Wow, all that super stable, super reliable base load energy is just mindblowing!! Let’s build more nuclear power plants!
Let’s build more nuclear power plants!
If we had done that early on we wouldn’t have global warming and there wouldn’t be a cool water shortage.
but that’s not true. Electricity only accounts for about 18% of emissons, its non renewable, you’d have a waste pile the size of a mountain, would have run out of fuel by now and you’d need to start decommissioning most of them and rebuilding them
There’s a persist myth that some technology can just magic a fix here, nothing short of vastly reduced energy consumption, and lifestyle changes can work, 10000 aging nuclear reactors that need replacing ain’t going to cut it.
an example ?
we’d get a 30% reduction in emissions if the richest 10% loved like the average European, not enough but an excellent start
Hi big oil, propaganda still paying off?
Fissile resources would have been depleted a long time ago if everyone would have went with nuclear. Don’t be so daft.
Accounting for breeder reactors your answer is only off by about 4 billion years.
It was a good guess though.
No they wouldn’t, plus the drive to nuclear would have pushed us to thorium and breeder reactors far sooner, using those we could power the Earth for billions of years, they can even use nuclear waste as fuel, don’t be daft and actually educate yourself instead of carrying water for Big Oil.
Electricity only accounts for about 18% of emissons
You have to switch all processes to electricity or hydrogen like steel making or fertilizer.
Best results come from not abusing the third world and letting them have a future that allows them to only have two children.
another 30% if work from home was standard
we’d get a 30% reduction in emissions if the richest 10% loved like the average European, not enough but an excellent start
It would solve a lot, if the rich were normal people capable of love
It’s more relevant what we should/can do now than what we should’ve done years ago, no?
I mean, obviously learn from history and not make the same mistakes, but it’s also not necessarily the case that whatever would’ve been the solution back then, still is today.
If the same people are still in power and don’t show acceptance of their mistakes or a willingness to correct them then it is relevant. There are solutions but it should be clear that they won’t implement them.
“Look at all that renewable green solar generation! Sure doesn’t work so well when it’s buried under a mudslide lol”
That’s what you sound like
The thing is that this is a really desperate measure. The danube is one of Europes biggest rivers. That nuclear power plant was build with water inlets. That plant has been there for ages as every nuclear plant in Europe is old as fuck. That rock has been there also a long time. Having to blast it to help a little bit in order to save the reactor producing so much energy that the other plants in the country can’t take over, is desperate as fuck
Yeah, they’re responding to a (not-so-) natural disaster. Of course infrastructure built half a century ago under wildly different conditions is at risk.
Even if solar panels get buried under a mudslide, you can just build new solar panels very quickly. If that would happen to a nuclear plant, you would need to wait 10+years for a new one.
Yeah, right. Those totally predictable mud slides that happen every summer and are expected to increase in frequency and duration with climate change… 🤣
if you looked at what is going on, you would see that bulk of the missing energy in hungarian grid is supplied from czech and slovak grids, where half or so energy is supplied from nuclear powerplants that don’t have such problems https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/CZ/72h/hourly
not to mention the french, who put bunch of their reactors near shore and won’t ever have problems with cooling, and so export 10-15GW every day
Am I the only moron who thought they meant music?
deleted by creator
I’m a firm believer in nuclear, but I think that’s a garbage argument against renewable since we have batteries, and other means of energy storage like reservoirs. And now China is lifting a building and dropping it for power. The US is introducing batteries that last 24 hours for data center use.
Honestly, the energy storage sector is interesting to watch right now. There are seemingly endlessly researched designs for energy storage that have never made it to market. But now all of a sudden when data centers are realizing there’s not enough power on the grid, now they’re hitting market. To an extent, I get supply and demand. But the energy storage infrastructure hitting the market now isn’t from recent ground breaking innovations. This shit could have been implemented years ago.
deleted by creator
Energy storage =/= batteries
I’m American, I dont know shit about geography, but I think Germany is central to northern Europe.
Germany’s peak solar time is the summer, and their peak wind time is winter. Fascinating. Do you think the people in charge of the grid know this? Maybe this could be leveraged to reduce the energy storage needs for solar power during the winter???
As someone who closely follows the energy storage market, you should know that lithium-ion battery production capacity is expected to reach 7TWh/year by 2030, from 2022’s 2TWh/year. Why? Demand, from all the fucking electric vehicles because we’re going to run out of fossil fuels soon. Not technological advances.
Similarly, iron air batteries were tested by Westinghouse in the 70s, and are currently being brought to market. As far as I can tell, there has been little improvements to the technology to make it commercially viable, other than demand. You know, from all the fucking data centers going in.
Hell, let’s go back to Germany. They have double the wind capacity as they do solar? Why? Demand. Because Germany focused on wind as being the premier renewable energy, not solar. It wasn’t until recently that they created programs to increase demand of solar.
The grid is an infrastructure project. As such, we don’t need to rely on batteries. We can use infrastructure projects, such as reservoirs, for energy storage. And in the US, we’ve been using this method since 1930. I know what youre thinking, “In northern Europe we can’t do that!” But alas, Switzerland did it in 1909. And pumped storage hydropower achieves 70-80% efficiency, which is pretty fucking good. And let’s be real, if your grid isn’t diversified enough where that’s a problem, then that’s a problem with your grid and your incompetent policy makers, not the tech. Or there’s an issue with electric demand, which is a failure of your politicians not keeping the Pedophile Class in line.
The reason energy storage for the grid is a problem now is because we didn’t invest in production 30 years ago. Not because the research was behind. It’s because politicians and the pedophile class failed us.
You are failing the future with the bullshit that you are spouting. Just a parrot of the pedophile class.
Research, knowledge, and tech is not restricting energy storage.
Politicians and the pedophile elite are.
Add “hot sand” to your storage options friend. It’s shockingly efficient for storing thermal energy, which can be used directly for vast swathes of industrial processes, and with the addition of the oldie but goodie “turbine and steam”…
😂😂😂 hot sands in the US. As if we have a use for thermal energy, that’d imply that we had centralized cooling on more than just universities. This is America.
But seriously, hot sands are hella cool and I’m jelly of yinz.
deleted by creator
At least some pyros from the Romanian navy have fun … 🎆🔥
Call it the Blew(up) Danube?
Meanwhile I want to nuke one measly hurricane and everyone looses their minds
When you hit rock bottom, that’s at least the point, where yo-…hm, wait a second…
so, like, black sabbath? or something harder that the kids today listen to?
ITT: Gas and oil simps
Astroturfing bots
Where?
