• Lumidaub ( Lumidaub@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      Law enforcement is (should be) held to higher standards in determining motive. They need to show evidence, not simply go on what’s likely. As long as there is no direct link between the proposal and the attack, it’s circumstantial and “unclear”, even if common sense says “well duh”.

      • fonix232 ( fonix232@fedia.io ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        This.

        And it’s not just law enforcement, but also the media - basically anyone who has any semblance of authority therefore their words have more power than your average person.

        Let’s play the hypothesis game. Let’s presume that the referee wasn’t attacked because he was gay while in public, but rather, someone he had beef with (even unknowingly) saw him on TV, followed him and beat him up. Then once he’s caught he could sue the police and the media who published that he beat the referee because he was gay, which would be slander…

        I know for many it’s weird that criminals get to have rights, but over the past ~250 years we’ve refined a system that mostly works AND helps the police apprehend criminals at a much higher rate. Sorry fellas but your need to know comes last, the priority is on catching the person or people who did this and serving justice.

  • Goldholz  ( Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Motivation Unclear” YEAH HMMM I WONDER WHY THE GAY GUY GOT ATTACKED AFTER HE DID GAY STUFF!?

    And watch it german media nore the government will say ANYTHING about it. Maybe the media in a side sentence. But besides that NOTHING!

    “Hitler attacked poland, build concentration camps and goes strongly agenst jews. His motivation is unclear”