I see the trailer, I don’t think is the best serie in the world, but I think can be something fun to watch, to nowdays standards that is enough to me really.

I need to watch it to have an opinion, I have the feeling people need to give a chance at least, I did with Voyager despite all the negative critics I saw.

What you think about this?

  • It’s the internet. There’s going to be “backlash” regardless.

    Though to be honest, people seem pretty high on SFA, both here an in other online spaces I visit.

    I think there’s a lot of potential in the concept, and the trailer looked great.

    Either way, I’d much rather talk about the show than the people talking about the show.

  • We’ve seen basically nothing of it other than a short trailer, so it’s way too early for anyone to be deciding whether it’ll be good or not! I’m planning to give it a try, just like I have with every other Trek show so far. If I like it, I’ll continue watching. If I don’t, I won’t!

  • dax ( dax@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, after Picard and Discovery I’m pretty much done with “New Trek”, I’ve lost my interest. For this I’m not even the target audience - this seems aimed at teens / young adults. And it’s once again produced by Alex Kurzman. So… yeah, I’m gonna give it a pass.

      • dax ( dax@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, I may not have given SNW the chance it deserved. I’ve watched all 3 seasons of Picard though and almost 2 seasons of Discovery

      • dax ( dax@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me, Star Trek was mostly about a possible brighter future. Humanity overcame the issues on earth, no longer relies on money/capitalism, etc. When your watch the crew on TNG, they are acting professionally and with a code of ethics.

        Discovery is so miserable. Everyone is angry all the time, there’s racism, lots of unnecessary drama, people acting extremely unprofessionally. Same with Picard. Especially sour about how they made one of the best characters - Q - also very serious and miserable. He could’ve been the comedic relief the series needed, without undermining the rest of the story. The “Picard speeches” are just badly written too, so whimsical and empty.

        We have a million dystopian Sci-fi series already, why do we need more? I feel writers are no longer able to tell compelling stories without fake drama. It’s possible to engage with modern day issues in a different way, especially by showing how to be better.

    • I was hardly the target audience for Lower Decks; in fact, I was a little mad they had made an adult animated Star Trek comedy. However, after watching it, it has become a favorite. Season 1 is a bit difficult to get through, but once you get through that, overall, it’s a show that’s very sincere to what Star Trek is while still being a comedy. And it should have gotten 2 more seasons.

      Same with Star Trek: Prodigy: it takes a second, and it’s still technically a kids show, but when it gets there, it’s worth it.

      Honestly, I’m half hopeful for the show just because it’s a “We’re going for the {X} demographic” kind of show that sounds a little like a stupid idea that will actually turn out unexpectedly good but get cancelled before its time.

    • ijhoo ( ijhoo@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same for me.

      Just saw jem Hadar in the star fleet in this trailer? What?

      I see them prioritizing:

      1. Diversity and political correctness
      2. Special effects
      3. Dramatic feel / grandiose feel

      …

      1. Storyline

      Kurzman really destroyed trek.

      I will see what comes out in the first 3 episodes, but as with discovery, I have extremely little expectations. Discovery ruined new trek for me: still cannot get over the mushroom drive and waterbear providing maps by shocking it with electricity, constantly whispering and whining of the main character, another crybaby destroyed dilithium in the galaxy because he has a ‘connection’… Take your pick

      They do have some good casting, like Tig Notaro. Hope there are other good ones as well.

      • usernamefactory ( usernamefactory@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just saw jem Hadar in the star fleet in this trailer? What?

        Why is that a problem? In TOS, Klingons were the enemy, then TNG brought us Worf. In TNG, the Ferengi were the enemy, then in DS9 Nog joined up. Star Trek is all about coming together and overcoming differences.

        I see them prioritizing:

        1. Diversity and political correctness

        I wish. They’ve cancelled all the shows with queer representation. SNW has about a hundred relationships going on, all straight. I miss Disco and Lower Decks.

      • Every time I see a ‘Kurtzman bad’ post, I think about the molesting of female actors that Rick Berman did. I think of the power hungry swings of manipulation he wielded over anyone who tried to leave.

        I think of Maurice Hurley, who got McFadden fired on false pretences because she dared to stand up to his sexist shit.

        I think of Gene Roddenberry, of his persistent meddling and manipulation. Of his theft of ideas and royalties. Of the fact that he is almost certainly the attempted rapist of the era.

        Get the fuck over yourselves. ‘I dont like Kurtzman’s story ideas’ puts him leagues ahead of the literal legacy of sex offenders that ran the show before.

  • Nico198X ( Nico_198X@europe.pub ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    there’s ALWAYS backlash today. we live in a hate-filled world driven by a rage-fueled economy.

    only a tiny portion of the critique is legitimate. the rest is overblown, disingenuous nonsense.

  • rogermccoy ( rogermccoy@startrek.website ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the same dumb cycle that’s happened with every new Trek show since TNG (and probably TAS). It’s tiresome, but at least it’s predicable, I guess? Just ignore the obligatory backlash and see how it turns out.

  • Commander Arex ( arex@startrek.website ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I certainly wasn’t expecting it to take place after Discovery, I thought it would be around the same time as Prodigy. I guess restarting the academy after The Burn could be more interesting, either way, I’m looking forward to seeing it.

  • Lumidaub ( Lumidaub@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything gets a “backlash” on the internet. If it says Star Trek on it, I’m going to at least try it. That easy.

    (Disclaimer: Unless it’s absolutely blatantly not Star Trek. And even then I might be curious. Section 31 was difficult.)

  • Jo Miran ( JoMiran@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I can say about the trailer is that it took me less than five seconds to recognize Holly Hunter once she began to speak. Such a distinctive voice. Even if it sucks, I’m giving it a shot because of her.

  • I haven’t noticed much backlash, though I’m sure you can find some in the usual discontented corners of the internet. Personally I’m optimistic, but we really don’t have all that much information yet. The trailer mostly sold the tone, but it seemed like the right tone.

  • I think part of it is people are so annoyed with entertainment companies in general that it’s hard to know if you’re worried about something real about the show or you’re just fatigued.

    Also, personally, I feel like people have actually been relatively quiet about STA, although maybe it’s just the community I’m in. Personally, with headlines about Robert Picardo’s character being “deeper”, I’m almost certain he’ll be 100% comic relief, and the show may be unexpectedly good, if Star Trek: Prodigy is anything to judge by.

    Mostly, I just hope they don’t do the most basic Klingon plot they can think of - I think it would be great if the Qo’nos Klingons were relatively well off post-burn due to a philosophical shift, but they’ll probably have something like they were devastated by civil war after possibly being a Federation member.

    EDIT: I mean, almost all of the better newer series have been forays into a genre - LD adult animated comedy and PRO children’s drama. If STA’s trying to aim towards a tween/teen niche, maybe it will also follow that. The only one to break the pattern is S31 somewhat, in the sense it was an action movie attempt, but still within the general sci-fi drama standard of Trek.

  • OHHH wait I remember this conversation from Disco, lemme see if I can still do the spiel.

    I think it’s good if it brings more fans to series and in a way I envy the idea of them wanting more Star Trek and finding out about TNG, DS9 and VOY.

    • Many of us used to say the same about TNG, DS9 and Voyager bringing fans to TOS, TAS and the TOS movies.

      But others of us just tried to give each show a chance to become favourites on their own merits.

      In terms of the GenZs in our household, who had seen all the classic series by the end of middle school, the new shows have superceded their old favourites. One’s really into animated Trek, another loves Discovery. Star Trek Online has also played a role in retaining interest in the franchise.