That was not my intention, instead I tried to repeat your idea in my own words to make sure I actually understand. Also I intentionally added kinda opposing factions and the concept “freedom of movement” to my question to make the idea more clear to me and others.
Also your idea reminds a little of the “World where many worlds fit” idea that comes from (or I have first learned of when reading) zapatista texts.
Removed by mod
Because a large part of many of these practices is the exclusion of all others. Thanks for sharing, though!
Removed by mod
They do not want to coexist. The existence of an ‘other’ is a threat/attack to them.
Read nazi philosopher carl schmitt or fiction novel ‘blindsight’.
Removed by mod
Noted elsewhere. Differences will happen. Why make them discrete or sacred?
Removed by mod
I expect the same way you continue as is without any prison or bloodshed.
Removed by mod
That was not my intention, instead I tried to repeat your idea in my own words to make sure I actually understand. Also I intentionally added kinda opposing factions and the concept “freedom of movement” to my question to make the idea more clear to me and others.
Also your idea reminds a little of the “World where many worlds fit” idea that comes from (or I have first learned of when reading) zapatista texts.
Removed by mod