Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to Technology · 2 years ago

Pornhub Is Now Blocked In Almost All of the U.S. South

www.404media.co

external-link
message-square
61
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
193
external-link

Pornhub Is Now Blocked In Almost All of the U.S. South

www.404media.co

sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to Technology · 2 years ago
message-square
61
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • ghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
As of today, three more states join the list of 17 that can't access Pornhub because of age verification laws.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Strayce ( Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    2 years ago

    In other news, VPN subscriptions have skyrocketed in the U.S South.

    • tal ( tal@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly, it might be a good thing long-run to have a higher percentage of users on VPNs. They aren’t a magic cure-all, but they do help make it safer to use untrusted networks and discourage some things on the service side, like geolocating and data-mining users based on IP.

      “This might address some security problems” is somewhat abstract to appeal to most users, I think. “VPN or no tits” is something that I think is more generally-relatable.

      • Scrubbles ( scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m worried it will lead to bans of those though too.

        • Strayce ( Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not that they won’t try, but it’s very difficult to blanket ban VPNs. There are very legitimate business reasons to use them and it isn’t necessarily easy for ISPs to distinguish between a “recreational” VPN connection and an employee VPN’ing into say, a work datacenter. Industry will kick up a massive fuss about it.

          • bobs_monkey ( bobs_monkey@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            2 years ago

            Hell, I VPN into my home network all the time to access my self hosted work applications, it’s 10x more secure than leaving ports open to the wider internet.

          • realitista ( realitista@lemm.ee ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Would be hilarious if they tried. I wouldn’t put it past them.

      • corsicanguppy ( corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was raised Rural. I can confirm.

        • tal ( tal@lemmy.today ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think that it’s kind of globally-applicable.

          And I’ve wondered in the past whether the long-run for the Internet was always going to be people generally winding up with VPNs for similar reasons. I’m far from the first:

          The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

          – John Gilmore

    • Owl ( BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or tor

      • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol ( IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

  • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol ( IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • sin_free_for_00_days ( sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 years ago

    The exact phrasing varies, but in most states, the details of the law are the same: Any “commercial entity” that publishes “material harmful to minors” online can be held liable—meaning, tens of thousands of dollars in fines and/or private lawsuits—if it doesn’t “perform reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of individuals attempting to access the material.”

    Sure seems like that would cover a lot of websites, including most news sites.

  • ianhclark510 ( ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yay, another paywall link

    • millie ( millie@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 years ago

      404 Media: we’re not like the rest. Except when we are.

      • shackled ( shakcked@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wouldn’t quite call it a paywall. This article is free with an email sign up. They discussed this before and not sure I believe it but their reason/excuse for free email sign up was to combat AI scrapers. They noticed their articles were getting scraped by a few well known AI scrape and repost “news” sites.

        • Pechente ( Pechente@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          How long until somebody automates the scraping with throw-away email addresses?

          • DdCno1 ( DdCno1@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 years ago

            Wrong question. How long ago, you mean.

        • redfellow ( red@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s a bs reason, email paywall bypassing is so easy that it could just as well not exist.

  • some_guy ( some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hence, no one watches porn anymore. /s

  • DavidGarcia ( DavidGarcia@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    good, god fearing christians should only watch mormon porn

  • Trantarius ( Trantarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    If they actually wanted to protect children, the answer is simple: reverse the responsibilities. Require porn sites to include metadata indicating it isn’t safe for minors. Require browsers to recognize that metadata, and filter out that content if parental controls are enabled. If parents are still too lazy to turn it on, make it default (like “safe search”, but more effective). The fact none of them have even suggested this is proof they don’t care about children or even porn, they just want to be seen as if they do.

    • limerod ( limerod@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Parental control software like Adguard or Adguard DNS family protection, filter out NSFW content like this website. A website doesn’t even need to do a thing for it to work.

    • Chakravanti ( Chakravanti@monero.town ) BannedBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      They don’t care about anything other than watching you. They don’t care how old you are. That’s just an excuse.

      • JokeDeity ( JokeDeity@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah I hate when the real topic gets buried in nonsense white noise. This is PURELY about collecting those IDs and data.

  • HeartyOfGlass ( HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is devastating for my “southerners watching pornhub” kink.

    • tal ( tal@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or does it make it more taboo and thus more appealing?

      • AFallingAnvil ( AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        *turns to look at Alabama expectantly*

  • Odys ( Odys@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Conservatism has been forcefully on the rise, but something like porn can cause it’s downfall. It reminds me of the videotape format wars end 70s, early 80s, with VHS pushing out Betamax due to porn.

