- They drove there in their own vehicle
- They were seen on CCTV cameras going there and back
- They turned off their phones around the time when the tree was cut down
- They filmed it being cut down
- They took a photo of a piece of the tree in the back of their car
- They discussed it over text messages and voice notes as the media coverage picked up
- They pled not guilty 🤣
They’re also experienced tree fellers. Couldn’t make it up.
Have you ever dealt with the court of law? You always plead *not* guilty. Always.
There are very, very few scenarios where you dont.
Edit: lmao
I was a juror on a trial and the guy involved clearly was several chicken nuggets short of a happy meal, like these two, there was mountains of evidence against him including body cam footage from a police officer, and he still pleaded not guilty.
By the way his defence essentially amounted to, there were other people in the area who also had criminal records, so maybe they did it.
you mean you always plead not guilty, don’t you?
Bruh. How did i miss that lmao
What depressed me most about the loss of the sycamore is nobody would ever face consequences for it. I figured it would be impossible to prove.
But I’ll be damned the morons recorded themselves doing it. What the actual fuck. How do people this dim exist?
Looks like only two of them are facing consequences; the other one seems to be getting off scot-free.
This is the sort of crime that putting people in public stocks should be brought back for.
Imagine these two pieces of shit locked in a pillory, at the site of the felled tree, while thousands of people queue up to tell them what seawards they are.
Why am I not surprised that he looks like thisWhatever sentence they get will be a slap on the wrist. For some reason white dudes destroying ancient history is never punished very harshly.
so… why? why did they cut it down?
Looks like they just did it for a laugh
From voice messages between them in the days after the felling, having something they did become a news item may have had some allure.
Though why they’d want that so badly, and why they’d opt for destroying an ancient sycamore & damaging part of Hadrian’s wall to obtain such attention is another matter.
Land wasn’t theirs, they didn’t live near it nor on land which people cross to visit the tree. They didn’t take the wood. Nothing has emerged to suggest they did it on behalf of someone else.
The pair went out on a stormy winter night, making a special trip to fell the tree, and leaving shortly after. Despite the darkness & lashing rain, one made a very grainy video recording of the other felling the tree with a chainsaw.
So far, they are pleading not guilty, so it’ll be interesting to see whether they raise a defence or merely introduce doubts about the reliability of the evidence brought against them.
Idk, I feel it could have been an induction ritual for some group they hope(d) to join, or flagging up their willingness to conduct sabotage operations for hire, but more likely an unfortunate dissociation from reality caused by viewing the world and their own lives through the distorting lens of social media.
Attending the hearing yesterday, one had his face & hair entirely concealed as he passed press photographers waiting outside, which doesn’t fit with a craving for fame. The only footage presented by the news of the other man was taken at a court appearance for an unrelated matter a few weeks ago - it isn’t clear whether he somehow escaped their attention yesterday, or simply hadn’t attended.
It’s starting to sound plausible that not even they know why they did it.
Testosterone?
tree destroyed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sycamore_Gap_tree
The stump has thrown up seedlings and is still alive, albeit severely coppiced, but is expected to take more than 150 years to recover.
May or may not wind up quite as photogenic, but with apologies to Mark Twain, the reports of its death have been greatly exaggerated.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/sycamore-gap-tree-newcastle-crown-court-b2737600.html
Saplings from the tree are being grown and will be planted at sites across the UK, with the first already gifted to King Charles for planting in Windsor Great Park this winter. Shoots have also emerged from the base of the Sycamore Gap tree.
The landmark is still destroyed. A stump isn’t the same. What made the tree special was because it was pretty.
Yeah, but I mean, it’s probably far from being the only pretty tree in the country.
It sounds like it became a thing due to being in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-66994729
While a popular spot for walkers and photographers due to its unusual setting, it became famous after featuring in the 1991 film Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves starring Kevin Costner. Afterwards it gained the nickname the Robin Hood Tree - although in reality it was some 170 miles (273 km) from Sherwood Forest.
It looks like there’s a new Robin Hood movie coming out (The Death of Robin Hood), and IMDB says that the filming is in the UK and Northern Ireland (well…should probably be Great Britain and Northern Ireland, but whatever). Maybe they can find themselves another nice tree in the UK for filming. Maybe the National Trust or some council that wants a famous tree can point 'em in the appropriate direction.
…maybe use an oak or yew or something even more long-lived and historically-accurate too, as the sycamore is an import…
http://www.mikepalmer.co.uk/woodyplantecology/sycamore/greatbritain.htm
Jones (1944) found that the first definite record of sycamore in England is that of Lyte in 1578, but suggests that it is probable that it was introduced to Scotland at a slightly earlier date. Some workers have argued that the Romans could have introduced it, but no conclusive evidence can be found (Bleay 1987). Sycamore remained rare around houses and in hedges though by the 17th and 18th centuries nursery records show stocking and sale of young sycamores (Bleay 1987). However, it was not extensively planted until the late 18th century (Jones 1944).
That first record of introduction is centuries after King Richard the Lionheart was running around.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_I_of_England
Reign: 3 September 1189 – 6 April 1199
Robin Hood was supposed to be a contemporary figure of King Richard, so he probably wouldn’t have been spending time around sycamores…
deleted by creator
Don’t think I’ve felt this sad about a tree. Had been there hundreds of years before these blokes were born, it’s good they’re on trial at least.
edit correction 150 year old tree, could’ve sworn it was older, but my point stands.
Mr Graham, from Carlisle, and Mr Carruthers, of Wigton, Cumbria, have each denied two counts of criminal damage.
Why am I not surprised. 'ang 'em!!!
'ang 'em!!!
Might be better to have them plant more trees along Hadrian’s Wall, if people enjoy said trees. Turn the affair into a net positive for people who will be eventually walking along the wall in the future.
Who do these clowns think they are, Mitchells & Butlers?
