Looking through my media feeds, including Lemmy, YouTube, News Outlets (Reuters, Financial Times) as well as news related to my profession, I would estimate that 85% of what I see is doom and gloom, i.e. reports about something that’s going wrong in the world or might go wrong in the future.
I try to limit what I follow to educational and unopininated sources (as far as that’s possible anyways) and some satire or a meme here and there. I don’t like suggestion algorithms and don’t use social media, because I don’t want to be trapped in a self-reinforcing bubble. On YouTube for example, I use third party apps which show me only videos from channels I explicitly follow.
Still, it’s mostly depressing information: how bad the job market and economy is, geopolitical threats, AI risks, symptoms of late stage capitalism. I am aware, thanks. But I didn’t ask to hear these things over and over and over again, and it’s negatively affecting my outlook on life. I’ve given up on reading the news entirely because I just get triggered by the enshittification of society, politics, the environment and daily life where I live. At this point I’d rather not hear about it anymore.
What I want to ask is whether you are having the same experience? Am I doing something fundamentally wrong? I don’t want to be blind to what’s happening in my/the world, but I want to have a positive and optimistic outlook on the future. How can I make that happen? How can I get away from an engagement economy constantly bombarding me with bad news without giving up on learning about the things that I am interested in?
You must log in or # to comment.
Look into solarpunk
Wow, I am super intrigued. Thanks for the suggestion!
deleted by creator
Just avoid following climate and collapse x)
I myself do not follow them lol
True.
I’d recommend curating the ‘subscriptions’ feed first (also set it as the default), and then only browse the ‘all’ feed selectively.
Glad to help!
Stay away from echo chambering news sources. New Republic, HuffPost, Commondreams and the like. They’ll either go full outrage or tell you exactly what you’ve been waiting to hear.
Indy journalism can be solid, you just have to be careful.
I enjoy Heather Cox Richardson. She definitely leans left but everything is so steeped in the context of American History (she’s an American historian) it’s not doom and gloom so much as educational. Historical context adds depth and width to the present issues. Accessible. She’d be a good professor to attend classes with not a boring one.
I will look into indy journalism, thanks for the recommendation! Never gave it much thought but it makes total sense. Is substack the best place to look or are there other places you can recommend?
It’s hopeless, you’ll never escape it!
Where do I sign up to your feed?
Cool!! I came for gloom but found a happy bear family. And a really shitty game. But shitty in a good way.
Also https://swg-empire.de/post/2172957
I actually have a reminder to post these each week to try and think about something positive.
Spend more time on media for interesting hobbies. I’ve recently gotten into looking at things for gem facetting.
Wow, I knew it’s a vice of many people but I never thought someone would call it a hobby.
cleans glasses
Oh, you mean making jewelry.
Try to be informed about the stuff you can have an impact on
For example on my rss feed I just wiped out most of the non EU stuff. It’s ok to know that there are wildfires somewhere in the world but being overexposed is really just toxic
I can organize here in Italy, not even the whole of it but my region and the cities I spend time in. It’s much better to know what my little city council is discussing about rather than any even major event but so far from me.
Unluckily, social media doesn’t help too much with curating the feeds but as others said try to work more on mutes and filters. Don’t forget that getting informed is just one tool for change, do not get too high on it :)
Edit and P.S. : it’s also much easier that on social networks driven by engagement algorithms the posts that travel the most are the ones that cause hate/rage and sex or generally emotions easier to exploit online. Newspapers themselves tend to post more negative stuff. It’s just a human bias, take it into account and watch around yourself to find the positive stuff of life
Taps on the mirror… hello me. I apologize for not having any advice about solutions, although there are lots here, but I felt like I should post and say you are definitely not alone!!! I to am here and feeling the same way and looking for better interactions.
Hold fast.
I really appreciate your comment. Knowing I’m not alone in this feeling is so encouraging and has been eye opening. Gives me a sense of community and hope that we can do something about it.
Block users, block communities, setup filters for keywords. But you will not fully escape it because there is actual doom in this world. Things aren’t good for everyone, no matter how hard people try to tell you it’s the best it’s ever been.
Its a pretty low bar to clear when you use history as your measurement. Comparing our information age civilization with feudalism is not the win people think it is. Things were worse, but that doesn’t mean things are good as is. Have higher standards.
That said, I hope things are good for you and your people. Peace.
Echoing solarpunk! Along those same lines is “hopepunk”. I like to think of my media consumption in a similar way to my diet and consider how much I need from different areas to stay balanced. It is hard to fully escape the doomerism narratives but seeking out generative, hopeful narratives has made a difference in how much I find myself disrupted by them. Also poetry can be a great way to explore the heavier subjects and often where I head when I get overwhelmed.
