Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Danterious ( Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Is it ever okay to generalize about people? why or why not?

message-square
message-square
20
link
fedilink
37
message-square

Is it ever okay to generalize about people? why or why not?

Danterious ( Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Dipbeneaththelasers ( Dipbeneaththelasers@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    Generally? Yes. Specifically? No.

  • davel [he/him] ( davel@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    This question can probably be interpreted a dozen different ways, so you’ll likely get answers to questions you hadn’t intended meow-popcorn

  • dan1101 ( dan1101@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes it’s ok to generalize. That is how humans quickly cope with an overwhelming amount of information. But you always need to be flexible and willing to recognize that not everyone fits the generalization.

    • AndrasKrigare ( AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is also important to stop and ask yourself what you’re generalizing and why.

      • dan1101 ( dan1101@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you see a guy walking down a neighborhood street dressed like a letter carrier you can probably assume he is a letter carrier.

        But maybe he is a stripper on his way to a party.

    • jsomae ( jsomae@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      and some will protest it.

  • atlasraven31 ( atlasraven31@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Generalization is a mental shortcut that simplifies things at the cost of accuracy. Ex: Dogs are canines. A Chihuahua is a canine. A wolf is a canine. But a Chihuahua is very different from a wolf.

  • cerement ( cerement@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    accountants and actuaries get to generalize

    • milkisklim ( milkisklim@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      And by that logic, statisticians/pollsters

      • Che Banana ( The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        and mathematicians

  • tobogganablaze ( tobogganablaze@lemmus.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s not just ok, it’s basically an requirment for civilisation to work at all.

  • intensely_human ( intensely_human@lemm.ee ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    No, it’s never okay to generalize. Unless you’re saying my previous sentence in which case it’s okay.

    • Random Dent ( CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I disagree. It’s fine to generalize about all people all the time. Every single one of them loves it.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni ( shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not if it causes anyone to treat people as anything besides the individuals they are.

  • mister_monster ( mister_monster@monero.town ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Who cares if it’s okay, that’s subjective. I have limited clock cycles, attention span, and I have to prioritize what I’m going to expend energy on. I don’t have time to get to know every person I encounter. I’ve got people and things in my life that matter to me, if I see you and you’ve got face tattoos I’m judging, cry about it. If I have a reason to get to know you maybe I’ll be pleasantly surprised. I doubt it. I’ve got a life to live, pattern recognition is a core part of my nature as a creature that I’m evolved to have, I’m gonna make use of that strength. Maybe if you don’t want to be judged as a scumbag don’t deliberately express mutable scumbag traits. Even if I’m wrong about someone I won’t regret it, it’s highly unlikely that if I were more open minded that their presence would’ve enriched my life and they would’ve become my best friend. It’s a cost benefit analysis. the likelihood that someone who deliberately expresses scumbag behavior wouldn’t behave like a scumbag is below 50%, and where I am wrong, they don’t need me to love them, they have people in their lives that know them and love them and why would they want to hang around a judgmental asshole anyway? Nobody really loses anything.

  • Fizz ( Fizz@lemmy.nz ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Its fine if you are talking to people capable of understanding that you are generalizing.

  • originalucifer ( originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    logistics? … generalized population requirements… ie. 50% are children, who need less of x.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s okay to generalise about people who generalise about people.

  • jet ( jet@hackertalks.com ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

  • AFC1886VCC ( AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • leaky_shower_thought ( leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    yes. but to so as not cause miscommunication problems, maybe keep it to close people who are in the know of what you mean.

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !asklemmy@lemmy.ml

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

  • !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • !fediverse@lemmy.ml
  • !selfhosted@lemmy.world

Looking for a community?

  • Lemmyverse: community search
  • sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
  • !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1.03K users / month
  • 4.11K users / 6 months
  • 1.49K local subscribers
  • 55.8K subscribers
  • 6.92K Posts
  • 153K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Evan ( Cloak@lemmy.ml ) 
  • mekhos ( mekhos@lemmy.ml ) 
  • tmpod ( tmpod@lemmy.pt ) 
  • OrangeSlice ( 14specks@lemmy.ml ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code