Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · edit-21 year agoThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square74linkfedilinkarrow-up183file-text
arrow-up183external-linkThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comChris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · edit-21 year agomessage-square74linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMudMan ( MudMan@fedia.io ) linkfedilinkarrow-up21·1 year agoReally? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
minus-squareChris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) OPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year ago You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? No. That feels a bit patronizing. That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
minus-squareThevenin ( Thevenin@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
minus-squareMudMan ( MudMan@fedia.io ) linkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoPatronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal. He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.
Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
No.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
Patronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal.
He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.