Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
okwithmydecay ( okwithmydecay@leminal.space )  to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 9 months ago

UK proposes forcing Google to let publishers opt out of AI summaries

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
5
link
fedilink
44
external-link

UK proposes forcing Google to let publishers opt out of AI summaries

apnews.com

okwithmydecay ( okwithmydecay@leminal.space )  to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 9 months ago
message-square
5
link
fedilink
Britain's competition watchdog says Google should let news sites and content creators opt out of having their content scraped for AI overviews.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • CerebralHawks ( cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Nice, but we should ALL (UK and beyond) be able to opt out of AI manipulation. Of course, the ideal would be, we’d have to opt in in the first place. And those below the age of majority cannot consent, so that would solve that problem.

  • Hirom ( Hirom@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    It should be opt-in.

  • Flamekebab ( Flamekebab@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Could we have the same for YouTube videos? I don’t want your stupid summaries.

    • napoleonsdumbcousin ( napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Until they get forced to implement an off-switch, you can block them with uBlock Origin in the meantime.

  • Riskable ( riskable@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wrong way to handle AI summaries: Google crawls the article and presents it’s summary.

    Right way to handle AI summaries: Your own browser uses a local AI model on your PC to generate the summary.

    The first is easy to stop with legislation, the second is impossible to stop and yet, if you try you’re a fucking asshole trying to tell people what they can and cannot do with their own hardware. That’s straight up villain behavior.

United Kingdom@feddit.uk

unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 144 users / day
  • 872 users / week
  • 1.52K users / month
  • 3.57K users / 6 months
  • 90 local subscribers
  • 7.04K subscribers
  • 4.62K Posts
  • 16.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • tom ( tom@feddit.uk ) 
  • GreatAlbatross ( GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk ) 
  • frankPodmore ( frankPodmore@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code