• boonhet ( boonhet@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t live in the US so mostly I’m thinking of who’s gonna pay for my retirement and healthcare when I’m old.

      I’m paying for the current old people’s retirement and healthcare. That’s fine, it’s the social contract we have in our nation: everyone gets taken care of and those who can work, pay a lot of tax to make it happen. If the population decline gets bad enough, there will be no one to do the same for my generation.

      Oh and they populist conservatives did a pension reform so you can take out whatever you’ve gathered in your second pillar even at age 20 if you want (at which point it’ll probably be in the hundreds of euros lol) and can’t resume payments (which were matched by the government - you pay 2, 4 or 6 percent and government pays 4% of your gross income) for 10 years. Worst deal ever for most people taking it out if they want to retire at one point. And a third of the population took it out. They now have to fully depend on the first pillar (government) pension, which isn’t based on past investments at all, it’s taken from the working population’s social taxes when you retire. So far more directly affected by the population decline. I’m betting they’ll eventually forcibly fuck it up for the rest of us to pay for the retirements of those who took it out.

        • The “resources” we rely on require (working) humans, less working humans means less resources. The population we have today won’t disappear all at once but when they age out of the workforce, a smaller population will not be able to support them

          In other words, if we are below replacement level, we will eventually have a situation where the old outnumber the young, which means that the young have to work harder to support the old

          • resipsaloquitur ( resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The biggest concern right now is the looming massive unemployment crisis and you’re worried about too much demand for work?

            And how does fewer working people decrease resources? Fewer working peole means less land? Less water? Less energy?

            • boonhet ( boonhet@sopuli.xyz ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              The biggest concern right now is the looming massive unemployment crisis and you’re worried about too much demand for work?

              It’s a two sided issue. We’re laying off a bunch of people in jobs that require thinking, but not doing stuff in the physical world. But jobs that require doing physical things are still much more difficult to automate if it requires any sort of flexibility to conditions. We’ll still need people in a bunch of roles, they’ll just be jobs people won’t want to do as much, because it’ll be dirtier and harder work. And of course in our present economic system at present time, these jobs aren’t very highly paid since we don’t have a real shortage of workers yet.

              And how does fewer working people decrease resources? Fewer working peole means less land? Less water? Less energy?

              Land on its own doesn’t produce much useful, you still need people to work it. Power plants need employees too. Etc. There are still so, so many things we can’t accomplish without humans physically present and moving objects. Automation makes things more efficient, but we still need humans.

              If the population of the world shrunk evenly in all ages, it wouldn’t be an issue. It’s only an issue because the population is aging.

              And yes, in the future we’ll probably have AI doctors, AI teachers and AI engineers to provide us mediocre healthcare, education and help invent stuff. But we won’t have AI electricians or AI plumbers anytime soon. Much harder problems to automate.

        • boonhet ( boonhet@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It does tend to happen that we’re pretty prejudiced, yes. Personally I’m not and most people I know aren’t either, but anyone who grew up in the soviet era is generally pretty racist towards people of color. It’ll take a few more decades for things to get better I’m afraid.

  • FiniteBanjo ( FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    I make it my personal responsibility in life to constantly bring up the necessity of immigration as the solution to age disparity and population decline. There are working people. There are as many as you could ever need, tens of millions, perhaps hundreds. It’s never going to be an issue which can’t be solved with immigration.

  • There are 8.3 Billion people on the planet and there were 7.5 ten years ago. We have enough people. We have enough resources for everyone to live comfortably and be well in their communities. We have more than enough money and other valuable things to trade.

    The main thing getting in our way isn’t a low birth rate.

    Anyone genuinely concerned with the depopulation of humans in 2026 is probably some flavour of breeder cult weirdo, and the only ones constantly banging on about it in politics, academia, the news, etc are imperialists, industrialists and racist patriarchs. IME.

    • Phoenixz ( phoenixz@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree with you that there are too many people on this world, and yes, we can do with way less.

      Having said that

      A little bit lower that the 2.1 birthrate is fine, A very low birth rate is very bad for everyone. Sudden changed on demographics will fuck your country up and can make it disappear in a hundred years without you realizing it until it’s too late

      Demographics is like a slow moving cargo train, you only hear some humming and then some blaring and then when it hits you it won’t stop or even slow down for a second

      Countries like South Korea are at risk for their very existence and really should act now to avoid the day that North Korea can just walk in because they won’t have enough people left to even take care of themselves

      China has a similar problem and it’s bad. They have a huge amount of people becoming old and unable to add to the economy anymore and requiring more and more help from others… That means that more money will go out to the old, and there is less money for the young to get kids and add to the next generation. This is in part why there are so few kids these days, it’s simply too expensive to have any.

      Lowering your population slowly and carefully is fine. Having your population drop off a cliff like it’s happening in many counties world wide is a disaster

  • fizzle ( fizzle@quokk.au ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hate to break it to you YuckyTom but no matter how you slice it a declining birth rate means a shittier situation for you in your retirement. Most people who think about anything other than retweets and boobs care about this.