Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
davel [he/him] ( davel@lemmy.ml )  to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months ago

The Work-From-Home Surcharge: Inside the Controversial New Fee Affecting Renters

www.realtor.com

external-link
message-square
21
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • usa@midwest.social
45
external-link

The Work-From-Home Surcharge: Inside the Controversial New Fee Affecting Renters

www.realtor.com

davel [he/him] ( davel@lemmy.ml )  to United States | News & Politics@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
21
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • usa@midwest.social
A rental listing in California has sparked debate among renters—thanks to its $200 monthly fee for tenants who work from home.
  • unmagical ( unmagical@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just charge what the utilities cost. Why you gotta make up some bullshit to tack ontop?

    • UltraGiGaGigantic ( UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why

      They thought of a bigger number and now its your problem.

    • Malyca ( Malyca@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dragon levels of greed

    • Hawk ( Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, the article seems to explain it: they can’t.

      Local policies seem to cap the rent to protect renters, so they make up some bullshit extra fees to bypass those caps.

      • unmagical ( unmagical@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Utilities aren’t rent.

        • Maeve ( Maeve@kbin.earth ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sometimes they’re included, sometimes not, sometimes some are while others are not.

      • DudleyMason ( DudleyMason@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Local policies seem to cap the rent to protect renters, so they make up some bullshit extra fees to bypass those caps.

        And a functional local government wouldn’t allow that kind of sophistry and would treat that exactly like illegal rent increases. But you can’t have both landlords existing and any level of functional government.

United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml

usa@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !usa@lemmy.ml
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 94 users / day
  • 468 users / week
  • 1.29K users / month
  • 2.87K users / 6 months
  • 320 local subscribers
  • 9.49K subscribers
  • 7.54K Posts
  • 15.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • pangyuehung ( pangyuehung@lemmy.ml ) 
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ ( yogthos@lemmy.ml ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code