Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · 3 months ago

SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a month

www.businessinsider.com

external-link
message-square
49
link
fedilink
236
external-link

SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a month

www.businessinsider.com

Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · 3 months ago
message-square
49
link
fedilink
SpaceX's market cap has lost about $1 trillion in value since its June 16 peak and hit a new low since its record-breaking IPO.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Che Banana ( The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    3 months ago

    Biggest pump and dump scheme yet… Now come the gov bailout to keep the company afloat while dismantling NASA further

    • 777 ( 777@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was looking at this a while back, and I don’t think insiders can sell for a while yet, but I think this really has been a gift to short sellers.

      In the end, I didn’t end up buying into the IPO because it seemed overpriced, and while I do like the idea of some of the business (Starlink) I don’t understand why it’s got to come with a fucking social network of all things.

  • schmorp ( schmorpel@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t think we should accept those people’s money anymore - what are these billions, trillions, gazillions, schmoozillions even supposed to be. I’m happy to trade in sea shells or your kiddo’s drawings with you instead if you have an honest face!

    • xylol ( xylol@leminal.space ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      New racism based trade economy?

      • Nicadimos ( Nicadimos@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        New?

        • No_Eponym ( No_Eponym@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          New new! Its newer than the old new!

          • TranquilTurbulence ( TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s like one of those filenames: final_final_draft_new_new_final_final_review_final_new_report.odt

            • Powderhorn ( Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              _2

              • TranquilTurbulence ( TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                😄 exactly. Totally forgot about sprinkling in a few numbers.

  • FukOui ( FukOui@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    Correction: Lost a trillion in speculative value. There’s a difference

    • krisevol ( krisevol@lemmus.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      And people want to tax this speculative value.

      • t3rmit3 ( t3rmit3@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Any time you attempt to convert it into a usable asset, including using it as collateral or citing it as an asset for loans or investment capital solicitation, it should be taxed. Once someone accepts its value in exchange for something, it’s no longer speculative.

      • bless ( bless@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you say it’s worth a trillion, then you should put your money where your mouth is

        • krisevol ( krisevol@lemmus.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          But the investors are saying it’s a trillion.

  • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    3 months ago

    its just absolutely crazy to buy shares in a company where special super shares where made to make sure anyone buying shares could never own or control the company.

    • InevitableList ( InevitableList@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not really. I’ve never been to a shareholder meeting and never will. I buy stocks to turn a profit from dividends and appreciation not to get a chance to micromanage the company.

      • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        fair enough but if shareholders don’t control the company then there might be to much of a need for the owners salary for dividends. which is why you don’t buy that crap.

    • Dragging up again ( dragginupagain@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Extremely funny to think that stocks primarily have value and that people buy stocks for the shareholder votes.

      • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Their value is in ownership which includes say in how its run. I mean stocks have been nuts for a while P/E and P/B and D/E and D/A are things of the past.

    • GregorGizeh ( GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is it? That is, if i were to own a public company, the only way i would ever allow anyone else to own a part of it. It is my company, i don’t want fucking shareholders pressure me for more profits and shortsighted decisions. If the vultures want a share of the profits they get just that, not a voice at the table.

      • Kazumara ( Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        i were to own a public company

        It is my company

        No, by definition it is not, if you sell part of it to the public and make it a public company.

        • GregorGizeh ( GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          … If i had a company and it were successful, and i decided to go public, i would only issue that kind of voteless share or whatever they are called, so that i would be protected from shareholder pressure to some extent. Was that not clear somehow? Or did you just want to go for the snark

          • Kazumara ( Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            No I’m just pointing out that your view on who should morally control the company is wrong from the start.

            • GregorGizeh ( GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              How so? Shareholders are the worst cancer on the economy, but at the same time hard to eliminate without a revolution.

              The proper order should be that people invest in a company they believe will do well, not because they seek to exert control over it. If you do not believe the company is operating in a profitable manner you should not buy, or sell your, shares.

              You state this is wrong. Why? In my opinion, if we must have institutionalized gambling, we should seek to keep it from exerting undue influence, even in the shareholders own long term interest. Of course this would not allow the leadership to just do whatever with the money, reporting and oversight should if anything be improved upon.

              • Apathy Tree ( ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                Companies aren’t required to go public in the first place so it’s a rather moot point. They actively choose to be in the situation where they are beholden to shareholders.

                If you owned a company you could just, like, not go asking rich people for money to grow or whatever (what IPO is, basically) and grow naturally on your own merits. Then you don’t even have to worry about what kind of votes people might have.

