JOMusic ( @JOMusic@lemmy.ml ) to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 months agoSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1248
arrow-up1248imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.ml JOMusic ( @JOMusic@lemmy.ml ) to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 months agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-square rcbrk ( @rcbrk@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoAnyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
minus-square Domi ( @domi@lemmy.secnd.me ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoAnyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes. I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon. If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.
Anyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
Anyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes.
I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon.
If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.