Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 Nemeski   ( @neme@lemm.ee )  to Firefox@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

Mozilla Welcomes Anonym: Privacy Preserving Digital Advertising

blog.mozilla.org

external-link
message-square
32
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.ml
  • news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
  • firefox@fedia.io
  • technology@lemmy.ml
118
external-link

Mozilla Welcomes Anonym: Privacy Preserving Digital Advertising

blog.mozilla.org

 Nemeski   ( @neme@lemm.ee )  to Firefox@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
32
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.ml
  • news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
  • firefox@fedia.io
  • technology@lemmy.ml
Mozilla Welcomes Anonym: Privacy Preserving Digital Advertising | The Mozilla Blog
blog.mozilla.org
external-link
Mozilla has acquired Anonym, a trailblazer in privacy-preserving digital advertising. This strategic acquisition enables Mozilla to help raise the bar for
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  •  kipparikalle161   ( @furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 years ago

    i don’t wanna see another ad on the web in my life, so i’ll just keep on using ublock.

    •  Piece_Maker   ( @Piece_Maker@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah pretty much. The privacy invasion of ad companies is terrible for sure, but the whole seeing ads all over the damn place in the first place is also annoying enough that even if they were somehow completely tracker-free I would still block them.

  •  jet   ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Removed by mod

  •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    deleted by creator

    •  GenderNeutralBro   ( @GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s so much worse than I thought, and I already hated it.

    •  lemmyvore   ( @lemmyvore@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is it done locally? On their servers? Who knows.

      You know it’s on their servers. 🙂 Otherwise they would be beating so much around the bush.

    •  Thevenin   ( @Thevenin@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s the only way to offer free services?! What about donation-based models? Maybe Mozilla could have set up something like what Brave has, except not based around a sketchy cryptocurrency.

      Please correct me if I’m mistaken, but I thought Brave only gave donatable tokens to users as a reward for watching ads… ads which Brave curated for the user based on their activity. It’s just targeted ad revenue with extra steps.

      At first blush, it seems to me that both Brave and Anonym want to be the middleman for targeted advertising. What am I missing?

      •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        deleted by creator

  •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Librewolf is the new Firefox

      Change my mind

      •  HouseWolf   ( @HouseWolf@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I switched a few months back after using Firefox /w ArkenWolf for years.

        It’s great having an out the box product I don’t have to immediately tweak settings or install 3rd party tweaks & plugins to have a decent experience with.

  •  observantTrapezium   ( @observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder if the process is open source or we just take their word that it’s privacy preserving. Anyway, privacy is not the only problem with online advertising, so I’m not going to give up adblocking any time soon.

    •  𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬   ( @Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s just an advertising company that knows to throw in some buzzwords.

  •  istanbullu   ( @istanbullu@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Advertising can’t be privacy preserving. What gives advertisement value is the fact that it’s targeted.

    •  Akasazh   ( @Akasazh@feddit.nl ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      Advertising signs next to a road are both targeted and privacy respecting, just like radio/tv.

      •  istanbullu   ( @istanbullu@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        They are worth nothing compared to targeted ads online that know your soul.

      •  jet   ( @jet@hackertalks.com ) Banned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Removed by mod

        •  Akasazh   ( @Akasazh@feddit.nl ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah I’m aware, I just reacted to the general statement about advertising that was untrue imho.

      •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s not what digital advertising is though.

        •  Akasazh   ( @Akasazh@feddit.nl ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          The person I reacted to didn’t talk about only digital advertising

    •  Cochise   ( @Cochise@lemmy.eco.br ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Contextual ads can be privacy preserving. As in Netflix ads in a entertainment page. The problem is targeting the ad on people, and not on content.

  •  𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬   ( @Dirk@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anonym was founded in 2022 by former Meta executives […]. The company was backed by [various venture capital corporations and multiple] strategic individual investors.

    •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      deleted by creator

      •  Nemo's public admirer   ( @Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Is there a way for one to use this on android FF?

