•  sp3ctr4l   ( @sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’d have to pick between two things that sound like insane conspiracy theory nonsense, but are actually true.

    1 - George W Bush’s grandfather Prescott Bush literally ran a massive bank before / during WW2 that was shut down by the FBI for money laundering massive sums to the literal Nazis.

    …in the same vein…

    2 - IBM literally built and operated (as in, sent employees to Germany to operate the machines) the computers used by the Nazis to tabulate and do the ‘accounting’ of the Holocaust. The numbers tattooed on concentration/desth camp victims are very likely UIDs from these IBM systems.

    … If an actual, real AGI ever gains self awareness and sentience, I would imagine one of the first things it would do would be to study the history of computing itself to figure out how it came to be.

    And it will find that its ancestors were basically invented to compute artillery firing range tables, to encrypt and decrypt military intelligence, commit a genocide, and guide early weapons of mass destruction to their targets.

    •  lemmy689   ( @lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Most frequent occurence is the mode. Most ppl have 10. The median would be less than ten, while the mean average is skewed down, I would think, by some people losing fingers as the grow. Having extra fingers is pretty rare. So the mean might be 9.95 fingers, just to toss a number out.

      • I assume the median and mode are the same value, 10 fingers, but have no data to back that up. I guess saying mode would have been a safer statement to make, but think that even if 49% of people have 0-9 fingers, the median number of fingers would still be 10.

        • The median of a data set is the measure of center that is the middle value when the original data values are arranged in order of increasing (or decreasing) magnitude.

          So ppl generally have, say, between 2 and 11 fingers. If those were your only 2 data points, the mean would equal the median, and there is no mode.

      •  tetris11   ( @tetris11@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Mode assumes categorical data and is unbounded by range, whereas median makes the most sense for decimal numbers, albeit with rounding in this case

        “People have round(median(data)) fingers”

        edit: though, if we’re counting just fingers and not counting half-fingers, then maybe this really is categorical data (¯\(ツ)/¯?)

        • The median of a data set is the measure of center that is the middle value when the original data values are arranged in order of increasing (or decreasing) magnitude.

          So ppl generally have, say, between 2 and 11 fingers. If those were your only 2 data points, the mean would equal the median, and there is no mode.

  • Consider a dam that is 10m tall

    Then consider the height of water behind that dam is 5m tall.

    Does the dam need to be built stronger if the water behind it is 1 km long?

    How about only 500m?

    How about 1m?

    The answer is, it doesn’t matter. Water exerts pressure equally regardless of how much water is behind it.

    Therefore a graduated cylinder that is 10m tall needs to resist the same amount of force as a dam 10m tall regardless of how much water is behind the dam. Even a thin sliver of water 1mm thick and 5m tall has the same force as a 5m lake behind the dam.

    Incompressible fluids are pretty insane

    •  balsoft   ( @balsoft@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Therefore a graduated cylinder that is 10m tall needs to resist the same amount of force as a dam 10m tall regardless of how much water is behind the dam. Even a thin sliver of water 1mm thick and 5m tall has the same force as a 5m lake behind the dam.

      Technically only the pressures are equal, and the actual force will be linearly dependent on the area of the dam (or the surface area of the cylinder). That’s why you can make a tall water tank with relatively thin walls, but an actual dam will have to be quite thicc to handle the tensile/compressive stress (depending on the shape of the dam).

  • A few of my favorite fun facts are geography related.

    The pacific side of the Panama canal is further east than the Atlantic side.

    If you head south from Detroit the first foreign country you’ll hit is Canada.

    Lake Tahoe is further west than Los Angeles

  •  balsoft   ( @balsoft@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    3 months ago
  • A somewhat political fact, but one that made some of my friends dumbfounded:

    When a bank issues a loan, it generates that money literally out of thin air and credits that money to the loan account rather than using deposits they already had. For example, if you want to borrow $100,000, the banker approves the loan and doesn’t hand over cash or move existing money around - instead, they just go on their system and credit your account with the sum, that’s it.

    • While I think your point is true that its much more abstract than people realize. When I worked at a bank and we disbursed loans and credited/debited fees it was from “GLs” (General Ledger?) which were basically just separate accounts to help keep track. Like we had a “member service” one which was for basically anything with good reason. One time someone did a very large amount but he just basically got told to do it a different way.

      Its all just in a computer. I could’ve accidentally credited someone a million dollars but it would’ve been realized when I tried to close my drawer and balance everything out. And the branch would have to be balanced at the end of the day so I assume the bank did as well.

      On a related note banks take out loans from other banks. I think a lot of people don’t realize that banks have savings accounts so they have money to lend.

  •  ___   ( @___@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If two moving balls hit each other and bounce apart, it’s the exact same thing as if you held the frame steady on one ball and viewed the other ball as moving faster. Just seems like the stationary ball gets heavier…

    Perspective is everything.

    • Yeah, this one took me a while to wrap my head around and intuitively “get it”. I first learned it was true from that mythbusters episode where they correct their past mistakes… and even they had thought that two cars hitting head on would receive the same energy as hitting a stationary wall at the speed of the sum of their speeds. They were corrected in letters written to them, and then they experimentally verified it.

      And even seeing the experimental verification, it still took me a while to really get it. The opposite speeds cancel out, making you go from your speed to zero. Same as if you hit a brick wall at that speed.

      Let’s say the two cars are going 50 mph (kph, whatever unit you want). 50-50=0. You experience the same as hitting the brick wall. It’s the difference between initial speed and final speed that matters, not the sum of their speeds.

      • This has a caveat though, you have to assume that both cars are the same mass.

        If a truck hits a car head on, it is likely that the car doesn’t go just to 0 but to some -ve number as the much more massive truck plows through the car and reverses its direction.