Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • self ( self@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 年前

    speaking of the Godot engine, here’s a layered sneer from the Cruelty Squad developer (via Mastodon):

    image description

    a post from Consumer Softproducts, the studio behind Cruelty Squad:

    weve read the room and have now successfully removed AI from cruelty squad. each enemy is now controlled in almost real time by an employee in a low labor cost country

  • David Gerard ( dgerard@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 年前

    i wouldn’t want to sound like I’m running down Hinton’s work on neural networks, it’s the foundational tool of much of what’s called “AI”, certainly of ML

    but uh, it’s comp sci which is applied mathematics

    how does this rate a physics Nobel??

    • db0 ( db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) Banned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 年前

      I think Zuckeberg has been saying the silent part out loud since day one.

      People just submitted it.

      I don’t know why.

      They “trust me”

      Dumb fucks

    • maol ( maol@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      Can’t really say I’m surprised that Mr Facebook takes this attitude. His whole fortune is built on the belief that aggregating and hosting content is more valuable than creating it

    • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 年前

      hmm, I meant to link that when I saw it, guess I forgot. whoops :D

      but yeah, entirely unsurprising from the guy who literally started by harvesting a pile of data and then building a commercial service off it. facebook and parentco should be ended, his assets taken for public good

  • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 年前

    the mozilla PR campaign to convince everyone that advertising is the lifeblood of commerce and that this is perfectly fine and good (and that everyone should just accept their viewpoint) continues

    We need to stare it straight in the eyes and try to fix it

    try, you say? and what’s your plan for when you fail, but you’ve lost all your values in service of the attempt?

    For this, we owe our community an apology for not engaging and communicating our vision effectively. Mozilla is only Mozilla if we share our thinking, engage people along the way, and incorporate that feedback into our efforts to help reform the ecosystem.

    are you fucking kidding me? “we can only be who we are if we maybe sorta listen to you while we keep doing what we wanted to do”? seriously?

    • self ( self@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      the purestrain corporate non-apology that is “we should have communicated our vision effectively” when your entire community is telling you in no uncertain terms to give up on that vision because it’s a terrible idea nobody wants

      • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 年前

        “it’s a failure in our messaging that we didn’t tell you about the thing you’d hate in advance. if we were any good we would’ve gotten out ahead of it (and made you think it’s something else)”

        and the thing is, that’s probably exactly the lesson they’re going to be learning from this :|

    • bitofhope ( bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      How do we ensure that privacy is not a privilege of the few but a fundamental right available to everyone? These are significant and enduring questions that have no single answer. But, for right now on the internet of today, a big part of the answer is online advertising.

      How do we ensure that traffic safety is not a privilege of the few but a fundamental right available to everyone? A big part of the answer is drunk driving.

  • Don’t know how much this fits the community, as you use a lot of terms I’m not inherently familiar with (is there a “welcome guide” of some sort somewhere I missed).

    Anyway, Wikipedia moderators are now realizing that LLMs are causing problems for them, but they are very careful to not smack the beehive:

    The purpose of this project is not to restrict or ban the use of AI in articles, but to verify that its output is acceptable and constructive, and to fix or remove it otherwise.

    I just… don’t have words for how bad this is going to go. How much work this will inevitably be. At least we’ll get a real world example of just how many guardrails are actually needed to make LLM text “work” for this sort of use case, where neutrality, truth, and cited sources are important (at least on paper).

    I hope some people watch this closely, I’m sure there’s going to be some gold in this mess.

    • The purpose of this project is not to restrict or ban the use of AI in articles, but to verify that its output is acceptable and constructive, and to fix or remove it otherwise.

      Wikipedia’s mod team definitely haven’t realised it yet, but this part is pretty much a de facto ban on using AI. AI is incapable of producing output that would be acceptable for a Wikipedia article - in basically every instance, its getting nuked.

    • bitofhope ( bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      Welcome to the club. They say a shared suffering is only half the suffering.

      This was discussed in last week’s Stubsack, but I don’t think we mind talking about talking the same thing twice. I, for one, do not look forward to browsing Wikipedia exclusively through pre-2024 archived versions, so I hope (with some pessimism) their disapponintingly milquetoast stance works out.

      Reading a bit of the old Reddit sneerclub can help understand some of the Awful vernacular, but otherwise it’s as much of a lurkmoar as any other online circlejerk. The old guard keep referencing cringe techbros and TESCREALs I’ve never heard of while I still can’t remember which Scott A we’re talking about in which thread.

    • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 年前

      Don’t know how much this fits the community, as you use a lot of terms I’m not inherently familiar with (is there a “welcome guide” of some sort somewhere I missed)

      first impression: your post is entirely on topic, welcome to the stubsack

      techtakes is a sister sub to sneerclub (also on this instance, previously on reddit) and that one has a bit of an explanation. generally any (classy) sneerful critique of bullshit and wankery goes, modulo making space for chuds/nazis/debatelords/etc (those get shown the exit)

    • swlabr ( swlabr@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      you use a lot of terms I’m not inherently familiar with (is there a “welcome guide” of some sort somewhere I missed).

      we’re pretty receptive to requests for explanations of terms here, just fyi! I imagine if it begins to overwhelm commenting, a guide will be created. Unfortunately there is something of an arms race between industry buzzword generation and good sense, and we are on the side of good sense.

