I was going through my Wal-Mart+ subscription plan that I got for free and I saw their offers. One of which was EMeals, that was a 60-day trial. I thought that this was like Blue Apron or other meal delivery services so I thought I’d take a crack at it and hope that it would get me on a path to eat better.

Turns out, it’s just a meal planner. And it’s absurd to me why and how would anyone pay for something when there are countless and countless recipes and meal planners readily available for free. Who’d the fuck would want to pay for a planner? That’s like paying for a calendar app.

  • Cruxifux ( Cruxifux@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 years ago

    I do not get people who still pay for cable tv. My dad pays like 120 dollars a month for it and the programming is horrible, the ads are insane, all the best sports shit is on streaming services now, I do not understand it at all.

    • themurphy ( themurphy@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I know this sub, and basically most of Lemmy, are pro Linux. But honestly? It’s not as good as Windows and macos for everyday folk. We are kidding ourselves.

      It CAN do anything they can, but it’s way too hard, and you might have to code your own drivers for some of it.

      You pay for it to just work, and that’s why I 100% get why you pay for an OS.

      Note: I don’t think anyone feel like they even pay for their OS, if it’s not enterprise. It’s preinstalled, nobody thinks further than that.

      • howrar ( howrar@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is the main reason I still keep Windows around. The majority of my stuff “just works” much better on Linux, but every once in a while, you need to interact with someone else via some weird proprietary software and it’s not really reasonable to go “sorry, can’t do it because Linux”, nor is it reasonable to spend several hours figuring out for Linux when I’m likely only using it once.

        Windows is completely free though. I don’t even bother to remove the watermark.

      • neon_nova ( neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Over 3 different computers, I have never not had some bug on windows after a clean install.

        Stuff like, text inputs not working on sticky notes, screenshots not working, now I’m having driver issues where some windows flicker black rapidly. I need to do another fresh install to fix it.

        I can’t even think of a single bug I’ve had using Linux. If it were not for a single piece of software not working on Linux by any means, I’d be using that.

        The only games I’ve not had work on Linux straight away are games with anti-cheat, so I understand windows gamers using windows to play them, but otherwise Linux gaming has been basically flawless.

      • Depends. My mother’s computer didn’t have the hardware necessary to drive Win11, so I explained the options, and she said she’d try Linux.

        She’s on Fedora Workstation on both her Desktop and Laptop now, both relatively standard HP Computers (the Desktop being very, very old, however).

        She can connect to her work server via Citrix and access the software she needs. She can take work calls via MicroSIP. She can edit documents locally with onlyoffice. She can do whatever else she needs in the browser. None of this needed any non-standard drivers or packages, except for MicroSIP, for which Wine needed to be installed, though it worked without any special configuration.

        So it can work perfectly well. Depending on the use case.

      • Yup. I work with both and I greatly prefer working with linux now but I get paid to stare at it, dig into config files, understand file systems, etc. The average consumer does not want to do this and doesn’t give a shit about internals, they just want to click install and work which windows is pretty good at. If you told them they needed to edit a config file and play with services your customer support lines would be jammed.

    • chaosCruiser ( chaosCruiser@futurology.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Small bits of code can be made and maintained as a hobby or a passion project, but larger things begin to require money. Although a lot of FOSS is maintained by volunteers, money still has its role in the equation.

    • communism ( communism@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Free porn tends to be full of abuse towards its actors. Not that paid porn is automatically ethical but there are definitely indie options where no one is being coerced into performing sexual acts they’re not comfortable with. Also if you have a niche fetish sometimes the only options are paywalled.

    • dev_null ( dev_null@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      How is it surprising people pay for operating systems? The vast majority of computers sold are bundled with an operating system license, and most people just use what came with the computer.

    • Boomkop3 ( Boomkop3@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      So many people I know complain about windows having ads, that it’s auto installing bloatware, has annoying checks, forces you to login…

      I paid the full price about a decade ago and haven’t been bothered by any of that. And yes, I’ve upgraded to windows 11

  • teawrecks ( teawrecks@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    As an American, Turbo Tax. I’ve been using FreeTaxUSA for almost 20 years with no problems, without paying for filing software.

    But if I weren’t American, my answer would probably be: tax software.

    • Soulifix ( Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s funny that the IRS has now been offering their own tax-free service. Intuit thought they could strong-arm people but even the IRS thought “no bruh, you’re crazy”.

      I just never saw the appeal of paying for tax software/services, well maybe I can see it in services because there’s still a lot of people that have trouble with filing taxes and they may be in unique tax situations that they don’t understand.

      But Tax Software makes it stupid easy to understand so it should not be something we pay for.

    • Honytawk ( Honytawk@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Most countries don’t have tax software.

      They have a website usually. A free one, from the government. That calculates their taxes for them. You just have to check if it is correct from your side.

  • The meal subscription services strike me as premade salads on steroids. You’re paying a premium for all the labor, ingredients, (excessive) packaging, shipping, their profit, etc and you still have to put it together and cook it. It really isn’t that hard to look up a couple of recipes, buy the ingredients (you’d probably be going to the store anyway) and prep for 30 or so minutes a night. If you make full recipes you’ll probably have leftovers so you won’t even have to cook the next day.

    • I agree for the big ones, but we have a local one I’ve subscribed to a few times, for a couple months at a time.

      They pull all the ingredients from local farms, do local delivery or pickup at farmer’s markets, and they’re minimal on packaging, and they reuse the bags and ice packs. I haven’t done it in a while but it was pretty nice and it was helpful to break out of the routine of the same meals week in and out.

  • Brutticus ( Brutticus@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Streaming services. I’ve been balls deep into piracy since I was a kid but I remember once I was house sitting and my friend had netflix and I Was drunk and wanted to watch He-man. I turned on their netflix and it didn’t have it. I was like, why even pay for this shit whats it good for? I have been morally opposed to paying for streaming ever since. Ive been taking some classes recently and some of the Gen Z kids are like, baffled I don’t have spotify. I am baffled they can’t pirate songs. My friends, you dont have to pay for that single. I can download it during the span of this conversation with my phone.

    Also on that note, any of WotC’s D&D tools. I remember the D&Dinsider debacle. 4e was a cool game but basically unplayable without some automation. They tried downloadable software but found people had way too easy a time hacking it. So they launched a constantly crashing version behind a paywall that ran on silverlight (so it couldn’t run on Mac. As a webapp.) And hackers still kept up the downloadable character builder with updates. It was more consistent, didn’t crash, and is still functional to this day. I ban D&Dbeyond from my games. I encourage everyone to use 5e.tools (if they must play 5e).

    • I default to piracy too, but I’m guessing you don’t listen to a lot of new music. The thing a music service offers isn’t just access, it’s discoverability. It didn’t replace my FLAC collection, it expanded it. What it replaced was listening to the radio to find new stuff.

      For video I’m more with you. I’m happy to rely on word of mouth. Especially since the streaming services drop movies all the time and discriminate against watching in a browser. Getting a good rip means you can watch it anywhere, anytime, and not have to worry about it disappearing.

  • Streaming. OS’s, disposable shavers/ head, prime. Very few subscriptions are a good deal and if they are a good deal thats just them cornering the market to eventually close in.

  • comfy ( comfy@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    (Conditionally) journals, studies and some books. And, for that matter, most television, film and music.

    Particularly when paying is not supporting the creator, only the publisher.