What a cunt
Churbleyimyam ( @Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee ) 42•9 days ago“The cost of tax exemption for assets is devastating”
The next prime minister to say this fixes the economy. Go.
monogram ( @monogram@feddit.nl ) English39•9 days agoWould you like some Tory Light with your order?
I’ll take a main of Labour, hold the Labour and also, could you leave out all left please and add some extra ring wing, thanks!
Swedneck ( @Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ) 2•5 days agocon pizza with right wing
thefluffiest ( @thefluffiest@feddit.nl ) 38•9 days agoGood thing we can tax the billionaires then, now can’t we?
FundMECFS ( @FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 24•9 days agoI think he’s got the wrong part of devastating.
Cutting the meagre money
hundreds of thousandsmillions rely on to survive and surely causing excess deaths in the process is devastating. HumanPenguin ( @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ) English7•9 days agoMillions. But yeah agree entirly.
alykanas ( @alykanas@slrpnk.net ) English22•9 days agoA month ago he told us of his plans to “Unleash AI” To ‘increase efficiency’ - a phrase long proved synonymous with cutting jobs.
Would love to know what work he expects people to do when they’re kicked off sickness benefits.
Perhaps they will leave their wheelchairs behind and become bricklayers.
He is delivering a future inequality instead of alleviating it.
It’s all just so incoherent. I would settle for anyone who had the inclination to build functional society for the future, instead of the staid old ideas of slavish adherence to neoliberal economics. Academia is yelling out that they have seen the end of that road and it does not look good.
HumanPenguin ( @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ) English14•8 days ago"The cost of 0 VAT on financial services is devastating. "
And only used by the wealthy.
Why should someone who needs an accountants time get it tax free. But needing a plumbers time dose not.
Twig ( @Twig@sopuli.xyz ) English10•8 days agoIs there any chance of a rebellion within Labour over this?
apotheotic (she/her) ( @apotheotic@beehaw.org ) English9•9 days agoAbsolute fucking pig of a human.
als ( @als@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English9•9 days agoI’m sure there’s no other way to get more money into the government. No possible way.
Fluke ( @Fluke@lemm.ee ) 9•8 days agoDisabled and ill peons don’t hand out shares and consultancy jobs to politicians.
Disability benefit claimants can’t fight back with armies of lobbyists and lawyers, like the US based companies such as Amazon and Meta who not only avoid paying billions in tax every year, but get paid by UKgov to “invest in infrastructure” they need to profit from UK consumers.
“The Labour Party” are choosing to take from the poorest and most needy and give it to giant multinationals, as the Tories before them.
Fluke ( @Fluke@lemm.ee ) 5•7 days agoRelevant reading, published today 20/03/2025;
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmtrans/770/report.html
They know being disabled is harder, far more stressful, and more expensive, they simply don’t give a fuck.
Edit: They know way more than the horseshit they’re feeding us about it, and they refuse to publish the reports that poke holes in their excuses.
skozzii ( @skozzii@lemmy.ca ) 8•8 days agoDisabled people already don’t make enough to live off of,and they can’t do anything about it. They already live in poverty, how much do we want to make them suffer?
Going after them and adding more stress is just terrible.
He should be ashamed of himself. He is going to kill people, blood on his hands.
Zero22xx ( @Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English6•9 days agoHow much does this guy get paid?
futatorius ( @futatorius@lemm.ee ) 1•8 days agoThis is a terrible situation, since two unpleasant things are true at once: the benefits system is riddled with fraudulent claims and mismanagement, but there are also people with genuine disabilities who absolutely rely on these benefits.
the benefits system is riddled with fraudulent claims and mismanagement
whoisearth ( @whoisearth@lemmy.ca ) 4•8 days agoIt’s not. It’s a dog whistle by anyone opposed to social programs.
The reality is that, although there is abuse in all systems, the level of that abuse is negligible to the point of being a rounding error.
The goal is to punish everyone for the sake of that small percentage that abuses the system.
This is not unique to the UK it’s the same song and dance everywhere.
Fluke ( @Fluke@lemm.ee ) 6•8 days agoThe benefits system, relying as it does on privatisation from top to bottom, haemorrhages cash, this is truth.
Go find out how much actual cash goes in.
Then find out how much of that actually ends up in claimants’ hands.
Then, finally, realise the scale of the problem.
Fluke ( @Fluke@lemm.ee ) 4•8 days agoDid you know that if you’re renting, you can get that rent paid by benefit?
That rent goes to a landlord who uses that rent to pay the mortgage on the property, maintain it (lol), and some profit.
If, however, you “own” your home and are responsible for paying the mortgage and maintenance, the best you can get is a loan to cover the interest only. You must pay this loan back with interest if/when you sell your home.
They’ll happily pay over the odds for “rent” costs to landlords, but they won’t pay less than that to you for your mortgage.
They’re happy to pay a mortgage, just not to you, the benefit claimant.
The whole system is rigged to take from the poorest and filter it all to those who have more than enough.
HumanPenguin ( @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ) English1•8 days agoThis has nothing to do with this topic. I don’t disagree with your points. But removing the benefits designed to allow disabled to actually function in anything close to an equal manner. It is in no way going to help your issue.
And refusing to cover rental housing costs for the poorest members of our population. Without hugely increasing homelessness and death. Will require a huge investment in social housing and time. Long before the nation is ready to stop covering that cost.
But I agree that sort of move is needed. But that would require an electorate and political party willing to support it.
HumanPenguin ( @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ) English2•8 days agothe benefits system is riddled with fraudulent claims
If this was true. These actions in no way address such claims. They are purely about making it harder for genuine claims to actually pass the process, and paying less to those that remain. Absolutely nothing in this plan addresses false/fraudulent claims.
Also, while some fraudulent claims exist, riddled is totally false. The Tories have spent their whole time in office trying to prove your statement. Yet the cost of implementing their extra checks has been hugely more expensive than any claims cancelled.
You like much of the nation have fallen for the media and channel 4 propaganda.