- OpenStars ( @OpenStars@startrek.website ) English97•2 months ago
- LucidBoi ( @LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English47•2 months ago
this shit got me reachin for the luger
- DragonTypeWyvern ( @DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe ) English7•2 months ago
You realize Lugers were very famously the weapons of the Nazi officer class, and Einstein very famously had to flee Nazi Germany?
- LucidBoi ( @LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English1•2 months ago
oooo i did not know that, i was quoting some of plummcorp’s videos
This never gets old
- Infynis ( @Infynis@midwest.social ) English33•2 months ago
My fiancée and I were talking about this the other day, and the conclusion we reached was that our language, as it always has, is evolving, and these new phrases are just as valid as anything anyone has said before. People don’t want to accept it, because they think of Internet memes as silly, and that’s where a lot of this language comes from (there’s also racism involved, because, of course there is), but it’s too late. That’s what English is now. Sucks to suck, fam.
- pimento64 ( @pimento64@sopuli.xyz ) English10•2 months ago
What if language evolves to where the consensus opinion is to gatekeep silliness out of academia though? Evolution cuts both ways, English could theoretically evolve into a fully prescriptivized language like French, and that’s just as valid an evolution.
- Infynis ( @Infynis@midwest.social ) English5•2 months ago
That certainly could happen. It doesn’t seem very likely though, especially since so many different cultures already have their own versions of English, and the main two rarely agree on anything.
- luciferofastora ( @luciferofastora@lemmy.zip ) English3•2 months ago
I mean, it seems like that’s the cultural push-and-pull depicted here: Some people don’t like it and make that known. If their opinion ends up prevailing and papers containing silliness end up being rejected by the major journals of their field, doctoral comittees etc., eventually the silliness may be driven out and gatekept.
We fans of harmless humour would lament as much as the guy in the OP laments now. We would presumably attempt to encourage silliness, as the guy in the OP does now.
Consensus swinging one way naturally doesn’t magically mean we now have to change our opinions to fit the consensus. Right now, language evolves in our favour, and we will attempt to support and leverage that evolution because it suits us.
- blindsight ( @blindsight@beehaw.org ) English2•2 months ago
Based.
- Kusimulkku ( @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ) English2•2 months ago
I’m with the first person