• 2 Posts
  • 94 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 5th, 2024

help-circle

  • State it clearly. None of your post have any flair and I checked on two separate clients.

    Telling you that people won’t engage with lazy slop posting isn’t “policing” you, it’s telling you the reality of a situation you’re trying to lie to yourself is censorship. No one owes you engagement or a platform. Spellcheckers are entirely different to LLM. Only a slop poster would confuse or try to deliberately conflate the two.

    Sure do so, myself and a good portion of communities who view this level of use/laziness similarly will keep doing what’s been happening to that content thus far. Just don’t come whinging about it or trying to kid yourself it’s “censorship” when you get banned.


  • You post AI coded stuff asking people to test it to see if it’s “worth investing time in”, you don’t even type the text for those post. It’s not even a witch hunt, it’s blatantly obvious. No one wants to engage with someone who doesn’t appear to bother even typing out their own post. Why should people, put in any effort to engage with you or “your” content if you can’t even be bothered yourself?

    You continually get negative feedback for this and then whinge that it’s “worse than reddit” because plenty on communities here don’t want it descending into chat agents talking to chat agents and try to frame it as “”censorship””. Grow up. You want meaningful engagement on your projects/posts, put in meaningful effort. If you can’t post text without running it through an LLM first you likely haven’t got anything meaningful to contribute anyway.



  • This is not a group that makes public statements often. they only do it as last resort.

    Which has nothing to do with my statement. Commenting before now means they would have commented the same amount, but sooner. Even if it’s still well after it’s obvious to the general public.

    And I’m not speculating this has been common practice for the intelligence community for literally 100 years now.

    Unless you are a part of the US intelligence apparatus, your remarks on why they’ve not commented before now literally cannot be anything but speculation.

    thank fucking god you’d all fail lol

    Incredible. Turning criticism of annoyingly condescending and round-about style of question-talking into a scenario where in fact, you are the teacher, failing everyone else.


  • You mean apart from to avoid seeming incompetent and lacking influence retroactively like with Hormuz? Hardly superficial when they could have made that stance apparent at any point before now to meet that very same objective. Also, not sure why you wouldn’t have opened with this speculation rather than lead with round about questions, that only seemingly make sense after you pose this hypothesis. Your assumptions have much more faith in the US administration than most may still have.

    Also, this isn’t a classroom and you’re not a teacher. Just open with your speculation next time and drop the question-talking, “look people” nonsense.





  • Jenkinson appealed against the decision in Queensland’s civil and administrative tribunal, claiming he was non-violent and “entitled to his political beliefs”.

    Nope. You apply for a gun license and the states grants it to you only when you pass the required checks, including stating you are sound of mind (and don’t have any significant mental illness) and don’t have a criminal conviction. If you can’t show the state this, the state decides you are not capable of owning a gun or it’s not appropriate for you to own a gun; they don’t grant you a license. This isn’t America (thank fuck).

    We had some property owner (we require access to private property occasionally which is notified and organised appropriately) threaten to shoot one of our staff. He was surprised when police turned up and seized his firearms. He then had the audacity to call us up bitching asking us to tell the police to give his guns back. You have to state specific reason(s) for why you should have a firearm on your application, of which there is only a few valid criteria. Surprisingly, shooting people is not one of them.








  • Retired schoolteacher Sandra Barker has been single and a renter all her adult life.

    The 70-year-old lives by herself in a two-bedroom unit in Sydney’s south-west.

    She says she’d like to rent in a “better” suburb but doesn’t believe she’d be able to afford it

    “I think it’s a bit misleading, actually, to think that every baby boomer is cashed up for retirement; I’m certainly not,” Sandra told Insight.

    Boomer who not only refuses to downsize despite being retired and on a pension, is actively looking to increase her current expenses, while occupying a two bedroom by herself, in what has to be one of the most expensive cities to rent in, insists “not all boomers”. I’m actively employed and would have a hard time justifying (and in Sydney affording) living in a two bedroom by myself.

    What’s her angle here? “Sure I’m part of the generation that got cheap as chips houses, free tertiary education, reasonable employment prospects and hoarded a good chunk of the real estate, but I feel I personally missed out, likely due to my financial decisions. So it’s a bit misleading, actually”. This entire article is mind boggling bordering on infuriating to read.




  • As far as I’m aware, no, unless stated otherwise in the store. Their value respective to AUD is meaningless. Because then they have to go exchange it to a useable currency, which may incur unknown fees (and is more work, they’d have to pay for). The currency could also be counterfeit, which most cashiers would suspect if someone tried to offer them foreign currency claiming it’s worth multiple times the transaction amount. If you bring foreign currency over a certain amount into the country you must declare it is the only thing I can think of.