Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sunshine ( Sunshine@piefed.ca )  to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 1 year ago

The EU could be scanning your private chats by October 2025 [Denmark has reintroduced chat control]

www.techradar.com

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • europe@feddit.org
  • europe@feddit.org
95
external-link

The EU could be scanning your private chats by October 2025 [Denmark has reintroduced chat control]

www.techradar.com

Sunshine ( Sunshine@piefed.ca )  to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
15
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • europe@feddit.org
  • europe@feddit.org
The EU still wants to scan all your chats – and the rules could come into force by October 2025
www.techradar.com
external-link
Chat Control is back on the lawmakers' table
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Subdivide6857 ( Subdivide6857@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, yeah. This is more of that western freedom I’ve been hearing aboot.

  • doctortofu ( doctortofu@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are never going to give up. Ever. Not until the techbros who bribe them to sell more surveillance tech die out, but it’s going to be too late then. Nothing makes these assholes more excited than creating a techno-feudal dystopia.

  • Libb ( Libb@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surprise?

    Maybe more people will start realize that, even more so in our so perfectly democratic societies, digital/online privacy and intimacy have very little future (and that’s the very optimistic version).

  • paulbg ( paulbg@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    trust me bro it’s for your safety💀

  • Blaze ( Blaze@piefed.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn it

  • jherazob ( jherazob@fedia.io ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    These goddamned fucks

  • Petter1 ( Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time to use matrix, I guess

    • Sunshine ( Sunshine@piefed.ca ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Decentralize baby!

    • Subdivide6857 ( Subdivide6857@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Matrix with muh fam for a few years, and it’s been great.

      My significant other puts up with my shenanigans and tests out different apps with me, and SimpleX has been pretty decent for a server-less option. I believe you can host your own node if you feel inclined to.

      XMPP would be fantastic if the clients were a little better. They’re by no means bad, just not as polished as Element.

    • Hirom ( Hirom@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technology cannot solve purely political problems.

      • Petter1 ( Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        But, it can prevent political problems hurting my privacy…
        And there is nothing they can do against it.

        If they force matrix to insert a backdoor, I just use a fork without it.

        If they force my Linux distributor to add a backdoor, I just use a fork without it.

        If they force a backdoor in iOS and Android, I use a fork of open source android or mainline linux for phones, without it.

        If they want to hang me because I do such things, I riot.

        • Hirom ( Hirom@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          These technical workarounds may work for a little while, and are useful to some extent.

          But they’re not long term solutions for a government that regularly increase its surveillance powers at the expanse of privacy.

          China and Russia reached a level of surveillance and repression where people may get arrested for merely using Matrix/VPN/Tor, regarless of what it’s used for.

          Political action is a better way to address bad politics before it reaches this point. This could include voting, activism, supporting privacy-friendly NGOs…

          Waiting until the last moment and then rioting isn’t the best option.

          • Petter1 ( Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair argument, which I agree on 😇

  • redsunrise ( redsunrise@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Carrier pigeons didn’t have government backdoors. Maybe we ought to go back to them

  • july ( july@leminal.space ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Would Signal be affected by this?

    If yes, what’s the move: Matrix or self host my own chat for my family?

Privacy@programming.dev

privacy@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@programming.dev

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 109 users / day
  • 377 users / week
  • 1.5K users / month
  • 3.8K users / 6 months
  • 34 local subscribers
  • 5.22K subscribers
  • 1.89K Posts
  • 6.86K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ategon ( Ategon@programming.dev ) 
  • danielintempesta ( danielintempesta@programming.dev ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code