• warm ( warm@kbin.earth ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, dont get me wrong, its nice to see another device in the inside-out space (to avoid fucking Meta), but I think its going to be too expensive to compete with Meta on the main stage.

          But I would also have liked to see a takeover of the high end again, to see Valve push the limits.

          • balgruuf ( balgruuf@nord.pub ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            I hope you’re underestimating the number of people who want vr but refuse to buy a quest because of meta.

            I guess valve will decide what comes next when they have an idea for how the frame does. At least the hype makes it sound like it could sell well.

              • 123 ( 123@programming.dev ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                A lot of us are tired of high end BS no one can afford and highly proprietary stuff. Hollow Knight is the best game I’ve played in a long, long time and it could have been played with my 10+ year old midrange computer vs the updated one which was quieter for sure but didn’t feel like much of an upgrade given how unoptimized AAA games are now.

                Perhaps this is a blessing in disguise and we might see some actual game engine optimizations that don’t expect hardware to keep getting better to perform. Plenty of games that were previously seen as a no go are now targeting the steam deck, which makes them more playable overall in every system.

                Edit: my point: more sales = more interest = better optimization = better graphics at a lower entry point.

        • warm ( warm@kbin.earth ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yea, its a good alternative, albeit more expensive, to Meta’s Quest devices. I’ll pick one up, but I do want to see Valve target the high-end again and push the VR space like they did with the Index.

    • Cethin ( Cethin@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m willing to bet it isn’t an Index upgrade. That was an absolute top end VR HMD with no compromises. If you’re able to run it, with the space for it, then this isn’t going to top it. The resolution is lower, and the tracking is internal (which seems to be fine, but not as good if you can do lighthouses instead).

      The only parts that are upgrades, I think, is being able to do things standalone without a connection to a computer, and being wireless (pros and cons).

        • Cethin ( Cethin@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I thought the Index was higher than that.

          I had an original Vive though. I’ve used an Index, and it looks mostly totally fine in comparison. It definitely doesn’t suck, but higher is almost always better. Notably though, the Frame will not be pushing this resolution everywhere. It’ll only be where you’re looking, but that’s pretty much fine, if not ideal. Using extra energy and creating more heat to render detail we can’t perceive isn’t good, especially for something mounted to your face.

  • picnic ( picnic@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think I’m gonna buy this second hand this time.

    I’ve always bought valve HW new and even preordered most of them, but in the current financial climate, I think I’m gonna wait a bit.

    I do have a wifi7 access point already wired with this in mind, though.