Beeper is (finally) out of beta. No more waitlist! Download the app today – it’s free.
  •  Derin   ( @derin@lemmy.beru.co ) 
    86•1 month ago

    There’s a lot of FUD in this comments section, so I’d like to clear the air. I’m pretty big on OSS myself, so it pains me to see a company doing all the right things get lambasted like this.

    Beeper is just a Matrix server running in tandem with a series of custom, open source bridges written by Beeper. The value proposition is not having to deploy a Matrix server yourself, and not having to deploy each bridge yourself.

    However, if you want to do that you absolutely can. I’ve been running Synapse + a subset of their bridges for a couple years now (the WhatsApp one being the oldest), and they are fantastic.

    The devs contribute back to Matrix all the time and are great about supporting the spec as a responsible third party.

    Their only closed source software is their client, which is - by definition - only written to work with their servers and not generic Matrix servers (e.g. It’s just a preconfigured matrix client which expects each bridge to be deployed, and doesn’t ask you for things like what server you want). As a result, you wouldn’t want to use it with your own stack; you can just pick one of the myriad OSS clients available for Matrix and go with that. I use SchildiChat, for example.

    I don’t understand why, after doing all this work and publishing the source online for free (free as in freedom), they aren’t allowed to offer a preconfigured service to non tech savvy folk?

    Honest question: Shouldn’t they be paid for their work?

    Edit: And, please, stop asking questions like “How do they connect to X/Y/Z, anyway?” - just go read the source and see for yourself. These are the good guys working completely in the open, and you’re treating them as if Twitter just wrote a chat app.

    •  jarfil   ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
      20•1 month ago

      Not sure there is much FUD, let me see if I can sum up the points:

      • Beeper devs have written a bunch of bridges between Matrix and other services. ✅ Cool
      • They’ve contributed to Matrix. ✅ Cool
      • End-to-end encryption, ends at each bridge server, which needs to decrypt and re-encrypt every message (¹). ❌ Not cool
      • They’re OpenSource, so anyone can self-host their own bridge. ✅ That’s cool… but contrary to the “value proposition” of not having to do so 🤷
      • Encryption in anything closed source, like their client, is ❌ not cool… but you can use a different client, so 🤷
      • Decryption on not-selfhosted servers, is ❌ not cool… but you can self-host them, so 🤷
      • All clients come “preconfigured” for some service 🤷, but theirs is locked to a service. ❌ Not cool
      • People using a client with E2EE, get that expectation broken by Beeper (client) users giving their keys to a bridge hosted by a 3rd party. ❌ Not cool
      • FUD: The devs’ monetization strategy isn’t clear. (“premium features” in the client? 🧐)

      TL;DR: Sounds like a reasonable way to move unencrypted messages around… but falls short of fixing the problem of having secure interoperable E2EE.

      Should they get paid for it? Probably, if you find that useful.

      (¹: if there is any bridge capable of forwarding encrypted messages without decrypting, please correct me)

      •  Derin   ( @derin@lemmy.beru.co ) 
        4•1 month ago

        The not cool parts just relate to any sort of hosted bridge. If you don’t trust them with decrypting messages on their end, then don’t give them your data - there are no bridges capable of doing that, anywhere.

        So it really comes down to “trust someone else with your data, or host it yourself”; and if you’re - understandably - frustrated with those options blame companies like WhatsApp or Discord that make it nigh impossible to integrate their services with outside networks.

        Functionally, these bridges just forward your content to a library acting like a headless client - there’s no way to encrypt that as the reverse engineered clients are not libraries and need to take raw input. You can’t end to end encrypt it as the client is one of the “ends”.

        As an example, the WhatsApp bridge uses WhatsApp web as a backend, and has all the limitations of WA web.

        As a result, I find the expectations to be a bit unrealistic.

      •  flashgnash   ( @flashgnash@lemm.ee ) 
        2•1 month ago

        Does the whole encryption/decryption thing still bother you if you self host?

        I tried out the app, the value there is that it’s ready to go straight away, though I took it all down again because my messages being unencrypted on someone else’s server makes me uneasy. May end up self hosting it for that reason and not using anything closed source

        •  jarfil   ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
          3•1 month ago

          Somewhat. It’s kind of a gradation:

          • 3rd party servers, or closed source, no trust.
          • Self-hosting on a hosting provider… it’s not my hardware, but maybe some trust.
          • OpenSource with non-reproducible builds, even self-hosted at home, little trust.
          • Local bridges, OpenSource, with reproducible builds, and a 3rd party audit, most trust.

          All software can have bugs, and we’ve seen what cases like xz-util can bring, so I would rather have no decrypting bridges at all, particularly for sensitive information… but for random private chats, “mostly trusted” sounds like enough.

          Public conversations (like this one) are fine going through random bridges, but I feel like bridging with E2EE networks, is subverting user expectations.

    •  Kissaki   ( @Kissaki@beehaw.org ) English
      4•1 month ago

      Seems like they did good until now. I’m not confident, even skeptical, that will keep going after the acquisition though.

      Gravatar was a great, independent, minimal service. Now it’s a horrendous, bloated service.

  •  jherazob   ( @jherazob@beehaw.org ) English
    29•1 month ago

    Bought by Automattic? After they non-consensually took all of Tumblr and hosted Wordpress to train AI? And after their big boss revealed his transphobia? I guess i’ll skip this one

  •  drkt   ( @drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    10•1 month ago

    How is beeper reading my Discord DMs without breaching Discord TOS?

    e: Their ToS and privacy clauses are way too opaque for something that’s not open source. No from me, Ma’am.

