Kinda makes sense why he lied and deleted my comment for “genocide denial” previously. Makes it easier to ban someone down the line and have it seem justified. Apparently, I’m simultaneously denying a genocide and engaging in apologia.

Don’t forget everyone:

  1. Criticising a mod == genocide apologia.
  2. Disputing a regular poster to a mods comm about Hasan using his own clip == genocide denial.

Preemptively for all the idiots who played right into this guys hands last time, didn’t deny the genocide in Palestine and still don’t.

  • Zomg ( Zomg@piefed.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get the feeling YDI. Either way, you come off as the type of person that just wants to argue with strangers, I see plenty of insults in your comments; idiot, moron, etc. I’d probably just ban you for that behavior alone.

  • Preemptively for all the idiots who played right into this guys hands last time, didn’t deny the genocide in Palestine and still don’t.

    You are calling people that don’t deny the Palestinian genocide idiots. I would ban you too wtf…

    • CTDummy ( CTDummy@aussie.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No I am not. If you actually read, I’m calling the people like mrdown here an idiot. The ones that just see “genocide denial” and attack someone while completely ignoring that they didn’t do that. How or why would I claim to not be denying the genocide and then call those that don’t deny it idiots?

        • CTDummy ( CTDummy@aussie.zone ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Come on dude, words have meanings

          They do and I’ve told you that your “interpretation” is incorrect. Again, the sentence was for people who did nothing but attempts at personal attacks and name calling on the last post Glad to clear that up for you.

  • It is incredibly easy to accuse someone of being a genocide apologist if you want people to rally against them. I think there is some kind of human psychology thing there, where there is an “enemy” box that gets checked in the head which applies to that person, and then if they try to explain that they actually don’t support or apologize for genocide, then it doesn’t matter because that person’s bad now, and they’re lying.

    You’re all good. TokenBoomer is making wild accusations to be able to smear you, for reasons of their own, it seems pretty clear here.

    • CTDummy ( CTDummy@aussie.zone ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Appreciate the reply as I was pretty frustrated by the responses I got. I even explicitly (in other comment and dm to Token) made it clear I don’t deny the genocide, made no difference. Anyway, thanks again.

      • I think there are a lot of accounts on Lemmy that make a little cottage industry out of making accusations of genocide apologia any time they want to vilify someone. I think they also have multiple accounts (or coordinate between themselves), so that it’s a tide of people making the same bizarro-logic attack, which of course other people then join in on because groupthink. As you’ve experienced it is pretty effective. Chin up lad, you’re fine, they’re just being dishonest and vicious for whatever reasons of their own.