Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 Lordin1   ( @Lordin1@beehaw.org )  to Technology · 1 year ago

MacBook Pro's Future: 2025's M5 Update Might Be Disappointing

vocal.media

external-link
message-square
11
link
fedilink
12
external-link

MacBook Pro's Future: 2025's M5 Update Might Be Disappointing

vocal.media

 Lordin1   ( @Lordin1@beehaw.org )  to Technology · 1 year ago
message-square
11
link
fedilink
Attention Required! | Cloudflare
vocal.media
external-link
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  •  Deceptichum   ( @Deceptichum@quokk.au ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like it will be the same as the last, small incremental upgrades. That’s perfectly fine, every release of mostly anything doesn’t need to be massive overhauls.

    •  IllNess   ( @IllNess@infosec.pub ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. A massive overhaul just introduces more problems. I wish they did the same with the OS updates.

  •  Em Adespoton   ( @adespoton@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is fine to me… 2026 is the year I start looking to replace my M1. I usually go 5-7 years between refreshes.

    •  2001aCentenaryofFederation   ( @2001aCentenaryofFederation@fedia.io ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah this news is only disappointing for people who buy new computers every year (is that even a thing?). Whatever upgrades it has will also feature the last 4+ years of updates, so to someone coming from an M4 yeah yikes. But for my m1 max? it will be noticeable.

      •  realitista   ( @realitista@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only upgrade that matters for most non-gaming or video production use cases any more is RAM anyway.

        •  Em Adespoton   ( @adespoton@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True… I still regularly use my 2008 17” MBP and it’s always the RAM that’s the limiting factor.

          •  realitista   ( @realitista@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            My 2018 Mac mini (the last model with upgradable ram) has 64gb and it’s way faster than any m4 without 64gb. I will keep it until it’s completely untenable to do so. Minimum 10 years, I’m hoping I can manage 15-20. Maybe by then I’ll actually be able to afford a new Mac with 64gb or more.

            •  Elkenders   ( @Elkenders@feddit.uk ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I can’t tell how serious this is.

              •  realitista   ( @realitista@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m dead serious. CPU and GPU ceased being bottlenecks for most non gaming or video editing workflows a long time ago. The only one left is RAM, and Apple exploits that. By now all Macs should have 64gb as minimum config based on the actual part costs.

                •  Elkenders   ( @Elkenders@feddit.uk ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Id love to see you show it being loads faster than an M4. Aside from the huge CPU and GPU improvements the ram is 2-3x faster. And the storage is loads faster Maybe you’re running virtual machines or something reliant on much more memory. Even then I’d bet you’d get significant (2-4x) improvements with the M4.

                  Maybe you’re being hyperbolic and it’s going over my head!

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 117 users / day
  • 1.58K users / week
  • 3.06K users / month
  • 6.56K users / 6 months
  • 5.07K local subscribers
  • 40.9K subscribers
  • 5.45K Posts
  • 97.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Chris Remington   ( @remington@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  •  gyrfalcon   ( @gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  •  rs5th   ( @rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  •  coldredlight   ( @coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Leigh   ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code