Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 ( Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year ago

Telegram is indistinguishable from an FSB honeypot

rys.io

external-link
message-square
14
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • Tech@europe.pub
  • technology
49
external-link

Telegram is indistinguishable from an FSB honeypot

rys.io

Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 ( Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
14
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • Tech@europe.pub
  • technology
Many people who focus on information security, including myself, have long considered Telegram suspicious and untrustworthy. Now, based on findings published by the investigative journalism outlet ISt
  • herseycokguzelolacak ( herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just above you said “You’re even better off using WhatsApp”.

    I will use Signal if Signal devs get over their hate of F-Droid.

    • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 ( Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re better off using WhatsApp compared to Telegram, but that’s a very low bar, and it absolutely doesn’t mean that anyone should use WhatsApp. Signal, Threema, Wire and SimpleX are far better options. I prefer Signal, because it’s very easy to use, the UI/UX is basically the exact same as on WhatsApp. It’s also free, unlike Threema, and uses either phone numbers or user names as identifiers, unlike SimpleX, which requires you to share a QR code. Signal is also the most popular of these messengers, so there’s a larger chance that someone is already using it.

      As for F-Droid: It’s not a good way of distributing such privacy/security-relevant apps like Signal. F-Droid doesn’t have certificate checks built in, thus the APK could easily be modified without the user ever noticing. Again, I don’t like Google, but you’re better off downloading Signal from the Play Store. The best option is to use Obtainium and automatically fetch the latest version of the Signal APK directly from their website https://signal.org/android/apk/ That way, you’re at least getting the app from an official source, built and signed by the Signal developers, not a random third party.

      You can use AppVerifier to verify the integrity of the downloaded app aginast the certificate fingerprint on the website.

      • herseycokguzelolacak ( herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t trust an app that tells me to download from Google Play. Sorry, not going to happen. Signal has too many red flags.

        • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 ( Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t trust an app that tells me to download from Google Play.

          So almost any Android app in existence?

          • herseycokguzelolacak ( herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, but an app like Signal claiming to care about privacy should at least make an effort to be on the largest open source appstore. The fact they don’t, despite very loud complaints from the community, makes me question their commitment to privacy and security.

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 ( Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Again, I just explained to you that the “largest open source app store” is an insecure mess and isn’t suited for apps like Signal. You don’t need to use Google Play, you can find the APK on GitHub, or the Signal website, together with the certificate fingerprint.

              makes me question their commitment to privacy and security.

              That doesn’t make sense. F-Droid neither secure nor trustworthy. Signal not being on F-Droid is a good security choice. I recommend reading through this thread.

              • herseycokguzelolacak ( herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Signal devs accuse f-droid for not being secure, but do not offer any convincing arguments to back it up. Just saying it doesn’t make it so.

                F-Droid works. I have 20+ apps installed on my phone from F-Droid. I am not going to go back to installing apks from website or Google Play just so that I can use Signal.

                • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 ( Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I linked you to a whole page of evidence, explaining the significant security issues in F-Droid before.

                  Here’s that link again: https://privsec.dev/posts/android/f-droid-security-issues/

                  Just read it

                  • herseycokguzelolacak ( herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml ) 
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I read that article and had a good laugh about it. It is nonsensical. It does raise good points occasionally, but that is drowned by nonsense.

Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don’t be a smartass and try to game the system, we’ll know if you’re breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don’t promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. “They already have my data, why bother?”)
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

  • !opensource@programming.dev
  • !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
  • !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 86 users / day
  • 796 users / week
  • 1.03K users / month
  • 3.17K users / 6 months
  • 32 local subscribers
  • 6.24K subscribers
  • 1.01K Posts
  • 5.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Otter ( otter@lemmy.ca ) 
  • shaytan ( shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code