loot boxes are merely a highly artistic statement on the uncertainties in life and a run away capalitalistic society! We are as shocked as anyone that people have got addicted and lost thousands of dollars to our uhhhhh art, yeah.
- shiveyarbles ( @shiveyarbles@beehaw.org ) 12•3 months ago
The big issue to me is that the pricing of digital items is completely unrelated to the cost of creation. And it targets children who don’t know better.
Paradachshund ( @Paradachshund@lemmy.today ) 10•3 months agoDark patterns are bad, and I think they should be discouraged somehow. It has nothing to do with entertainment.
sacredbirdman ( @sacredbirdman@kbin.social ) 5•3 months agoLet’s see if we can get a legal precedent that addictive = entertaining. That could have “interesting” ramifications. (For the record, I don’t agree at all that they’re the same thing)