FundMECFS ( FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years ago...lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square61linkfedilinkarrow-up1391
arrow-up1391image...lemmy.blahaj.zoneFundMECFS ( FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square61linkfedilink
minus-squareAntiproton ( Antiproton@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 years agoScience doesn’t change just because some groups try to use it to forward an agenda.
minus-squaremelitele ( SparrowHawk@feddit.it ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 years agoBut it does. Cigarettes were healthy and climate change didn’t exist 50 years ago
minus-squareAntiproton ( Antiproton@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoThere was never any science saying “cigarettes are healthy”.
minus-squareHonytawk ( Honytawk@lemmy.zip ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoClimate Change has existed for over 110 years in science.
minus-squareDraconic NEO ( Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoI mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.
minus-squareFundMECFS ( FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) OPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 years agoThe truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.
minus-squareDraconic NEO ( Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoExactly.
minus-squaremelitele ( SparrowHawk@feddit.it ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 years agoYes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible. There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge. Science has always changed, just like human culture did
minus-squareBoomkop3 ( Boomkop3@reddthat.com ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoWhat it is vs how it’s (ab)used
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme ( interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoOr “real science” versus “imaginary science” Bonus round : “real science has never been tried”
minus-squareBoomkop3 ( Boomkop3@reddthat.com ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoOne more to fill the bingo card
minus-squareJackbyDev ( JackbyDev@programming.dev ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoNo True Scotsman argument sort of. Now, I’m not saying we ignore science or throw it out, but there are flaws.
minus-squareChuymatt ( Chuymatt@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoIs it made by humans? Yah, there are flaws.
minus-squareglitchcake ( glitchcake@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
Science doesn’t change just because some groups try to use it to forward an agenda.
But it does. Cigarettes were healthy and climate change didn’t exist 50 years ago
There was never any science saying “cigarettes are healthy”.
Climate Change has existed for over 110 years in science.
I mean those things didn’t change, it was just about how research was manipulated by money and human biases.
The truth doesn’t change. Scientific consensus does. Scientific consensus has been wrong on countless things. After all, science is about getting things a little less wrong every time.
Exactly.
Yes but science is a process, not a thing, and that process is corruptible.
There is a differentiation between the natural world for how it’s made and the human process that quantifies that knowledge.
Science has always changed, just like human culture did
What it is vs how it’s (ab)used
Or “real science” versus “imaginary science”
Bonus round : “real science has never been tried”
One more to fill the bingo card
No True Scotsman argument sort of.
Now, I’m not saying we ignore science or throw it out, but there are flaws.
Is it made by humans? Yah, there are flaws.
deleted by creator