- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.zip
- bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org
themurphy ( @themurphy@lemmy.ml ) 51•16 days agoThis is literally step 1 in a dictatorship. Not kidding. Silencing of political opposition and critics in a free democracy? Nah.
Butterbee (She/Her) ( @Butterbee@beehaw.org ) English19•16 days agoFinally! This is what true freedom of speech looks like. Imagine being so free to say things and NEVER have to hear anyone oppose you.
Beej Jorgensen ( @beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org ) 19•16 days agoI generally agree, but I think we’re already past step 1.
TranquilTurbulence ( @TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip ) English23•16 days agoMussolini would be proud. His teachings are being followed a hundred years after he wrote the book on this topic.
TehPers ( @TehPers@beehaw.org ) English9•16 days agoTrump says a lot of things that, if taken in a certain light, can be NCII. Might be a good idea to flag his posts on all platforms so that they can be further investigated by those platforms if this passes.
All with the goal to keep NCII off the internet, of course.
PopeRigby ( @PopeRigby@beehaw.org ) English4•15 days agoNCII?
TehPers ( @TehPers@beehaw.org ) English4•15 days agoFrom the article:
While the bill is meant to address a serious problem—the distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII)
PopeRigby ( @PopeRigby@beehaw.org ) English1•15 days agoAh, must have missed that. Thanks.
SplashJackson ( @SplashJackson@lemmy.ca ) 1•15 days agoHow can the imagery be intimate if it’s non-consensual?
Phoenixz ( @phoenixz@lemmy.ca ) 1•15 days agoRevenge porn