I mean can’t someone steal code from the devices file manager? or create his own fork?(Sorry for bad English)
Everything is open source if you can read assembly.
Sadly not, it is often considered illegal to reverse-engineer software for the purpose of circumventing DRM.
It’s only illegal if you don’t abolish the state
Closed source is generally compiled code in an executable, so you’d have to do a lot of work de-compiling it back to the source code first.
Even at the OS level, lots of the stuff “under the hood” in Windows is obfuscated, and still the same issue, most of it is compiled code, you’d have to de-compile a significant portion of it (in an OS there’s also an amount that doesn’t have to be de-compiled) to be able to actually look at the code itself.
Please don’t apologize for bad English, it’s not against the law to have English as a second language. As a US citizen, one of the most frustrating thing is knowing brilliantly competent and capable immigrants who are ignored and passed over because their education and credentials are simply in a different language. They often come as refugees and didn’t have the opportunity to get a great English education, but literally come with multiple degrees from quality universities in their home countries. Treating them like they know less because they speak a different language is so fucking absurd. Also, your English is fine, don’t beat yourself up.
I would sound worse in any language I tried to speak other than English, you’re doing better than I would, and better than a lot of English speakers would when put in the same situation speaking a second language they’re not familiar with.
Thanks man I just sometimes make grammar mistakes and people ridicule my weird choice of words and my accent thats why I said sorry for bad English
Hey, I used to be a lot better writer, but then I got cancer and now my brain leaves out lots of words when I write or replaces words with similar words. These days I find myself constantly re-editing comments to make them make sense because the first run misses a lot. Nobody knows anyone else’s story or why they might struggle with communication, and whether it’s a second language or losing your faculties due to disease and age, it’s not really something fair to ridicule others for. Cheers and keep up the good work, you look like you’re doing fine to me.
Source code is like the recipe to create a program. Compiling the source code is like cooking or baking a recipe.
You can look at the end result and attempt to reverse engineer how it was made, and might even be able to produce a copy that is indistinguishable from the original. Without the original recipe/source code, you’ll never know for sure if there is anything missing from your reproduction however.
Open source code is like a recipe that is posted freely online or otherwise openly distributed. Closed source code is like a proprietary recipe that is only known by one company/restaurant.
It means that you only have access to the compiled binaries of the program (the files on your system) and not to the source code.
Which means that you cannot see why and how the program functions the way it does. You can try and reverse engineer it or decompile it, but it will be different from the original code. As you stated, you can’t fork it either because you don’t have access to the original source control.Idk why but this close source stuff feels shady thanks for answering my question
That’s how most companies operate.
It’s interesting to have closed source for some use cases, (sensitive or top secrets programs for instance) but open source should definitely be the default rather than the exception in my opinion.
And with open source code, you have the right to copy and modify the code, and distribute your own copies of the original, or the modified code. Try that with closed source code and you’ll get a nice C&D shortly.
Well, that vastly depends on the license it’s under but yeah, that’s the gist of it !
Thanks but I dont generally trust Wikipedia and asking here and getting a good short answer is a lot easier
“When it comes to software and copyright law, I trust pseudonymous internet randos more than Wikipedia.”
Yes
Having some distrust in Wikipedia is healthy; you certainly shouldn’t take it as the final word about facts you’re depending on the accuracy of. But, it is very often a good starting point for learning about a new subject.
Spending a minute or two reading that “source code” article (or another version of it which is likely available in your first language) would give you a much better understanding of the concept of source code (which is a prerequisite for understanding what “closed source” means) than any of the answers in this thread so far.
Could you talk more on not trusting Wikipedia?
Well in my country it is heavily biased and wrong
Could you give an example?