Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
 misk   ( @misk@sopuli.xyz )  to Technology · 9 months ago

People are using Google's new AI model to remove watermarks from images

techcrunch.com

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • google@lemdro.id
105
external-link

People are using Google's new AI model to remove watermarks from images

techcrunch.com

 misk   ( @misk@sopuli.xyz )  to Technology · 9 months ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • google@lemdro.id
People are using Google's new AI model to remove watermarks from images | TechCrunch
techcrunch.com
external-link
People appear to be using Google's new Gemini model to remove watermarks from images, according to reports on social media.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  •  thejml   ( @thejml@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    So glad we’re destroying the environment and GPU market for this.

    •  uymai   ( @uymai@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      FWIW, Gemini doesn’t use nvidia chips I think, it’s their own thing— so just destroying the environment

      •  LandedGentry   ( @LandedGentry@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

      •  Chahk   ( @chahk@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Whew. Oh good. I got worried there for a moment.

  •  ABetterTomorrow   ( @ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sounds like laws should have been created before release.

  •  Mothra   ( @Mothra@mander.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ahh, great news, fellow artists and photographers. We don’t need to waste time watermarking our work anymore

  •  Jo Miran   ( @JoMiran@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I do that all the time for memes (watermarks or previous captions). It is literally the only useful thing I have found for the AI image editor in my phone.

    •  DoubleSpace   ( @DoubleSpace@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s good for removing offensive nipples too.

      •  Lime Buzz (fae/she)   ( @SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is this the new “female presenting nipples”? 🤣

  •  m-p{3}   ( @mp3@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I did it for some memes, not like I’m making money out of it.

    •  LandedGentry   ( @LandedGentry@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      •  GreyBeard   ( @greybeard@lemmy.one ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Depends on the watermark that is being removed. So many memes out there have random watermarks on them of some crappy facebook account or random website that has nothing to do with the content, they just slap their logo on everything they share.

        •  LandedGentry   ( @LandedGentry@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          •  GreyBeard   ( @greybeard@lemmy.one ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            I agree with your core point, if the watermark is a maker’s mark, then it would be wrong to remove it.

  •  Melody Fwygon   ( @fwygon@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    The solution to this is subtle and gentle amounts of 2D Perlin Noise, as well as a touch of Gaussian noise on and around the watermark as well.

    The more you can cloak the area around the watermark with subtly increasing amounts of noise; the harder it is for AI to manipulate it without mangling the image in general. (or leaving the watermark behind)

    Similarly; leaving smaller artifacts like small signatures or wordmarks embedded in the image also makes sense, particularly small signatures hugging things like lineart in inconspicuous places or hidden in places with intricate detail.

    Tools like Glaze and Nightshade also exist to “Poison” images at creation-time such that, if they go viral and get re-shared and AI remixed heavily, they won’t be as easily usable by AI models to knock off your works. Yes, this technique is ineffective for existing works, as an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. These tools use many different techniques beyond just subtly masking the entire image with multiple layers of imperceptible perlin noise. Which is a task that could take you several hours to get to looking right in your favorite image editing suite, as you’ll be poking and prodding and tweaking that slider to maximize protection while minimizing it’s visual perturbations.

    •  jcg   ( @jcg@halubilo.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      And so the AI war rages on

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 664 users / day
  • 1.64K users / week
  • 3.04K users / month
  • 6.6K users / 6 months
  • 5.07K local subscribers
  • 40.9K subscribers
  • 5.45K Posts
  • 97.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  •  Chris Remington   ( @remington@beehaw.org ) 
  •  alyaza [they/she]   ( @alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  •  gyrfalcon   ( @gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  •  rs5th   ( @rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  •  coldredlight   ( @coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  •  Leigh   ( @SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  •  TheRtRevKaiser   ( @TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code