Meta along with Ray-Ban announced new smart glasses and the YT reviewers are praising it.

For me, I don’t find them particularly good and being a Meta product, it will be horrible for privacy. Also people can record others without their knowledge with these, hell no!

  • I’ll be the outlier and say that given the perfect circumstances, I would buy Smart Glasses. BUT in no way, shape, or form would I buy META Smart Glasses.

    I work a retail job where I’m staring at shelves for like 80% of my shift, it would be dope as hell to have smart glasses and have a video playing in my vision while I’m working.

    But until there are more of an “open source” type Smart Glasses that aren’t supported by one of the big companies like Meta or Apple, I’ll join the rest of y’all on staying far away from them.

  • I wear glasses as anyways and I’d love a heads up display. Augmented reality where I could basically spawn full sized displays anywhere for work would be nice too. I’d probably need a device to control it somehow too.

    However, I wouldn’t want them from Google, Apple, Meta or any of the other large corporations. Not coupled with their walled gardens, their subscriptions, their EULAs and terms and conditions and “updates” I didn’t ask for.

    I just want the hardware and a driver for Linux. Connect the glasses via WiFi to my own computer and run the applications on this computer. If I want to use the glasses outside of my home, I would set up a VPN and use my phone to create a WiFi hotspot.

    However, I’m pretty sure nobody is going to build it like that, so I’ll never have smart glasses. Which is fine.

  • Just in a dream scenario where they are

    • Seamless, Not bulky
    • GrapheneOS version for it
    • Physical kill switch for mic, camera and sensors
    • Tor routed, or VPN friendly
    • Only open source software
    • Environmental and Fair wages commitment
    • 100% Repairable and pro-consumer ownership
    • Up to date law for these technologies

    I feel like a phoneless future is quite interesting, even though we will face new issues like not knowing if a person is paying attention to you or not.

  • Salamander ( Sal@mander.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The use-cases that I see advertised are not things that I do in my day-to-day. I usually place my phone on a drawer or leave it in my backpack - I definitely don’t want it on my face.

    So, to me, smart glasses feel like an uncomfortable gimmick at this point. Maybe there is something amazing about them that has not yet clicked with me, but for the time being I don’t see me buying one of these for the foreseeable future.

  • Is it a HUD or just a spy tool?

    I gotta wear glasses anyways so it’d be cool if I can get like a pathing over lay with maps and maybe customizable notifications.

    But video calling and just taking poorly framed pictures isn’t interesting.

  • Carrot ( Carrot@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love the idea of smart glasses, and would happily buy them. However, it’d 1. Need to have 3rd party app support and 2. Be able to work without connecting to any tech company’s servers. I’ve gotten used to my android phone that doesn’t have google play services, and I’ll never go back to having a device that phones home without my permission. In a perfect world I’d like to have some FOSS firmware and OS to run on them, but I’d be willing to go without as long as I could disable traffic to all major tech company servers.

    Unfortunately these requirements will likely mean I won’t be getting smart glasses any time soon

    • lonesomeCat ( lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kinda feel like big tech regrets that we got away with PCs running all foss software. The existence of GNU/Linux saved us in a way, I think some still try to lock us behind Windows I guess but Linux options are not going anywhere and they keep growing stronger I believe. However when it came to smartphones they tried so hard to keep them locked and far from what a natural computer would offer (running anything as long as your CPU architecture supports it). While Android phones got some freedom in the past I believe they’re getting more closed and harder to tweak. Also I was there when iOS jailbreak peaked with all the crazy stuff (it was still hard to switch OS though). Fast forward to smart watches, now these are far more locked than phones and very limited in terms of freedom (even tho some run standars CPUs architectures). I think no way would big tech allow glasses to have freedom and they would make them close to what watches offer these days, maybe worse. I really believe that we should be able to run whatever the hell we want on hardware as long as it is technically possible.

      Tl; dr: GNU/Linux saved the PC industry, corpos will not let that happen again with another industry.