Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sue_me_please ( sue_me_please@awful.systems )  to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years ago

US startup charging couples to ‘screen embryos for IQ’

www.theguardian.com

external-link
message-square
27
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.ml
59
external-link

US startup charging couples to ‘screen embryos for IQ’

www.theguardian.com

sue_me_please ( sue_me_please@awful.systems )  to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
27
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.ml
Heliospect’s services were marketed at up to $50,000 for 100 embryos, undercover footage shows
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Boomkop3 ( Boomkop3@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    oh great, commercial eugenics

    • SplashJackson ( SplashJackson@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      We knew it was bound to happen sometime with capitalism

  • ShakingMyHead ( ShakingMyHead@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Given these three steps, what’s the logical fourth one?”
    “…”
    “God this embryo is an idiot.”

    • swlabr ( swlabr@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Doesn’t even know the basic strats for these pattern questions, SMH, Do You Even IQ Test? (trying to start DYEIQT)

  • V0ldek ( V0ldek@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    The thing with IVF is that it’s already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

    Like, read some of the parameters they’d screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I’m sorry? You’re looking for a better-educated sperm?

    And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. “I want my cum to be a pilot!” The fuck.

    • bitofhope ( bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lamarckian eugenics!

    • Jonathan Hendry ( jonhendry@iosdev.space ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      @V0ldek @sue_me_please

      IVF isn’t required if fertility concerns or frozen eggs aren’t involved, they can give you the home game.

      And it should be no surprise that sperm banks want to be able to compete on the “quality” of their donors.

      Just watch out for the bank that is 75% doctor jizz but it’s all from the proprietor.

      • gerikson ( gerikson@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        A fertility doctor here in Sweden took sperm from men who were undergoing investigations for infertiliy and used it as donor sperm.

        Imagine their surprise when decades later they found out they had kids.

        Not sure why he chose those particular samples, maybe all he had available.

  • luciole (they/them) ( luciole@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    I didn’t understand how the hell the “pro-life” crowd would cheer for IVF since it entails destroying plenty of embryos. Now I understand: it’s the opportunity for some good old fashioned eugenics.

    • gerikson ( gerikson@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re not cheering. Evangelical anti-abortion activists have long targeted IVF and it’s been practically banned in at least one US state.

      • luciole (they/them) ( luciole@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Some days ago Trump came out saying he loves IVF and he’s the “father of IVF” so I assumed the evangelicals are at least OK with it, considering how the Republican are extremely close with them.

        • rook ( rook@awful.systems ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          He will say what he thinks needs to be said, and the forced-birthers understand this. They haven’t defeated abortion yet and aren’t going to split their efforts, but they will continue to put pressure on ivf in the meantime. Remember, they weren’t always anti-abortion, and didn’t switch to it overnight! Their current position that life begins at conception necessarily conflicts with current ivf practises, and they’ll say they don’t disapprove of ivf in principle, and they might even have a friend who’s getting ivf, but talk is cheap and they’ll absolutely oppose any legislation that tries to guarantee access to it. Which is precisely what is happening.

          • maol ( maol@awful.systems ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            All of these measures to “protect life” have the convenient side effect of forcing women back into the kitchen. IVF allows women to have children & careers, or choose to be solo parents. It allows lesbian couples to have kids.

        • gerikson ( gerikson@awful.systems ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Trump has absolutely no principles or beliefs other than those that profit him.

    • swlabr ( swlabr@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Reminds me of how marriage advice has its roots in white supremacy. (CW: a lot. self harm, SA, abuse)

    • anachronist ( anachronist@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The Catholic Church hates IVF so I don’t think it’s necessarily the pro-life crowd that is promoting this.

  • antifuchs ( antifuchs@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would definitely hate to be burdened with an IQ. Such a terrible thing to be born with

    • Maeve ( Maeve@kbin.earth ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Only if burdened with emotional intermittence, as well.

  • bitofhope ( bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If I only have about fifty embryos, can I pay $50k to have them scanned now and have another 50 embryo scans left on my account or do I have to have all of them on hand immediately?

  • HelixDab2 ( HelixDab2@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    IQ is so incredibly complicated, and we really don’t know how it works, and what genes allow for the possibility of high IQ. So what are they even screening for? If they’re just looking at broad trends in population IQ compared to genetics, then what they’re actually seeing are environmental factors, which play an immense role in whether or not potential is ever reached.

    • Roamin' Chemicals ( roaminchemicals@mastodon.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      @HelixDab2 @sue_me_please I’d go a step further and say it doesn’t work. It’s an inherently flawed concept that you can reduce human thought, skill, ability, and behaviour to a number and then rank people by it. The legacy of general intelligence itself is that of people assuming it exists and seeking to justify their assumptions.

  • David Gerard ( dgerard@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    training your sperm to pass raven’s progressive matrices

    • bitofhope ( bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      At least corvids are smart. Better that than some birdbrain’s progressive matrices.

  • maol ( maol@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I actually read a Red Dwarf fanfic about this once where Rimmer’s parents had paid for embryo selection to make sure all their kids had high IQs and good genes because they wanted to make sure they all got into the Space Corps

  • NigelFrobisher ( NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you’re stupid enough to fall for this they euthanise the foetus.

    • froztbyte ( froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      let’s not

    • flere-imsaho ( mawhrin@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      ironic eugenics is genocidal the same way

TechTakes@awful.systems

techtakes@awful.systems

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !techtakes@awful.systems

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 75 users / day
  • 385 users / week
  • 954 users / month
  • 1.84K users / 6 months
  • 55 local subscribers
  • 2.75K subscribers
  • 1.54K Posts
  • 36.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • David Gerard ( dgerard@awful.systems ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code