    • corsicanguppy ( corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This changed for blu-ray/HDDVD. It was payola that enabled Blu-ray to win.

  • ApeNo1 ( ApeNo1@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    South of the border you can no longer watch films that go “South of the Border”.

  • GrindingGears ( GrindingGears@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    Praise be. By his hand. May the Lord open.

    Gilead voted for this…

    • corsicanguppy ( corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Temba, at rest.

  • Linktank ( Linktank@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good thing there’s more than one porn website then I guess. Don’t tell them.

    • scbasteve7 ( scbasteve7@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its all porn, pornhub just prohibits itself from operating in states that pass this legislation.

      The legislation in question requires you to prove you’re over 18 to enter these sites. Whether that’s through id or credit card info. However, this can lead to some pretty insane security issues. Just imagine if the id of every user along with their browsing data got leaked.

      So instead, pornhub just refuses to operate in those states.

    • Gerudo ( Gerudo@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      A surprising number of adult sites have been blocked. Most who abide by the block are the big branded companies. There are plenty who just ignore it, but those are mostly smaller aggregate sites that if one goes down, there are a dozen others just like it.

      • jdeath ( jdeath@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        there’s so many! but which ones!?!

    • Alice ( Alice@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not showing my driver’s license to any porn website, that’s stupid.

      • Linktank ( Linktank@lemmy.today ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        What a weird world to live in. Who would ever do that?

        • Alice ( Alice@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          No one, and that’s probably the point. They can’t ban porn, but they can make it so terrible for both companies and viewers that the porn companies give up.

  • Stalinwolf ( Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    They all have cousins, so…

  • schnurrito ( schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    John Perry Barlow was right: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence

    • Dragon Rider (drag) ( dragonfucker@lemmy.nz ) 
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Did he have a solution to the problem of online anarcho-capitalism?

      • interdimensionalmeme ( interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Legalize recreational nukes, worldwide.

  • kbal ( kbal@fedia.io ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Interesting to learn that Pornhub now requires “identity verification for uploaders.” That must’ve had the same effect on a lot of non-professional uploaders that the new laws will have on U.S. viewers, making them go elsewhere.

    • ryper ( ryper@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      They purged everything for unverified uploaders in 2020:

      “As part of our policy to ban unverified uploaders, we have now also suspended all previously uploaded content that was not created by content partners or members of the Model Program,” Pornhub said in a company blog post, as first reported by Vice. The purge appears to have hit almost 9 million of the 13.5 million videos on Pornhub as of Sunday, or nearly two-thirds of all the content hosted on the site.

      “This means every piece of Pornhub content is from verified uploaders, a requirement that platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat and Twitter have yet to institute,” the company added. “In today’s world, all social media platforms share the responsibility to combat illegal material. Solutions must be driven by real facts and real experts. We hope we have demonstrated our dedication to leading by example.”

      The swipe at other social media platforms is no accident. “It is clear that Pornhub is being targeted not because of our policies and how we compare to our peers, but because we are an adult content platform,” the company added. Citing Facebook’s transparency report, the company added, “Over the last three years, Facebook self-reported 84 million instances of child sexual abuse material. During that same period, the independent, third-party Internet Watch Foundation reported 118 incidents on Pornhub. That is still 118 too many, which is why we are committed to taking every necessary action.”

      • Midnitte ( Midnitte@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        Citing Facebook’s transparency report, the company added, “Over the last three years, Facebook self-reported 84 million instances of child sexual abuse material. During that same period, the independent, third-party Internet Watch Foundation reported 118 incidents on Pornhub. That is still 118 too many, which is why we are committed to taking every necessary action.”

        Some Balatro level shade being thrown there.

    • interdimensionalmeme ( interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pornhub became shit overnight, I haven’t bothered since.

      • IronKrill ( IronKrill@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s still good stuff, but less of it and fewer amateurs sadly. The “amateurs” that are there are all promoting their OnlyFans. The year or so after the sweep was pretty clear how much they lost.

        • interdimensionalmeme ( interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean, no couple who decided to prop up their phone on the night stand and bang in front of millions is going to fill out registration documents and identify themselves. My stuff is gone too, I didn’t do it for money and I don’t jump through up or fulfill demands to share what I graciously offered for free, so fuck them.

          I really never looked back and I’m pretty sure it’s exactly how I imagine it is. Garbage porn made with commercial intent in studios with directors, camera crew and shit, artless and empty, if not teasingly exploitative with cuts meant to frustrate you until you get your credit card out

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 163 users / day
  • 1.25K users / week
  • 2.2K users / month
  • 5.28K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.6K subscribers
  • 6.39K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code