Interstellar_1 ( Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agothanks lain (rule)lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1482file-text
arrow-up1482imagethanks lain (rule)lemmy.blahaj.zoneInterstellar_1 ( Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square48linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareunalivejoy ( joyjoy@lemm.ee ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up68·2 years ago172.16.0.0/12 is a valid prefix for private networks. In fact, you get more hosts than 192.168.0.0/16, but less than 10.0.0.0/8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses
minus-square4am ( 4am@lemm.ee ) linkfedilinkarrow-up44·2 years agoYeah, it’s not that it’s not valid for private networks, it’s that 172.16.42.x is common for WiFi Pineapples
minus-squaremagi ( magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 years agoEvery “well ackqually” person in this thread is insufferable
minus-squareFarid ( abfarid@startrek.website ) linkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 years agoIDK, I find them quite sufferable and in fact I’m learning something from this thread.
minus-squaremagi ( magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoCan’t argue with that, I guess
172.16.0.0/12 is a valid prefix for private networks. In fact, you get more hosts than 192.168.0.0/16, but less than 10.0.0.0/8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_IP_addresses
Yeah, it’s not that it’s not valid for private networks, it’s that 172.16.42.x is common for WiFi Pineapples
Every “well ackqually” person in this thread is insufferable
IDK, I find them quite sufferable and in fact I’m learning something from this thread.
Can’t argue with that, I guess