Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sunshine ( Sunshine@piefed.ca )  to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 months ago

Harry Potter star Bel Powley says she 'strongly disagrees' with JK Rowling's views

www.thepinknews.com

external-link
message-square
35
link
fedilink
72
external-link

Harry Potter star Bel Powley says she 'strongly disagrees' with JK Rowling's views

www.thepinknews.com

Sunshine ( Sunshine@piefed.ca )  to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 months ago
message-square
35
link
fedilink
Harry Potter star Bel Powley 'strongly disagrees' with JK Rowling
www.thepinknews.com
external-link
Bel Powley, who will play Aunt Petunia in HBO's Harry Potter, has said she "strongly disagrees" with JK Rowling's views on gender.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Archangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fuck all these sell-out assholes, pretending like their opinions matter, when they’re still willing to work for her.

    • Curiositymonger ( Curiositymonger@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yet her saying this would be noticed by many Harry Potter fans and hopefully make them think. While not taking the role would not communicate anything to the fans

      • Archangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personally, I’d be much more interested to hear from actors that turned down roles like this, rather than from the ones still profiting from them.

        • 𝙈𝙞𝙖 ( Quokka@quokk.au ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 months ago

          I posted this in !tvmovies@lemmy.dbzer0.com earlier.


          Queer Director Ally Pankiw Shows Turning Down Harry Potter Is as Simple as One Text

          The director tells Them that the idea of J.K. Rowling being mad at her is “wild” but “also kinda thrilling.”

          • Archangel1313 ( Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            See? Now that’s the shit I’m talking about. That’s integrity. Good for her.

      • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc) ( flamingos@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Every Harry Potter fan I’ve met already prerequisites any talk of the franchise with ‘I don’t agree with Rowling, but…’, they already know, they’d just rather support the eradication of trans people than give up their children’s toys.

        • Curiositymonger ( Curiositymonger@reddthat.com ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Children generally don’t have a clear and settled opinion on trans rights. This actress saying she doesn’t agree with Rowling can make them think, so it is useful for trans rights that she said this

        • MolochHorridus ( MolochHorridus@piefed.social ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If only they didn’t buy more of that Potter crap be it physical or digital.

  • ordnance_qf_17_pounder ( ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    Then don’t accept the role. Put your money where your mouth is. Coward.

    • corbindallas ( corbindallas@fedinsfw.app ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      she put her mouth directly on rowlings asshole

    • ohulancutash ( ohulancutash@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hope you did full diligence on your employers board of directors.

      • gedfromgont ( gedfromgont@piefed.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        I must have missed the post where ordnance_qf_17_pounder called out his board of directors publicly on their behaviour.

  • Sharkticon ( Sharkticon@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    Still planning on cashing them checks though ain’t ya Bel?

  • Avicenna ( Avicenna@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    if you are so opposed perhaps you should organise a strike with your coworkers until they introduce a cool trans character into the series. Then watch rowling foam like a rabid rowling.

    • NigelFrobisher ( NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even if they did, she’d still use the profits to attack human rights organisations.

    • dev_null ( dev_null@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The video game had trans characters. But hardly anyone was ever mentioning that because the boycott was louder.

      • kuiskaaja ( kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

  • TribblesBestFriend ( TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    « I strongly disagree with her … I’ll still play to make her some more money »

    I understand that capitalism is dehumanizing us but this piece make me sad

  • CerebralHawks ( cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sounds like they should cancel the series, since it primarily exists to distance Rowling from the naysayers who were in the movies. Now that those in the series are also opposed to her views… what’s even the point anymore?

    • Pennywise ( Pennywise@quokk.au ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      The primary existence is easy money.

    • Lodespawn ( Lodespawn@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think the need to make her cash cow make more cash overrides her need to push her shitty views on other people. That said maybe she plans on making the cash cow do both with the upcoming series, I guess only the people who actually watch it will be the ones to find out.

