•  akrz   ( @akrz@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    453 months ago

    Rowan Gavin Paton Menzies (14 August 1937 – 12 April 2020)[1][2][3] was a British submarine lieutenant-commander who authored books claiming that the Chinese sailed to America before Columbus. Historians have rejected Menzies’ theories and assertions[4][5][6][7][8]: 367–372  and have categorised his work as pseudohistory.[9][10][11]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Menzies

    • Hasn’t it been proven that eastern polynesians have amerindian DNA, and also that their word for their crops of sweet potatoes is related to the Quechua word for similar crops still in south america?

      •  1rre   ( @1rre@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah in 1200-1300 not 700AD, but there is some evidence of eariler voyages to South America and Antarctica

        Also the DNA is the other way around and also a coin flip as to whether it came from Madagascan slaves after the slave trade or from Polynesians hundreds of years earlier, and the sweet potato is also not hard evidence as it could be coincidence, and there is some evidence of it having spread earlier

        However oral history is quite strong in Polynesia and for whatever reason there’s no stories of large landmasses to the east, only icy ones to the south

        Essentially there’s no hard proof like there is with Leif Erikson and Columbus as it was at most a couple of accidental crossings which may not have even been return journeys, but there is a lot of evidence that suggests there was contact of some sort or another

        • IIRC the oral history could be explained, in that the folks on Rapa Nui were actually not the ones sailing to South America, it was actually the other way around.

          Were that the case then South America wouldn’t necessarily be documented in an oral history, just visitors from a far away land.

    • Oddly enough it seems the same is true for Mansa’s trip. Except that as regent, he gave himself the funding, twice.

      However, as wikipedia notes: ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_voyage_of_the_predecessor_of_Mansa_Musa )

      1. No african artifacts have ever been discovered in South or Central America.
      2. Only one of the ships returned, and it only reported the existence of the “Canary Current” which that ship did not enter.

      In addition. The dark skin of some South Americans is genetically distant to modern Africans, but has ties to the same markers in some asian cultures, implying its addition was prehistoric and happened in the old world.

    •  PhlubbaDubba   ( @PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not incorrect measurements of the earth’s circumference, rather he used incorrect maps that showed Asia as being like 4 times bigger than it actually is, with the Polynesian islands and Japan being a continent sized chain, each at minimum the size of Sardinia

      The reason people think he was using an incorrect circumference is because one of his journal entries can be read to either say he was close to mount purgatory, which would have been super far from where he’d have been, or that he believed he was heading in that direction, which to be fair he actually would have been had the mountain existed.

      I forget who but someone put it like this, if you asked Columbus for what continent he was on, he’d have been wrong, but if you asked for his coordinates on the earth’s surface, he’d have actually been pretty close to accurate.

      He knew “where” he was, he just didn’t know where that where was.

    •  Liz   ( @Liz@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      Bruh, it’s because Columbus kicked off the age of colonization that led to the modern world. All other claims to the first discovery are either the initial settlement or largely inconsequential meetings between worlds.

      •  Umbrias   ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Columbus did not in fact do that, nor is that “the reason” the modern world exists. Broken window fallacy, slaughtering people and generally doing colonialism is not an effective way to create technological progress.

        •  Liz   ( @Liz@midwest.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Sooorrrrta, extracting huge piles of wealth off the backs of your colonies is actually a decent way to up the standard of living back home and free up people for higher-tech.

          That’s not actually what I was arguing though, I was just pointing out that that’s the obvious moment that completely changed the fate of the Americas, Europe, and Africa. None of those other contact events had any particular impact on the world. Colombus and the colonial era absolutely did. Good or bad wasn’t really my point.

          •  Umbrias   ( @Umbrias@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            In doing so you sacrifice the wealth and progress of the people you are colonializing. Like I said, broken window fallacy. Slaughtering while cultures doesn’t actually as a rule lead to an increase in human wealth or progress towards this future.

            And "great person"ing Columbus who was more a bumbling symptom of the colonialist sentiment that already existed is silly. There would have been colonization without him. He’s just the face that got to start genocides for Spain in the Americas first.

            •  Liz   ( @Liz@midwest.social ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago
              1. I’m not the person down voting you, just FYI.

              2. Again, I didn’t say this was good, only that it’s an obvious turning point in history that lead to the modern world. It wasn’t inevitable that we got here from there, but we did, so that’s the obvious start.