I’m sure they are working on a youtube messaging app behind the scenes.

  •  Arelin   ( @Arelin@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    657 months ago

    finally

    This article is just a youtube premium ad 🤢

    As far as what you get when you go Premium, you won’t see any more ads within the app or the videos that you’re watching. Plus, you’ll gain access to background play, along with being able to download videos on the go. And perhaps what makes this plan even more worthwhile is that you get access to YouTube Music, which features over 100 million commercial free songs. Now, the one drawback is that these features don’t come for free, with a subscription costing $13.99 per month in the US.

    •  underisk   ( @underisk@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      197 months ago

      Video is nearly impossible to host in a sustainable way. The bandwidth usage is among the most expensive things you can host. The only way you’re getting something better than YouTube is if it’s tax funded somehow.

        • 20 mbps may be child’s play, not often for download only, not upload, and then don’t forget that just a hundred viewers will generate 2 gbps of traffic. And hundred viewers are nothing.

          Sure, most videos are not 4k. The bandwidth usage still goes up pretty quick.

          I think PeerTube’s idea that viewers of the same video can serve each other is an interesting concept. Problem is, afaik most are not using dekstop computers anymore, and most of the time people are living off batteries and their traffic limited cellular data subscription, where this is probably a very costly operation for the user.

          •  Justin   ( @jlh@lemmy.jlh.name ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I get what you’re saying, but honestly 2gbps of traffic is also nothing in 2024.

            I think a ~$100k server can push something like 1-2tbps. That’d be enough bandwidth for 100k users.

            I’m not in the streaming industry, but that’s at least what I’ve seen from Netflix’s presentations. The main bottleneck for streaming servers these days isn’t even the network cards, it’s the bandwidth on your 16-24 channel DDR5 server RAM interfaces.

            Netflix presentation from 2021 about their 1tbps servers:

            https://people.freebsd.org/~gallatin/talks/euro2021.pdf

            • And what ISP will give you a connection with terabits in upload speed?
              Probably you’re thinking about placing the machine in a data center, I’m not familiar with that.

              However with that price I wouldn’t say that “it’s nothing”. Even just the hardware, where I live it’s the price of a house, and people barely afford it even with a loan.
              It’s probably not much to well running companies, but here we are speaking about individuals and relatively smaller groups, ran by donations and not for profit.

              And the main bottleneck there is, is it really the RAM? How? Are they not touching storage and keeping everything in a ramdisk?

              •  Justin   ( @jlh@lemmy.jlh.name ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                Yeah, video streaming can’t really be run on donations like Lemmy, that’s true.

                I think the presentation discusses it, but basically, if you have 20+ ssds in your server, trying to read them all and process the file system will mean you’re copying around too much data at once in your ram. A 1gb file might require like 5-10gb of data traffic in ram while the CPU is processing it due to copies and checks, etc. Ram can’t handle the resulting 10tbps of ram bandwidth needed. The optimization that Netflix is doing is to use pcie to send files directly over the pcie bus from the ssd to the network cards, skipping the cpu and ram altogether.

          •  Justin   ( @jlh@lemmy.jlh.name ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            That’s probably true, but economic sustainability is what makes privacy sustainability possible.

            Youtube is such a mess because it has to fight so hard to make ads work, which is unsustainable.

            Nebula makes its money through monthly fees and thus has no incentives to track users beyond providing a better service.

            Nebula being essentially a creators’ co-operative organization also helps with the sustainable governence side, too.

  • I have YouTube Premium but I have to use ReVanced to block shorts because it’s terrible for my ADHD. My mental health has improved ever since I ripped that fucker out of my life.

    I want to control what I see, and this isn’t even about them being paid anymore, it’s just about forcing me to see what I don’t want to see.

  •  Rentlar   ( @Rentlar@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 months ago

    Good luck YouTube

    The official YouTube app will provide one of the better experiences…

    Ha ha ha ha… the author must be dreaming or hasn’t tried many other apps. NewPipe lets you run videos at custom speed, and optionally pitch-shift videos. And you can save videos to watch on any app capable of playing video files stored on disk.

    • Agreed… The second half of this “article” reads like an ad/puff piece.

      A better researched article would go into the difference between API access, scrapers, and modifying the YouTube app, and question which of those YouTube will be able to detect. Maybe even discuss using region-pricing with a VPN to get YouTube premium for cheaper.

    •  Manmoth   ( @Manmoth@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      I agree. I refuse to watch ads or to pay for an experience that offers less than a fraction of what Newpipe offers. When Newpipe is no longer viable I’ll repurpose that time to chipping away at my reading list.

  • I quit when they took away the dislike counter, so many said they would but didn’t. All I ever see about Youtube is people complaining about their new shitty tactics… just leave, it’'s the ONLY way to get any changes. They will never change if people keep using the platform.

    Suck it up, leave, you won’t regret it.

  •  Ilandar   ( @Ilandar@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 months ago

    Interesting, I guess we will have to see how quickly and widely this is enforced. I haven’t used the official YouTube app for a very long time and have relied heavily on third party alternatives (Vanced/ReVanced, NewPipe, LibreTube, Grayjay). There is absolutely no way I am paying $17 a month for YouTube so I think a family plan would probably be the best option, though at this point I think I’d be more likely to just abandon the platform altogether.

  • I use the official YouTube app with premium. But, it glitches and reloads on its own after a while. Not to mention the UI frame rate getting capped to the video frame rate when playing a video.

    3rd party apps let me download and browse the videos in a better way and I can also download them in 4k resolution in HDR format.