Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to Technology · 1 year ago

Google loses $314 million lawsuit over data transfers when Android phones are idle

m.gsmarena.com

external-link
message-square
11
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • android@lemdro.id
64
external-link

Google loses $314 million lawsuit over data transfers when Android phones are idle

m.gsmarena.com

sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to Technology · 1 year ago
message-square
11
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • android@lemdro.id
A group in California alleged that these transfers were harming users - and the jury agreed. Now there is a separate lawsuit for the other 49 US states.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Gaywallet (they/it) ( Gaywallet@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    314m what a joke! Still, good to see them lose this court case

    • Kacarott ( Kacarott@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it could be repeated 49 times, that might start to add up a little

  • Scrubbles ( scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always nice to see a positive outcome, let’s hope they lose the appeal.

    • Powderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hate that this is how our legal system has evolved. Trial courts mean nothing when a corporation loses, because invariably an appeal is filed, and if the circuit court upholds a ruling, well, time to talk to SCOTUS.

      • BeardedGingerWonder ( BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d prefer to lose the right to appeal?

        • Powderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not at all … it’s just that corporations, unwilling to take no for an answer, have functionally unlimited funds to throw toward several rounds of escalating court cases while defendants … don’t. It creates an inherently lopsided situation the legal system wasn’t explicitly designed for, but now this is just standard.

          Companies walk into these trials essentially seeing the first round as a rehearsal.

          • BeardedGingerWonder ( BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t the appellate court only accept the case if there’s an issue with the ruling in a lower court? It’s absolutely loaded, but it’s hard to see an alternative without giving up the right to appeal.

            • Powderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not the ruling itself, but corporations file all sorts of motions before and during the initial trial specifically so that if a motion is denied, voila! Now the jury verdict and compensation decision isn’t what they’re challenging, but rather technical aspects from rulings by the judge overseeing the trial court … admission or inadmission of evidence is always a popular one.

              To suggest that anyone else has the sort of law firms on retainer to play this game all the way to the top is folly. It’s just another way in which the system is rigged.

  • Geodad ( Geodad@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • arthur ( arthur@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does banking apps work on your cellphone?

      • Scrath ( Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not OP but I’m also running GrapheneOS. After some initial difficulty I had with one of my banking apps I got everything to work just fine.

        What does not work unfortunately is paying via google wallet or revolut.

      • Geodad ( Geodad@beehaw.org ) deleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • Novaling ( Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really just depends, one of my banking apps doesn’t work, but another bank’s app does work. When it comes to payment apps, I only use PayPal, which unfortunately doesn’t work for me either. They have a long GitHub list keeping track of what apps have been reported to be working.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 158 users / day
  • 529 users / week
  • 1.61K users / month
  • 4.8K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.8K subscribers
  • 6.47K Posts
  • 108K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code