• DavidDoesLemmy ( DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    Man this is so overblown. If it was moved to the 28th, all these whiners wouldn’t even remember in a year or two. As long as I get a holiday in late January, I don’t care about the date. These people always say the sky will fall if we change anything (gay marriage, banning smoking in bars, etc) then we do it and nothing bad happens.

    • hitmyspot ( hitmyspot@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      While I disagree with down voting, especially en masse or on racist grounds, I am also against public shaming of voting. It’s part of the reason voting is partly hidden.

      Of course, you can only have a discussion with commenters, not lurkers.

    • ryannathans ( ryannathans@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      My opinion is fuck you, your drama and the horse you rode in on.

      Upvotes and downvotes are used to indicate what people should see, and I don’t think people should see your posts.

    • tau ( Tau@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, I only ever see you here to stir up drama and your flood of posts agitating against a day you would never celebrate anyway regardless of the date are no exception. You’re doing it again with this comment, post stuff that’s not attempting to stir up shit if you want upvotes.

    • TheHolm ( TheHolm@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wow, tracing people online. :-) I hate racism, promoting one race over other is racism no mater what. All this jumping around First nation only creates more hate toward them, it is not helping at all. Want to help, help people in disadvantage no matter what race they are. If it will go predominately to aboriginals, fine, it means they need it more.

      • Zagorath ( Zagorath@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I hate racism, promoting one race over other is racism no mater what

        Very true. Why, then, are you not opposed to our national celebratory holiday being moved away from a day seen as a day of mourning by some, because of what it represents for them and their culture?

        • TheHolm ( TheHolm@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          It affects only a very small percentage of the population. For the majority, that date means nothing outside its official meaning. And no matter what day you pick, someone will be offended. Just move on; it does not matter in the grand scale of things. But I would agree that putting it on the day when the federation was formed would make more sense, but January 1st is already used.

  • dumbass ( dumbass@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have an argument that gets those racist idiots to agree to moving the day.

    Wouldn’t it be nicer to have a public holiday when the weather’s nicer instead of it being 40 odd degrees? We should move it to a part of the year where it’s still good to go out but it’s not boiling hot. Perfect getting blind drunk and passing out on the grass in the middle of the day weather.

  • FiniteBanjo ( FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am not Australian and I don’t know the entire history or context, but one thing I can say is that not only can people change but nations can change, too. It’s possible to celebrate what a nation has become without celebrating what they’ve done.

    • lumpenproletariat ( Deceptichum@quokk.au ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      And it’s also possible to change the date to one that does not mark a genocide.

      • The 26th is the date the First Fleet landed in Sydney.
      • Australia became a country on January 1st.
      • The 26th became the official date for ‘Australia Day’ only in 1994.
      • SpicyLizards ( SpicyLizards@reddthat.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Spin a wheel and pick a date. It doesn’t matter when it is, just as long as it’s not yet another ‘fuck you’ to the first nations.

        Such a petty and easy to fix thing, but all the skungebags with flags sticking out of their utes seem to think this has some sort of cultural heritage to them. At least the US southerners have a generational gap between them and the loser flag.

        • Zagorath ( Zagorath@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m with you. 3rd March is a good pick for both what it represents (throwing off the shackles of the British) and for the time of year (early Autumn is basically still summer), and I strongly support the idea of changing it to that date.

          I think I would prefer 3rd September or 9th October, the date the Statute of Westminster was enacted (depending on whether you go by the date it actually passed in 1942, or the date it was retroactively applied to in 1939). They both come at a time of year where there’s a relative lack of public holidays. The 5 month period from late December to early May already have Christmas, Boxing Day, New Year’s, Good Friday, Easter Monday, ANZAC Day, and Labour Day. That’s 7. The entire rest of the year has just 2!

          (Using Queensland dates here, but the trend is similar elsewhere, with a lot of state or local public holidays also being in that span. And, obviously, I’m discounting Australia Day from the 5-month period for the sake of the hypothetical. Otherwise it would be 8.)

          Ideal would be an early November/late October holiday, to get that warm weather while still being reasonably removed from the Christmas–Labour Day period. The early October of the date the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act received royal assent is a little earlier than ideal, but has the added bonus of some synergy with ACT, NSW, and SA’s Labour Day, as well as Qld’s King’s Birthday, giving two long weekends in a row: sometimes (including this year) a 3-day week, usually two 4-day weeks in a row.

