• Similar stuff happening in India lol. They banned like 850 porn sites in 2018 but didn’t just stop there. Every year there are waves of “porn bans” and most recently they banned redgifs as well. Almost like certain authorities are fixated on porn.

        • tal ( tal@lemmy.today ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          I expect Dame Rachel will be subsequently calling for age verification on providers of VPSes and physical servers when she’s made aware that anyone might just set up their own VPN server on any of those. And on anyone providing OpenSSH access, since that can provide a tunnel to an integrated SOCKS server. Then the Tor network — and given that that’s noncommercial and since US-based nodes aren’t doing business in the UK, the US at least doesn’t recognize UK jurisdiction over US Tor nodes and isn’t going to enforce anything against them.

          I expect that there are quite a few others.

            • tal ( tal@lemmy.today ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 年前

              Nah, those are individual states.

              EDIT: To clarify: the bounds on legal jurisdiction aren’t tied to policy on pornography or anything like that. They just state that there are machines that the UK can’t make legal rules for. The UK could try blocking traffic to them on the UK’s side, but the US won’t enforce rules against them.

              For that to not be a loophole regarding the UK, the US would have to have identical policy on age verification for social media in all of the US. But in the US, age verification law on social media is something that is set at a state level.

  • tal ( tal@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 年前

    “This tells us how much of the problem is about the design of platforms, algorithms and recommendation systems that put harmful content in front of children who never sought it out,” the commissioner said, calling for the report to act as a “line in the sand”.

    From the report text:

    Content warning
    This report is not intended to be read by children.
    This report makes frequent reference to sexual harassment and sexual violence. This includes descriptions of pornographic content, language and discussion of sexual abuse.

    By the commissioner’s standard, the commission’s report itself should probably be behind an age-gated access method or at least not indexed by Google.