Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to Technology · 2 years ago

Google violated antitrust laws to dominate online search, rules US judge | Google

www.theguardian.com

external-link
message-square
8
link
fedilink
96
external-link

Google violated antitrust laws to dominate online search, rules US judge | Google

www.theguardian.com

sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to Technology · 2 years ago
message-square
8
link
fedilink
Google violated antitrust laws to dominate online search, rules US judge
www.theguardian.com
external-link
Ruling states ‘Google is a monopolist’ in decision that could have major implications for how people use the internet
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • brisk ( brisk@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s amazing to watch the old, rusted machine of antitrust slowly grinding back to life, bit by bit.

  • millie ( millie@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Rip 'em apart! Make them into 6 different companies with single letter names and force two sets of two to share their letter to fuck with their marketing!

  • noodle (he/him) ( noodlejetski@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    …I’ll be in my bunk

  • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊 ( OneRedFox@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Government prosecutors had argued during the trial that Google illegally monopolized control over the internet search market, spending tens of billions of dollars each year on contracts to providers such as Apple and Samsung in order to become the default search engine on their devices. Justice department lawyers accused Google of using its dominant market position – they alleged the company controls about 90% of the US search market – to crowd out rivals and boost its own advertising revenues.

    Does this mean that their deal with Mozilla was ruled to be an antitrust violation?

    • sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve seen at least one journalist say that they think so.

      • 🦊 OneRedFox 🦊 ( OneRedFox@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Then that’s very concerning, because IIRC that is actually Mozilla’s largest funding source and losing that could easily threaten Firefox.

        • sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’ll be interesting, because Google have spent a lot of money to maintain dominance and no doubt Bing will try and fill the vacuum. Now is a good time for search engine investment. I suspect that Google will try and make some concessions to appease the law. Expect to hear rumours of Chromium and even Android becoming non profits.

  • onlinepersona ( onlinepersona@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    How high can they appeal? This is just a district court. I bet it’ll take another decade until a decision is reached.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 80 users / day
  • 373 users / week
  • 1.62K users / month
  • 4.83K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.8K subscribers
  • 6.47K Posts
  • 108K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • UI: 0.19.15
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code