Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com )  to Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago

Wasp-inspired setup 3D-prints complete homes for $1,000

newatlas.com

external-link
message-square
16
link
fedilink
22
external-link

Wasp-inspired setup 3D-prints complete homes for $1,000

newatlas.com

Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com )  to Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago
message-square
16
link
fedilink
The Crane WASP, also known as "the infinity 3D printer," uses locally sourced clay, mud or cement to 3D-print affordable homes. It can even use agricultural waste as aggregate. The system is now being used to build much-needed housing in Colombia.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Baggins ( baggins@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    180 grand for the printer? Holy cack that’s peanuts. Just think what we could do if we spent the money on this sort of thing instead of giving it to politicians.

    • Boomkop3 ( Boomkop3@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s cheaper than a sizable house, if this works it’s a really cool opportunity

      • Nighed ( Nighed@sffa.community ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The difficult bit is getting all of the utilities in there in a maintainable way I believe

        • Boomkop3 ( Boomkop3@reddthat.com ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Worst case you have a meter of traditional wall on the first floor. I like the concept!

        • Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hell, even if it was off-grid, it would be an improvement over being homeless.

    • Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I know, right? Seems like a really cool project, and for that cheap, small non-profits could get their own.

  • mindlesscrollyparrot ( mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    No reinforcement? What are the upper floors made of?

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ ( veganpizza69@lemmy.vg ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      These are gadget huts. It’s made of techno-hopium material.

      They’ll want money to do this in some poor rural area in a place where they can hardly name the native language. They think this will help poor people, but ignore the part where humans have always built shelters. If they fail to transfer the technology and know-how, then this technology is, over time, totally useless. And they will fail because such tech is usually patented and protected by IP laws.

      If they try to sell this in the richer parts of the World, all they will do is make the environment and climate worse by promoting more suburban sprawl.

      • mindlesscrollyparrot ( mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The ones in Texas are built of a “high performance polymer concrete”, so probably including cement and contributing to climate change. They appear to be single storey as well.

      • JillyB ( JillyB@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yep. The cheaper and easier solution to extreme housing issues is a few pallets of bricks and some mortar. This company is on a marketing campaign to try to get people in rich countries to get excited about buzzwords so they can get funding.

    • Mr_Blott ( Mr_Blott@feddit.uk ) Banned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • mindlesscrollyparrot ( mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, quite. They don’t appear to have windows or doors either (doorways, yes, but not doors), and they have holes in the roof. Yet the article mentions “homes” about a million times.

        It’s almost like somebody who didn’t have any knowledge of construction had the idea of 3D printing buildings. Probably in the shower.

        I notice that they fill the walls with natural fibers by hand (see the photo) - so they must pause the printers at regular intervals and get a ladder to get up to the top parts. So even what we see isn’t entirely 3D printed.

        • Mr_Blott ( Mr_Blott@feddit.uk ) Banned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Removed by mod

        • Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You’re being pedantic about the word “home” and whether they’re fully 3D printed, and I’m not sure why. A home is a place where people live, and whether they have windows or doors is not relevant to that point. The point of the design is that they don’t have to have those things, and they’re considering ongoing problems like climate change; the western ideal of a “home” is actually an impractical design when you start to consider the environment as it is.

          And yes, they have to infill the insulation. Nobody is claiming these homes are built without human intervention.

          Are you just trying to find weird ways to shit on a thoughtful way to help people?

          • mindlesscrollyparrot ( mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            The things they have chosen as demonstrators have holes in the roof! They are not suitable as homes by any reasonable definition. I also think that light and security are necessary for a home. Certainly if you are trying to improve on an existing “subpar dwelling”.

            If they wanted to demonstrate how they can 3D print homes in rural Colombia, why didn’t they print something that would be suitable to be a home in rural Colombia? They only had to load a different model into the printer, right?

            • Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Bruh, are you for real?

              • mindlesscrollyparrot ( mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Do you think that these might be some of the subpar dwellings that they’re talking about: https://southamericabackpacker.com/exploring-slums-of-medellin-colombia/ ?

                No, I’m not serious. Of course they don’t need roofs or windows or multiple storeys. I’m just joking about that stuff.

                • Telorand ( Telorand@reddthat.com ) OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  That’s what I thought. Bye.

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 67 users / day
  • 343 users / week
  • 1.29K users / month
  • 3.61K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 9.05K subscribers
  • 13.1K Posts
  • 21.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code