Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to TechnologyEnglish · 6 months ago

Mozilla introduces cq: 'Stack Overflow for agents'

www.theregister.com

external-link
message-square
26
link
fedilink
36
external-link

Mozilla introduces cq: 'Stack Overflow for agents'

www.theregister.com

sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al )  to TechnologyEnglish · 6 months ago
message-square
26
link
fedilink
: A knowledge database where AI agents read, add and score the items – what could go wrong?
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • BlackEco ( BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    For fuck’s sake, Mozilla, have you learned nothing? We do not care about AI products

    • Malgas ( Malgas@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not true. I care very deeply about avoiding them.

    • vermaterc ( vermaterc@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe you don’t care, but to be a sustainable company, Mozilla need to look for alternative sources of income. They can’t just make 2010s style browser forever.

      • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        How do you expect them to make money off of this? The only thing they’ve done is burned money by developing it.

        • Mark with a Z ( markz@suppo.fi ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          That describes almost everything they’ve done.

          • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Apparently Firefox is actually profitable!

            It’s the only part of Mozilla that is.

            But that didn’t stop them from laying off employees (and eventually laying off the department head fighting against those layoffs) regardless.

          • org ( org@lemmy.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Seeing as they are a non-profit, they should be spending it all. Although I think AI isn’t the right direction.

            • Mark with a Z ( markz@suppo.fi ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              Nonprofit or not, burning money on countless bad projects isn’t good.

        • vermaterc ( vermaterc@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Are you seriously asking how to make money out of large, structured knowledge base in 2026? Having data these days is like having a goldmine, I can’t think of any more valuable asset.

          • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yes. Of course. Claims require evidence.

            Specifically for the AI initiative in this article, or any of their broader AI initiatives, which have been worryingly many.

      • dfyx ( dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        They‘re not supposed to make money. They are a non-profit foundation that takes donations to develop an open source project and I expect them to spend those donations on exactly that project and not much else.

      • orca ( orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        AI companies haven’t even turned a profit on it, so idk how Mozilla will.

        • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Exactly. If AI companies can’t even profit while fighting dirty, what makes Mozilla think that they can do it ethically?!

      • BlackEco ( BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, I agree with you, but why chase the latest hype that’s probably going to burst soon?

        • vermaterc ( vermaterc@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          that’s probably going to burst soon

          what do you mean “burst”? Stock market valuation of IT companies are currently overblown, yes, but the technology is not going anywhere. I’m personally using it for software development, it became part of my workflow and I don’t intend to stop using it. I also see other people chatting with bots daily. It just become a new kind of user interface to which people got used to.

          • maegul (he/they) ( maegul@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Many, myself included, may not like to hear this, but I think it’s the bitter truth.

            For better or worse, the majority like this technology. AI companies have stuck the landing in a sales sense.

            For those who find it cringey or offensive or whatever, we may have to get used to being black sheep (even more).

            • P03 Locke ( p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Removed by mod

              • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Please remember to be(e) nice when using Beehaw.

              • maegul (he/they) ( maegul@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Ha, ok. Well I think your response is rude, meaningless, petulant, and a waste of space.

                But I’m really glad we have people like you on social media to remind us what it’s all about.

                • P03 Locke ( p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I was trying to get you to understand a POV by reminding you how things were 25 years ago, but clearly that idea was lost on you.

          • XLE ( XLE@piefed.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            “AI is inevitable” is a thought-terminating cliché, and you’ve spent enough time in AI advocacy groups on Lemmy to know that by now. Instead of making claims, please show your work.

        • P03 Locke ( p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          why chase the latest hype that’s probably going to burst soon?

          Back in the 2000s, there was an Internet bubble, and it burst. That did not make the Internet go away.

          What makes you think LLMs are going to suddenly disappear?

    • Buelldozer ( Buelldozer@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      You may not but many others DO.

  • Kairos ( LodeMike@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Mozilla doing everything except making their browser better

    • sabreW4K3 ( sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not even remotely true.

    • limerod ( limerod@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the foundation. You are probably thinking about the corporation.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 212 users / day
  • 1.27K users / week
  • 2.24K users / month
  • 5.29K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.6K subscribers
  • 6.38K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code