• Undvik ( Undvik@fedia.io ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      You build breeder reactors or use any of the non-uranium designs that were ignored by countries because they didn’t have weapons grade byproducts.

      There are ways to deal with the waste, the problem is always politics/greed as it cuts into the profits. Same is true for other energy sources btw, with coal we happily shoot the waste into the atmosphere and pretend nothing’s wrong with that.

      • GarbadgeGoober ( GarbadgeGoober@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah 100% agree with you.

        Unfortunately it is always the issue with greed and maximise the profits.

        But that’s why I don’t really believe in the usefulness of Nuclear as a energy source. The idea behind it is brilliant, but the way we use it is not. I am no expert in this field, just my personal opinion.

    • 87Six ( 87Six@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Isn’t it basically a non-issue?

      Afaik so little of it is generated that we can comfortably store it for thousands of years.

      It can also be used in manufacturing later, like in making depleted uranium APFSDS penetrators (for your mom - sorry)

      Also, I believe it’s literally harmless, isn’t it? If properly sealed of course. Afaik it just produces heat for a very, very long time…

      • GarbadgeGoober ( GarbadgeGoober@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Might be, but I personally don’t feel comfortable it being stored. What if it leaks. Not my problem, as I will be dead by then, but still we will leave it for future generations.

        I have seen the chaos building the Hinkley reactor and the costs, so my personal opinion there are cheaper ways of producing energy.