  •  RBG   ( @RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    9•1 month ago

    Alright, I got to ask. Having one app for all these services sounds great. I remember some drama around it though, don’t recall the details. So what am I missing, is this actually good news?

    Its not open source but neither are most of the apps it connects to.

    Edit: Found a comment in another thread that sums up valid concerns https://feddit.nl/comment/8763492

    •  Derin   ( @derin@lemmy.beru.co ) 
      13•1 month ago

      Not closed source. It’s just a Matrix server instance running their own bridges. All the backend stuff is open source, the only closed source part is their client.

      The client is specific to their site and unnecessary: just deploy Synapse, then pick and deploy the bridges of their suite you want to your server. You can then pick and use any of the available Matrix clients to get the same exact features. You can even sponsor them on Github, as I’ve been doing for months.

      •  onlinepersona   ( @onlinepersona@programming.dev ) English
        9•1 month ago

        the only closed source part is their client.

        Which is exactly what I’m referring to. Plus, they can say they run a matrix server, but if your frontend is closed source, there’s no way I trust that they actually do run a fully opensource backend. Wouldn’t surprise me one bit to hear/read that they have closed source components in the backend too. Big nope from me.

        Anti Commercial AI thingy

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        •  Derin   ( @derin@lemmy.beru.co ) 
          9•1 month ago

          You can use any Matrix client with Beeper, you don’t have to use theirs.

          Regardless, there’s nothing stopping you from recreating the same stack using the available tools.

          What makes their service unique are the bridges. Download their sources, compile them, and then pair them with any server client combo you want.

          If you insist on using their stack, you can still use an OSS client. They chose not to make their client open source as it is, by design, for their service only.

          They’re trying to run a business aimed at people who don’t care about open source, and want the same closed source experience they get from their other chat apps but with inter connectivity between third party services.

          If you want the latter without any closed source code, you can just go and do that. They’ve released all the important parts.

          Edit: Here’s a guide to self hosting beeper.

          •  shrugal   ( @shrugal@lemm.ee ) 
            3•1 month ago

            What is this “closed source experience” you are talking about? How would making the client open source hinder that in any way, especially when their stated goal is to earn money with premium features instead of the app itself?!

            Imo being open source is a VERY big deal for an e2e encrypted chat client! I don’t really care whether most of their stack is open if the app I’m actually using to type and encrypt my messages is not. This makes the whole thing look like a trick, pretending to be open when key parts are not.

            •  jarfil   ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
              3•1 month ago

              What is this “closed source experience”

              I can answer that: it’s the “I don’t care about security as long as I can send memes and inappropriate messages to most people” experience.

              From the looks of it, it’s as secure as having WhatsApp/Signal/Telegram/ProtonMail doing “E2EE” through each app’s servers, and never knowing whether the client did the encryption right, or if it sent the keys to the server for messages to get intercepted… well, except you do know that the bridges are decrypting all messages anyway.

              •  shrugal   ( @shrugal@lemm.ee ) 
                1•1 month ago

                I can answer that: it’s the “I don’t care about security as long as I can send memes and inappropriate messages to most people” experience.

                Closed source doesn’t help with that though, you don’t have to care about privacy in open source.

                except you do know that the bridges are decrypting all messages anyway

                They are working on on-device bridges that preserve e2ee, but making the client closed source kind of defeats the purpose here.

                •  jarfil   ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 
                  1•1 month ago

                  Closed source helps with the second part, the connecting with a majority of people using the same closed source platform (then different people use different platforms, which is where we are now… but the DMA might solve that).

                  On-device bridges could be nice if they included that in the OpenSource part.

                •  Derin   ( @derin@lemmy.beru.co ) 
                  2•1 month ago

                  I disagree. Beeper’s client is meaningless, it’s the service being offered that has value.

                  If you don’t mind trusting a third party service with your Matrix instance + bridge hosting, use Beeper.

                  If you’re into OSS and owning your own tech stack, self host the whole thing.

                  At no point do you have to use their client for any reason.

        •  flashgnash   ( @flashgnash@lemm.ee ) 
          2•1 month ago

          Given it’s all entirely self host able if you use a different client I’m not sure how they could be

          Unless there’s some binary blobs hidden in the repo but you’d think someone would have pointed that out by now

    •  Derin   ( @derin@lemmy.beru.co ) 
      23•1 month ago

      It’s not proprietary, lol. You can download and deploy each of their bridges yourself to your own servers.

      Source: been using their WhatsApp, Discord, and Signal bridges for over a year. I use Github sponsors to pay for development, as I appreciate how great they are.

      The only closed source part of their stack is their client, which you don’t have to use.

      Also, they’re some of the most prolific contributors to Matrix outside of Element. The emoji picker in Element was literally PR’ed by Tulir.

      Love it when folk see people trying to make money off OSS and immediately resort to hysterics. It really makes closed source development look appealing if you’re going to be damned by idealogues regardless of whether you release the source or not.

  •  starman   ( @starman@programming.dev ) English
    5•1 month ago
    • Discord? Not working (probably because of TOTP)
    • Facebook Messenger? Not working (probably because I use it without Facebook account)
    • SMS/RCS? Not working (looks like it requires Google account)

    Seems like it’s not ready yet