                Personally I think the stock market should just be banned outright. Go back to pensions or some sort of UBI or even have companies pay into universal pensions or something, whatever, but tying retirement to gambling needs to stop, and the entire gambling on the economy thing is clearly not working well overall what with it being pretty easy to manipulate, to the destruction of all, and all…

              • Kazumara ( Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Non-voting common stock is a scam pulled by these fucking billionaire founders to reduce public participation, and concentrate their power, even as they use other’s money for their pet projects.

                If a company just needs to take up money for an investment, it can issue bonds. Then it gives up no control, but enters into a fair agreement with someone loaning them capital at fixed rates, with no pretense of ownership.

                If they sell shares, that is supposed to represent partial ownership and allow all the owners to collectively decide on strategy. It also brings with it the right to recall board members who go insane, like Musk or Zuckerberg. To prevent that these scumbags issue non-voting stock, or stock that has such reduced voting rights as to be essentially useless. Like SpaceX recently, all the IPO shares (class A) carry a tenth of the voting rights compared to the ones they kept (class B).

      • Pyr ( Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        That is literally the entire point of shares. You buy a percentage of the company and give them money so they can use that money to expand and develop.

        Why would I give a company money if I don’t get a percentage of that company? It’s not a fuckin donation.

        • GregorGizeh ( GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You give that money to the Corp to get profits in return. Not a say in how the company is run, at least youre not supposed to for healthy business operations. One of, if not the biggest reason that for example steam continues to win is just they are being not overtly greedy and shortsighted. That is obviously a much healthier business model.

          • t3rmit3 ( t3rmit3@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Valve isn’t public. That’s the healthy business model.

      • HubertManne ( HubertManne@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes. I realize someone else explained it to you but you as the owner would love to sell it that way but others as a buyer would be nuts to buy your shares. Its not crazy to sell shares that way its crazy to buy them.

      • TehPers ( TehPers@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you’re in a position to dictate what shareholders get, you have no real reason to go public. Just keep it privately owned.

        You go public to raise funds. The least reasonable thing to do to someone is ask them for money with a pinky promise that they might make a profit. Usually, those people are going to want something in return, like a say in how their money is spent.

  • trainsrkool ( trainsrkool@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

  • Hairyfishnuts ( Hairyfishnuts@feddit.online ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • floofloof ( floofloof@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      You mean ordinary Americans will. It’s not like he’ll pay anything.

      • Hairyfishnuts ( Hairyfishnuts@feddit.online ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • lightnsfw ( lightnsfw@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not gonna care about this unless it gets bad enough to get musk to kill himself.

    • Drusas ( Drusas@fedia.io ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      He got what he wanted: going down as the world’s first trillionaire.

  • fonix232 ( fonix232@fedia.io ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ah fuck, I knew I shoulda shorted it…

    • Helix 🧬 ( helix@feddit.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t be sad, I shorted it but didn’t put waaaay enough money into that endeavour to make me rich.

    • DragonTypeWyvern ( DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean this market didn’t just stay irrational for five years past due, it’s still wildly irrational.

  • Helix 🧬 ( helix@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I made 29% within a week shorting SpaceX already, should I hodl or sell my position at some point? Do we think it’ll ever recover?

    • sobchak ( sobchak@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it’s like Tesla stock, it will behave completely irrationally. Though, I guess most of the stock market is irrational now.

      • k_rol ( k_rol@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Now? The whole thing has always been based on human feelings, that’s the point. I think you mean it is more volatile now? Or maybe it changes more radically?

    • apotheotic (she/her) ( apotheotic@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’re talking about a business led by the richest person in the world who has already made it entirely clear he can buy his way to anything he desires. 30% is a tidy sum, I’d lock it in and call it a day.

    • supersquirrel ( supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It will not, not permanently.

  • AlexisFR ( AlexisFR@jlai.lu ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I really liked SpaceX as a rocket company, why did all that AI BS had to be attached to it??

    • Deyis ( Deyis@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because it was the only way for the Nazi Elon Musk to effectively launder money and glaze over his repeated failures in a way which still preserves his wealth.

  • PointyFluff ( PointyFluff@lemmy.ml ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • ɔiƚoxɘup ( Quexotic@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    So how much damage did it do to our retirement funds?

  • belated_frog_pants ( belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ha Ha 👉

  • anachronist ( anachronist@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lockups start expiring next month. They’ve still only floated less than 5% of the company! Buckle up buttercup.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CCzD3ONQsmM

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 101 users / day
  • 825 users / week
  • 2.13K users / month
  • 5.16K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.7K subscribers
  • 6.41K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code