      • CerebralHawks ( cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fair point. A part of me does want to watch the series, because I was a fan of the books and the movies way back when (before JK Rowling was a dumpster fire). There’s a reason I haven’t bought the movies on Blu-ray/4K. Or the new audiobooks (I don’t have the old ones, either.) And why I won’t be watching the show. I did buy the game, Hogwarts Legacy, on Xbox, on a fire sale, it was like ten bucks. The one with a trans character in Hogsmeade that takes place like 100 years before Voldemort’s birth. Pretty sure JK Rowling does not approve of that game.

        • Lodespawn ( Lodespawn@aussie.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah it’s annoying that she couldn’t help herself but use her fame and fortune to push a shitty bigoted opinion. Her books brought so much joy to so many but her opinions have really tainted everything’s she’s touched.

          • CerebralHawks ( cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Right. It’s like Orson Scott Card. The guy’s a homophobic POS IRL, but his book Ender’s Game is about a boy who gets bullied, he rises above it and becomes an intergalactic hero. And then you find out the author is one of the bullies. Sigh.

            • Lodespawn ( Lodespawn@aussie.zone ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              My only experience of ender’s Game was the movie and hot damm the movie was a hot piece of boring garbage. Is the book actually good, I see it on lists of sci-fi must read but the movie has really tainted the idea of reading it for me.

              • CerebralHawks ( cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                I liked the movie. Watched it twice. Bought it on iTunes. Then I read the book. I still think the movie is okay, but I can’t bring myself to watch it.

                The book isn’t exactly phenomenal, but the movie didn’t nail it. Card was right when he said the audiobook was the peak adaptation and they would never make a great movie from it. The book was better than the movie, just for what the movie got wrong or missed.

                Read the book if you like the idea behind the movie. The book has the same exact idea. If you didn’t like the idea, the book probably won’t win you over.

                The two big changes I remember is, one, Ender was like 5 or 6 in the book, they had to age him up for the movie. Same with the other kids. They were actual children, not teenagers, not “17 is a whole ass child” children, they were actual school-age children, zero thoughts of hooking up or anything like that… little kids. For better or worse. Big babies. And that was the point, Card was suggesting that older kids or teenagers would not be suitable for the programme because, well, if you remember the ending, the book does the same thing. And two, there was a lot more focus on Ender’s family back home and the life they lived and the system of government they lived under. I believe the ruling body(ies?) on Earth played a bigger role in the later books. But what was going on back home was a bigger deal in the book where the movie focused almost exclusively on the space camp/battle school or whatever it was called (it’s been years).

                • Lodespawn ( Lodespawn@aussie.zone ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Hrmm interesting I thought the concept in the movie was fine, I thought the execution and focus on the space camp nonsense was … well … nonsense. Sounds like the book might be worth a read. To be fair thats usually the case, movie adaptations almost always need to cripple the original text to shoehorn it into the medium.

    • Tollana1234567 ( Tollana1234567@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      and i heard she is trying to retcon the og actors, and the series with her views.

  • Rothe ( Rothe@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not that “strongly” obviously.

  • NigelFrobisher ( NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is like you should feel ok watching the new series because some of the staff are conscientious wage slaves rather than full-on fascist bootlickers.

  • quill7513 ( quill7513@anarchist.nexus ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Then don’t take the role. Don’t participate in Harry Potter (Joanna’s Version). Don’t feed the machine

  • Pennywise ( Pennywise@quokk.au ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    It kind of seems like if a vegan worked on a CAFO and processed livestock for slaughter …

    Virtue jerking is funny.

  • Ricky Rigatoni ( RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Okay so that’s why I don’t recognize her. She’s not a star from Harry Potter the movies, she’s a star from the soon to be released TV series Harry Potter which I guess it going to be a redo of the adaptabarationisms.

  • Janx ( Janx@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re partnering with the transphobe to make money! That’s wrong, despite your opinion…

  • osanna ( osanna@lemmy.vg ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Sunshine ( Sunshine@piefed.ca ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Boycott bigots!

United Kingdom@feddit.uk

unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 311 users / day
  • 682 users / week
  • 1.38K users / month
  • 3.47K users / 6 months
  • 90 local subscribers
  • 7.03K subscribers
  • 4.56K Posts
  • 16.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • tom ( tom@feddit.uk ) 
  • GreatAlbatross ( GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk ) 
  • frankPodmore ( frankPodmore@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code