• Longpork3 ( Longpork3@lemmy.nz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      The issue is back to front even. Go read the ingredients on all of the products proudly procliaming themselves “plant based”, and you’ll find a significant number containing animal products, trying to tap into the vegan market without acatually making vegan products and using weasely terms to justify themselves because they never explicitly said it was “vegan”.

  • hanke ( hanke@feddit.nu ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just create icons for foods as we’ve done for recyclables.

    Milk carton? Paper icon. Detergent bottle? Plastic icon.

    Veggie burger? Vegetarian icon. Vegan burger? Vegan icon.

    Then you can just skip all this naming politics and call it whatever you like. Just require the appropriate icons on the front of the packaging.

    Meat/poultry/fish should be their own icons as well imo.

    I don’t know if there’s any good reason not to do this, but it seems like a good idea to me.

  • A_norny_mousse ( A_norny_mousse@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The numbers show that the problem is not with the packaging but with the supermarket shelves. The proximity of meat and plant-based alternatives leads to confusion; simply banning names would likely have little impact.

    This coincides with a pet peeve of mine: strategical supermarket shelving. When in previous decades there were separate sections for different types of produce, these are now mixed in thematically somehow. So, as an example, before there was refrigerated vegan products in one section, sausage/meat products in another, now there’s a section for “things to put on bread”.
    Before there was an organic section, now organic food is mixed in with “normal” food and you have to look for a label.

    This is no doubt to make customers buy more, but I fail to see how exactly. It just pisses me off. I might spend more time in the shop because of that but not more money.
    I have practiced economical shopping, comparing prices and ingredients, for decades. I am not changing my habits.

    They also want me to bend down more often - but that’s OK.

    Many see this as a sideshow. According to hundreds of open-text responses, many consumers view the name debate as unnecessary or just “symbolic politics.” The majority prefer to see a focus on more urgent societal issues.

    A certain type of voter gets riled up very nicely when you even suggest that eating less meat is an option. Therefore it’s specifically right-wing populist Symbolpolitik.