Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
David Gerard ( dgerard@awful.systems ) M to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 3 months ago

Meta’s new AI creep glasses will record 24-7 without a light

pivot-to-ai.com

external-link
message-square
26
link
fedilink
170
external-link

Meta’s new AI creep glasses will record 24-7 without a light

pivot-to-ai.com

David Gerard ( dgerard@awful.systems ) M to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 3 months ago
message-square
26
link
fedilink
Meta’s AI glasses have all sorts of alleged use cases. The real use case is the market of creeps and weirdos who film people out and about without their consent. And Meta knows for a fact this is t…

the continuing legacy of FaceMash

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8YxiCqUz98&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20260709-metas-new-ai-creep-glasses-to-record-24-7-without-a-light - podcast

time: 5 min 05 sec

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • wirebeads ( wirebeads@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    Zuckerfuck is absolute cancer, but the even sadder part is how many losers buy this shit. Shame.

  • HM King Charles III DG FD ( Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    We had to ban these at my workplace.

    They were already prohibited due to our existing mobile policies, but we had to especially ban them whenever someone brought them in.

    • WhoIzDisIz ( WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Did you already know they were creepy, or did they out themselves?

      • o7___o7 ( o7___o7@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I imagine Andrew brought them on day 1

      • HM King Charles III DG FD ( Flax_vert@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Someone found the glasses charging. I don’t know the individual, I can’t even remember their name, and I’ve never interacted with them. As far as I am aware, it’s a simple manner of not allowing someone to have a camera strapped to their head when working.

        I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt, they were a foreign national who claimed they needed to use them for translation purposes. However, such an excuse can in theory be used by someone trying to commit espionage, so we cannot tolerate it. It was just recommended to their department to provide translated materials to help them grasp work-related terminology.

  • Zephorah ( Zephorah@discuss.online ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    Zuckerberg is creepy so this follows. We are talking about a guy who would walk around his startup office with a samurai sword pretending to chop his employees with it. And a guy who deliberately got Julius Caesar’s haircut. And a guy whose original version of Facebook was a platform on which college students could rate the attractiveness of female college students.

  • ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace ( ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t condone violence but,…

    Actually, no, I do condone violence against these pricks. Zuck, Bezos, Musk & Co. deserve to be hung by an angry mob.

  • LostWanderer ( LostWanderer@fedia.io ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ugh, this company is totally fucking creepy! If only there were a way to disrupt these glasses using readily available electronics…

    • WhoIzDisIz ( WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s an Android app that will constantly scan for their Bluetooth signature in the background and alert you.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 ( 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have this app. I work with a douche who wears these (despite then being banned), and this app didn’t pick them up.

        • Beehaw_Girl ( Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          The app didn’t detect the glasses that it was solely designed to detect??

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 ( 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not in my case, no.

      • PenguinCoder ( Penguincoder@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        That must be a huge battery killer.

        • shnizmuffin ( shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Nah, if you have Bluetooth on your phone is already doing it.

          • Septimaeus ( Septimaeus@infosec.pub ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Basically this. The polling rate and client interrogation behavior can often be pushed to a far more aggressive stance than the usual defaults, but only in foreground mode on most mobile OSes.

        • WhoIzDisIz ( WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have it installed on mine & haven’t noticed any difference.

  • BlueMonday1984 ( BlueMonday1984@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh, boy, Rapist Glasses

    There’s a UK Parliament petition to “Introduce an immediate ban on the sale and promotion of smart glasses”. If you’re in the UK, you might want to sign it. [UK Parliament]

    Given Parliament’s track record, they’ll probably respond by banning glasses that don’t have cameras, but I still endorse this

    • chrisgerhard ( chrisgerhard@mastodon.green ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      @BlueMonday1984 @dgerard don’t be silly, they will ban children from having glasses.

      • scruiser ( scruiser@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Isn’t UK’s usually problem the other way around, they use "Protecting the Children"tm as an excuse to ban sensible things or take away privacy from adults? This would be a first, taking away something from Children to protect the adults.

    • Karl Habermas ( habermas@mstdn.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • Strypey ( strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      @BlueMonday1984
      > petition to “Introduce an immediate ban on the sale and promotion of smart glasses"

      This seems like kind of a knee jerk response. How are “smart” glasses defined? Could such a ban also limit privacy-respecting digital facewear? When covering protests for Indymedia, I would have loved a wearable camera.

      If the only thing that makes these different from carrying a “smart” phone is the always-on camera, maybe it would be better to propose regulation specific to that?

      @dgerard

  • Jo Miran ( JoMiran@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    No fucking way they have enough battery built into that frame.

    • WhoIzDisIz ( WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Would it be that hard to run a hidden wire to a battery bank? Especially with longer hair?

      • Beehaw_Girl ( Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Waiting for Zuck to grow dreadlocks to store nests of batteries.

  • arcine ( arcine@jlai.lu ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t get why these things even need cameras ?

    • gh0stcassette ( gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      For mass data collection obviously

  • Noortje Van Leeuwen ( Noortjevee@mstdn.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    @dgerard so…these camera’s are recording without a notification light?

    Thats…that has to be illegal…

TechTakes@awful.systems

techtakes@awful.systems

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !techtakes@awful.systems

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 50 users / day
  • 333 users / week
  • 890 users / month
  • 1.65K users / 6 months
  • 56 local subscribers
  • 2.72K subscribers
  • 1.49K Posts
  • 35.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • David Gerard ( dgerard@awful.systems ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code