          But any of these dates would make great alternatives and have my strong support.

    • eureka ( eureka@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s possible to celebrate what a nation has become without celebrating what they’ve done.

      A nation’s actions are a direct result of what the nation is. And many of the shameful actions of Australia are ongoing.

      I love this land, I love many, many people here, and I love many of the things we’ve created together. But I have no desire to celebrate this nation as it stands. I feel no more kinship with someone on the other side of the country to someone on the other side of the world - we are all fellow humans. I treat visitors and immigrants with the same respect I give local citizens. For the many positive parts of Australian culture, I spot as many negatives.

      But even all that aside, if you want to celebrate the positive parts and ignore the negative… it’s embarrassing to plaster the United Kingdom flag everywhere. Green and gold > red, white and blue.

        • Strayce ( Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh yes of course, you were just saying some words. You freely admit not knowing the context but it didn’t occur to you to, idk, educate yourself first? Nah, more important to just say words because idk, freezed peaches or something.

          This is why no one likes Seppos.

            • Strayce ( Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              Hmm yes very smart. Add a useless platitude to a thread you have no idea about or stake in. No background reading or nuance here, just thought terminating cliches! I wonder why nobody is praising your amazing intellect.

                • blind3rdeye ( blind3rdeye@aussie.zone ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Dude, you must understand that many things in life are subtle and depend heavily on context and history. There are many words, gestures, dates, etc. that has special meaning to certain groups of people. The meanings are not intrinsic - they could be changed or forgotten or whatever - but they are also quite real, and often powerful and important.

                  Your original statement was a bit of a nothingburger. Yeah, people / countries can change. whoop-di-do. Nothing wrong with saying it. Maybe some people will appreciate your thoughts on that. But it probably is not going to add much to a discussion that has everything to do with cultural context.

                  On the other hand, in your continued followups you are somehow trying to defend the ‘wisdom’ of your original post. These follow ups are kind of insulting. You apparently know nothing at all about this topic, and yet for some reason you are insisting that your views are relevant. Why are you doing that? I suggest that you let your idea stand on its own merit without you fighting a battle to try to defend it. We don’t need this conflict.

  • Unlucky, I’ve had a nice celebration of our country today.

    Australia was conquered by the British a long time ago. Nothing will ever change that, and the country is what it is today because of that event. No one alive today did the conquering and murdering. Everyone alive today is benefitting from it though, via not still living in caves and huts, having running water and electricity, living past the age of 30, etc.

    • lumpenproletariat ( Deceptichum@quokk.au ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      No one is blaming the people alive, but Australia Day only became officially the 26th in 1994.

      It is within many of our lifetimes and we can change the date to celebrate it on a day that doesn’t coincide with the worst tragedy in our nations history.

      Also your racism is noted.

    • observes_depths ( observes_depths@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are you aware that indigenous Australians had possibly the highest standard of living in the world at the time? All the food, resources and medicines they could need, and all round very healthy. That was all destroyed when they were moved from their land, children stolen, even massacred, so the knowledge no longer exists. Today being born indigenous means a huge disadvantage because of the ongoing impacts. Does that seem right to you? Would you still say they’re benefiting from being occupied?

      • You’re joking, right? They didn’t live to 40 years old lol.

        They were basically caveman equivalent in terms of advancement. They wouldn’t have 99.9% of what they have now if not for the British. Would they have even invented the wheel yet? Probably not, since they hadn’t in 60,000 years…….

        Not a single person alive today would want to go back to living how the aboriginals did. If they did, they could just go and do it in the outback - nothings stopping them. They could go and have their average life expectancy of 30-35 years old, forage and hunt, and so on. Why don’t they?

        • observes_depths ( observes_depths@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Why don’t they return to traditional living? Because the knowledge is gone and the land has been colonised. I’m not saying it was an easy life but the life expectancy was actually much better before colonisation, much better than 40 and certainly better than Europe’s poor at the time.

          You also can’t judge a culture for not inventing the wheel. It’s like saying Europeans are inferior because they hadn’t invented the boomerang or water tree. Europeans didn’t need those things just as Aboriginals didn’t need to build roads and haul cargo up and down them every day.