  • PC Gamer put out a pro-AI piece recently - unsurprisingly, Twitter tore it apart pretty publicly:

    I could only find one positive response in the replies, and that one is getting torn to shreds as well:

    I did also find a quote-tweet calling the current AI bubble an “anti-art period of time”, which has been doing pretty damn well:


    Against my better judgment, I’m whipping out another sidenote:

    With the general flood of AI slop on the Internet (a slop-nami as I’ve taken to calling it), and the quasi-realistic style most of it takes, I expect we’re gonna see photorealistic art/visuals take a major decline in popularity/cultural cachet, with an attendant boom in abstract/surreal/stylised visuals

    On the popularity front, any artist producing something photorealistic will struggle to avoid blending in with the slop-nami, whilst more overtly stylised pieces stand out all the more starkly.

    On the “cultural cachet” front, I can see photorealistic visuals becoming seen as a form of “techno-kitsch” - a form of “anti-art” which suggests a lack of artistic vision/direction on its creators’ part, if not a total lack of artistic merit.

  • rook ( rook@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 年前

    Proton continuing to do pointlessly stupid and self-destructive things:

    https://infosec.exchange/@malwaretech/113257047424000919

    They’re basically admitting they didn’t pay an influencer to spread misinformation about public wifi in order to sell VPN products, they just stole her likeness, used her photo, and attributed completely made up quote to her.

    But it was a joke guys! We did a satire! I’m totally certain I know what satire is!

    • FredFig ( FredFig@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 年前

      The logical conclusion of normalizing “Social Media Manager” as a role in companies is that as they get better at their jobs and become more believable, the average corporate communication will trend towards 13-year old edgy shitposter. God I feel old.

    • Steve ( fasterandworse@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 年前

      I really think that Naomi Klein pointing out the brand being the product created a wave of tech entrepreneurs who reacted by making the user experience the product and now we’re seeing how bad they are at the most basic brand maintenance.

      • Steve ( fasterandworse@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 年前

        Plus they create brands that cultivate a following that is not compatible with corporate growth interests. Proton are like Mozilla, they wanna play with the bad kids but they promised their parents they’d come straight home

    • Mii ( mii@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      Earlier today, the Internet Archive suffered a DDoS attack, which has now been claimed by the BlackMeta hacktivist group, who says they will be conducting additional attacks.

      Hacktivist group? The fuck can you claim to be an activist for if your target is the Internet Archive?

    • hrrrngh ( hrrrngh@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      I feel like the Internet Archive is a prime target for techfashy groups. Both for the amount of culture you can destroy, and because backed up webpages often make people with an ego the size of the sun look stupid.

      Also, I can’t remember but didn’t Yudkowsky or someone else pretty plainly admit to taking a bunch of money during the FTX scandal? I swear he let slip that the funds were mostly dried up. I don’t think it was ever deleted, but that’s the sort of thing you might want to delete and could get really angry about being backed up in the Internet Archive. I think Siskind has edited a couple articles until all the fashy points were rounded off and that could fall in a similar boat. Maybe not him specifically, but there’s content like that that people would rather not be remembered and the Internet Archive falling apart would be good news to them.

      Also (again), it scares me a little that their servers are on public tours. Like it’d take one crazy person to do serious damage to it. I don’t know but I’m hoping their >100PB of storage is including backups, even if it’s not 3-2-1. I’m only mildly paranoid about it lol.

      • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 年前

        it scares me a little that their servers are on public tours

        frankly, the entire design of IA is more than a bit fucking stupid for the purpose it serves. “oh hey here’s the whole IA, right in this building over here” is just galaxybrained derpery

        physical goods I can understand central-point (or some centralisation) in archive management, but ffs we’re multiple decades into knowing how to build things differently

        (stance contextualisation: while I’m glad that the IA exists, I’m not an unreserved stan of it. there are a couple other notable concerns with it, alongside the thing I just mentioned)

    • bitofhope ( bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      I did not expect to be tricked into reading about the nighttime erections of the man with the most severe midlife crisis in the world.

      he has 80% fewer gray hairs, representing a “31-year age reversal”

      According to Wikipedia this guy is 47. Sorry about your hair as a teenager I guess? I hope the early graying didn’t lead to any long term self-esteem issues.

      • Alternatively, he only had 5 gray hairs to begin with I guess? I’m more concerned about the fact that he’s apparently taking time to set a timer whenever he gets hard at night. I don’t want to yuck anyone’s yum, but I’m pretty sure you’re doing it wrong if you’re taking time out of the experience to collect those metrics.

    • When I was adjusting to a high fiber diet for medical reasons I couldn’t figure out why I was so incredibly hungry despite eating enough.

      Then I realized “huh, I haven’t had any fat at all for the past week” and went and made myself four slices of buttery toast and they were so tasty.

