Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · 2 months ago

Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers'

fortune.com

external-link
message-square
61
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
163
external-link

Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers'

fortune.com

Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) MA to Technology · 2 months ago
message-square
61
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
Top economist warns that the AI math doesn’t make sense: 'Profits are currently being funded by investors rather than earned from customers' | Fortune
fortune.com
external-link
The AI boom has turned the standard profit margin model on its head, according to Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok—and it’s making the industry’s growth unsustainable.
  • kittenroar ( kittenroar@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sam Altman and others have publicly stated (something to the effect that) the end goal is for AI to replace workers. There is no amount of money too big for a capitalist to bet on that outcome, especially if they deem it plausible.

    • AMoralNihilist ( AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      And then who buys the products 🫠

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝 ( HK65@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        They buy products from each other, and shut out more and more people if society.

        You see the homeless drug addict on the street? They want more of that.

        • qyron ( qyron@sopuli.xyz ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They buy products from each other and shut themselves from society.

          Which is not a bad outcome.

          • ignirtoq ( ignirtoq@feddit.online ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Except they take all of the land and resources with them. You posit the billionaires have a fully automated robotic industry at their whim and they will leave any scraps for the rest of us? It would be judgment day from the Terminator series, except instead of a super intelligent Skynet AGI mowing down humanity it would be psychopathic pedophiles.

      • partofthevoice ( partofthevoice@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exchange still occurs globally and amongst the upper class.

        • Rivalarrival ( Rivalarrival@lemmy.today ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The upper class doesn’t buy anything but stocks.

          • obviouspornalt ( obviouspornalt@fedinsfw.app ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            don’t be so narrow minded. they also buy yachts and real estate and politicians.

            • Rivalarrival ( Rivalarrival@lemmy.today ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              They don’t buy enough yachts and private jets and other manufactured property that would put a worker to work to produce it.

              I would argue that “Real Estate” and “Politicians” are de facto “stocks”.

      • PRIMEcavitationfetishist ( PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        When we only have white cishet billionaires, we can abolish money.

        • TehPers ( TehPers@beehaw.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Don’t forget about the other big players! Jensen Hwang, Lisa Su, Lip-Bu Tan, Satya Nadella, plus the memory cartel (Samsung, SK Hynix, etc.)

          This particular war is a class war.

          • PRIMEcavitationfetishist ( PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah, so, about them…

            • TehPers ( TehPers@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sorry, forgot about a few. Sam Altman, Sundar Pichai… Honestly, it’d probably be easier to list the white cishet billionaires in tech than it would be to list the exceptions. There’s tons of them outside of tech, probably the majority tbh, but within tech it’s far too diverse.

        • NigelFrobisher ( NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Without the carrot there’s only the stick…

      • chicken ( chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just imagine a world in which the only products manufactured are exclusively chasing the dollars of wealthy investors. So like yachts, custom giant statues, kill drone perimeters, etc.

    • Tollana1234567 ( Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      what he isnt saying, is AI needs to be profitable for it to happen, it hasnt.

    • TQuid ( TQuid@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s an excellent way to think about it. I mean, horrifying, but incisive.

Technology

technology

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 163 users / day
  • 1.05K users / week
  • 2.2K users / month
  • 5.22K users / 6 months
  • 5.11K local subscribers
  • 43.6K subscribers
  • 6.39K Posts
  • 107K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Chris Remington ( remington@beehaw.org ) 
  • alyaza [they/she] ( alyaza@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org ) 
  • gyrfalcon ( gyrfalcon@beehaw.org ) 
  • rs5th ( rs5th@beehaw.org ) 
  • coldredlight ( coldredlight@beehaw.org ) 
  • Leigh ( SemioticStandard@beehaw.org ) 
  • TheRtRevKaiser ( TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code