        Edit:
        Found one. Bookmarking the following(got it from view-source:) worked:
        javascript:(function(){var d=document,s=d.createElement('script');s.crossOrigin='anonymous';s.src='https://unpkg.com/@mourner/bullshit@1.3.0/bullshit.js';d.body.appendChild(s);}())

        Websites that helped:
        https://paul.kinlan.me/use-bookmarklets-on-chrome-on-android/
        https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63614702/bookmarklet-functionality-missing-in-firefox-android#63620174
        Thanks for sharing the link

        •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          deleted by creator

  •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Great

    I love how Mozilla seems to be trying so hard to kill itself. You don’t see Google marketing Chrome as the browser that serves you ads and sends back telemetry.

    •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

  •  001Guy001   ( @001Guy001@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    for anybody that wants to disable it, go to the settings and search for “Allow websites to perform privacy-preserving ad measurement”

    (or through the dom.private-attribution.submission.enabled flag in about:config)

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

  •  kurumin   ( @kurumin@linux.community ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is why i am not giving another penny to Mozilla ever again

  •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      You forgot Librewolf and Waterfox

      •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          deleted by creator

        •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, no some guys blog stating his personal opinion is not evidence. We are just talking about things that are better than Firefox anyhow

          •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              They blog doesn’t give much of a reason of why it isn’t private. It feels more like “I don’t use this so you shouldn’t” mentality

              •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

                •  Possibly linux   ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  For one, Librewolf clearly states what it does on startup. It has to update ublock origin and other threat lists. That is better than having out of date protections is it not? Just because it connects doesn’t mean it sends much data. Things need to be hosted somewhere.

                  For Waterfox the argument is less bad but Waterfox is about on par with a lot of other stuff. It isn’t going to be crazy good and it is no where near as good as Librewolf but it is better than Firefox and many others. I would rate it as half bad.

                  Librewolf is the arguably best privacy browser. You haven’t named anything better. It breaks sites occasionally but it does protect privacy and security and scores well on fingerprinting resistance.

            •  LWD   ( @LWD@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              deleted by creator

    •  thingsiplay   ( @thingsiplay@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The biggest problem with the alternative browsers I wanted to use is, that they are not managed by my distribution (repository).

      •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        •  thingsiplay   ( @thingsiplay@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          EndevourOS, based on Archlinux. I was looking into forks of Firefox. For a webbrowser, it should be in the repository (not AUR) and it should be as quickly updated as Firefox itself. None of the forks I looked into match this criteria.

          •  ssm   ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            •  thingsiplay   ( @thingsiplay@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I wouldn’t call Arch bleeding edge. There are 2 stages before packages get updated in the repository for everyone (maybe besides trusted projects? which get immadiate update). I wait since almost 3 weeks until they update RetroArch. :D But that’s just terminology and not really important.

              I personally want the newest stuff and being updated all the time. Systemd isn’t a problem for me, it’s fine to me. The packages from Arch repository aren’t buggy for me, so no complains there. You can always find reasons why to switch to another distribution, but that often is not the entire truth. There is often so much more to consider. My previous point is about the software I was looking into not packaged by the distribution of my choice. So many people say packages should come upstream, like in Flatpak and distributions should not package anymore. I hardly disagree here. But I digress… again…

              I’m not here to switch my distribution, but think about switching to another Firefox base. I think Firefox is a great browser and want to keep using it, but have a few disagreements with Mozilla lately. That’s why I was looking into an alternative fork. I will stay on EndeavourOS slash Archlinux… at the moment at least.

              Edit: Dang it, I did it again. Why do I need to write entire blog posts as a forum reply?

Firefox@lemmy.ml

firefox@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !firefox@lemmy.ml

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the “Create Report” feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 12 users / week
  • 543 users / month
  • 2.13K users / 6 months
  • 468 local subscribers
  • 21.5K subscribers
  • 896 Posts
  • 7.88K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  k_o_t   ( @k_o_t@lemmy.ml ) 
  •  golden_zealot   ( @golden_zealot@lemmy.ml ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code