    • FredFig ( FredFig@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 年前

      The Network School offers Johnson’s healthy food and a fitness program called the Blueprint Protocol. He claims that after three years of following his blueprint the duration of his night-time erections totals 179 minutes, “better than the average 18-year-old”

      Yeah, this is a very normal diet that’s advertising itself in very normal ways.

    • maol ( maol@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      I want a menu!

      What do you think is the venn diagram of “people who go to The Network School” and “men who believe in the meat-only diet”? I imagine there’s a lot of crossover

  • BlueMonday1984 ( BlueMonday1984@awful.systems ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    Online art school Schoolism publicly sneers at AI art, gets standing ovation

    Schoolism sneer

    And now, a quick sidenote:

    This is gut instinct, but I’m starting to get the feeling this AI bubble’s gonna destroy the concept of artificial intelligence as we know it.

    Mainly because of the slop-nami and the AI industry’s repeated failures to solve hallucinations - both of those, I feel, have built an image of AI as inherently incapable of humanlike intelligence/creativity (let alone Superintelligencetm), no matter how many server farms you build or oceans of water you boil.

    Additionally, I suspect that working on/with AI, or supporting it in any capacity, is becoming increasingly viewed as a major red flag - a “tech asshole signifier” to quote Baldur Bjarnason for the bajillionth time.

    For a specific example, the major controversy that swirled around “Scooby Doo, Where Are You? In… SPRINGTRAPPED!” over its use of AI voices would be my pick.

    Eagan Tilghman, the man behind the slaughter animation, may have been a random indie animator, who made Springtrapped on a shoestring budget and with zero intention of making even a cent off it, but all those mitigating circumstances didn’t save the poor bastard from getting raked over the coals anyway. If that isn’t a bad sign for the future of AI as a concept, I don’t know what is.

    • V0ldek ( V0ldek@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 年前

      I think a couple of people noted it at the start, but this is truly a paradigm shift.

      We’ve had so many science fiction stories, works, derivatives, musing about AI in so many ways, what if it were malevolent, what if it rebelled, what if it took all jobs… But I don’t think our collective consciousness was aware of the “what if it was just utterly stupid and incompetent” possibility.

      • I don’t think our collective consciousness was aware of the “what if it was just utterly stupid and incompetent” possibility.

        Its a possibility which doesn’t make for good sci-fi (unless you’re writing an outright dystopia (e.g. Paranoia)), so sci-fi writers were unlikely to touch it.

        The tech industry had enjoyed a lengthy period of unvarnished success and conformist press up to this point, so Joe Public probably wasn’t gonna entertain the idea that this shiny new tech could drop the ball until they saw something like the glue pizza sprawl.

        And the tech press isn’t gonna push back against AI, for obvious reasons.

        So, I’m not shocked this revelation completely blindsided the public.

        I think a couple of people noted it at the start, but this is truly a paradigm shift.

        Yeah, this is very much a paradigm shift - I don’t know how wide-ranging the consequences will be, but I expect we’re in for one hell of a ride.

        • Paranoia is the only one I can think of that’s actually pretty well on the money because the dystopian elements come from the fact that the wildly incompetent friend computer has been given total power despite everyone on some level knowing that fact, even if they can’t admit it (anymore) without being terminated. The secret societies all think they can work the situation to their advantage and it provides a convenient scapegoat for terrible things they probably want to do anyways.

  • gerikson ( gerikson@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 年前

    Any mild pushback to the claims of LLM companies sure bring out the promptfondlers on lobste.rs

    Plenty of agreement, but also a lot of “what is reasoning, really” and “humans are dumb too, so it’s not so surprisingly GenAIs are too!”. This is sure a solid foundation for multi-billion startups, yes sirree.

    • self ( self@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 年前

      it’s kind of comforting that the current attitude towards generative AI in some tech spaces is “of course it can’t do cognition and it isn’t really good for anything, who said it was” which is of course rich from the exact same posters who were breathlessly advertising for the tech as revolutionary both online and at work as recently as a couple of weeks ago (and a lot of them still hedge it with “but it might be useful in the near future”). the comfort is it feels like that attitude comes from deep embarrassment, like how the orange site started claiming it is and always was skeptical of crypto once the technology got irrevocably associated with scams and gambling and a lot of the easy money left

      • gerikson ( gerikson@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 年前

        yeah, there’s a stench of desperation from the defenders

        of course, as with crypto, there are uses (in the case of crypto , nothing legitimate). And it will be going to be a fallback for fondlers to point them out (for example, I believe that auto-generated audiobooks are viable, if they’re generated from actual books)

      • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 年前

        I was watching a h0ffman stream the other day when someone happened to bring up autoplag in some context. didn’t see the asking context, but h0ffman’s answer warmed my heart. paraphrased: “what would you want to use that for? you wouldn’t steal a mod, why would you want to use a prompt? that stole from artists. fuck that shit.”

        (h0ffman’s one of the names in the demoscene, often plays sets at compos, does some of his own demos, etc)