Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
floofloof ( floofloof@lemmy.ca )  to Free and Open Source SoftwareEnglish · 3 years ago

Bullying in Open Source Software Is a Massive Security Vulnerability

www.404media.co

external-link
message-square
8
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • opensource@lemmy.ml
106
external-link

Bullying in Open Source Software Is a Massive Security Vulnerability

www.404media.co

floofloof ( floofloof@lemmy.ca )  to Free and Open Source SoftwareEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
8
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • opensource@lemmy.ml
The Xz backdoor and a near miss on the F-Droid app store show how the entitled attitude of some people in the open source community can be used to push malicious or insecure code.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Pyro ( Pyro@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 years ago

    The insinuation of “merge now otherwise you are letting your users down” in the F-Droid PR is so sickening. I can’t imagine talking like that to people who voluntarily put their time and effort into a FOSS project.

  • mozz ( mozz@mbin.grits.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 years ago

    I think one of the worst things that happened to internet culture was when “I’m a fellow nerd and I am happy if you made me some free nerd stuff, thank you” got replaced with “I’m a customer and you are making a product for me” mentality. It’s like someone is doing you a favor by joining your Lemmy instance, or running your free software, and it gives you the right to complain to them and demand features or things you want, and you’ll threaten to leave and not bless them with your presence anymore if you don’t.

    I see this all the time with Lemmy: People pressuring the devs to do some thing in some particular manner, and them constantly explaining “hey, our time’s not unlimited and we have a large number of priorities, we’ll get to it when we get to it, if you feel strongly about it please do it yourself or hire someone” which is 100% reasonable, and then for some reason that’s a problem.

    • Unsustainable ( Unsustainable@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I couldn’t agree more. I’m part of a hobby community keeping an old OS going and I see people come in and complain as if this were a new OS that they just paid money for, and almost demanding that something they want be done immediately. It frustrates me, and I’m not even one of the people maintaining it. I’m just an enthusiast supporting the project.

  • eveninghere ( eveninghere@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t like Lemmy’s stance on mod features, but I still don’t appreciate people who stress devs to add features because users are the most important.

    It should instead be we will not use your software otherwise.

    • Nutomic ( nutomic@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      What is this “stance on mod features” that you are talking about?

      • ag_roberston_author ( ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        Probably the ones outlined here, which you should be aware of, given there are statements from you included in the article: https://docs.beehaw.org/docs/important-questions-decisions-and-reflections/beehaw-lemmy-and-a-vision-of-the-fediverse/

        • Nutomic ( nutomic@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          I dont have time to read all that. The problem with Beehaw is that the admins are extremely entitled, as if we had some obligation to work for them for free. Similar to what is described in OP.

          However we are consistently improving the mod tools, and accept contributions in that area. You can see in the dev updates.

  • davehtaylor ( davehtaylor@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • spider ( spider@lemmy.nz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • smeg ( smeg@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • blusterydayve26 ( blusterydayve26@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      That used to be the dream: corps hired you to work on the thing they needed that you were good at. Now, though, they just want everything for free and just acquihire to reassign you to whatever makes more money.

      • smeg ( smeg@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        deleted by creator

Free and Open Source Software

foss

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !foss@beehaw.org

If it’s free and open source and it’s also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 108 users / day
  • 209 users / week
  • 587 users / month
  • 1.86K users / 6 months
  • 3.47K local subscribers
  • 23.1K subscribers
  • 1.29K Posts
  • 16.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Gaywallet (they/it) ( Gaywallet@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code