Last year in August 2025, I published my article Jews are NOT Oppressed: The Myth of Systemic Antisemitism. In it, I included an exhaustive list of polling data I gathered from around the internet on the opinion of Jews worldwide towards Israel. Most of the surveys were conducted after the start of the 2023 Gaza genocide. The results showed consistent and overwhelming support for Israel among the global Jewish population, with a rough weighted total average of over 85%.
In this article, I decided to go through newer polling data released since August 2025 to see if things have changed a year after I published my initial findings. Below is a summary of results from surveys I found of American, Canadian, British and Israeli Jews in descending order of recency.
The results show that while favorability toward Israel has declined compared to previous years, it remains in the majority across all countries. A majority of Jews polled also do not even consider Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute a genocide. Most importantly, the question at the core of Zionism—whether Israel should exist as a Jewish state—still commands overwhelming approval.
Israel’s Right to Exist as a Jewish State • US: 72-87% support Israel’s right to exist; 66-83% say denying this is antisemitic.
• UK: 81-82% support its right to exist.
• Canada: 92% support its right to exist.
• Israel: 87% say Zionism is not racist; 85% identify as Zionist; 1% as Anti-Zionist.
Attachment to & Favorability of Israel:
• US: 55-71% have a favorable view or feel emotionally attached to Israel; 63% say supporting Israel is important to their Jewish identity; 70-83% view Israeli people favorably.
• UK: 75% feel emotionally attached.
• Canada: 69% feel emotionally attached. Views on the Gaza War & Genocide
• US: 73% say Israel’s immediate response to Oct. 7 was justified; 42-46% say ongoing operations are justified; 49-78% deny genocide.
• UK: 81% deny genocide.
• Canada: 70% say Israel’s actions are legal/legitimate; 87-90% deny genocide; 64% do not blame Israel for famine.
• Israel: 71-92% rate the IDF highly; 68% want Israel to stay in Gaza; 61% deny famine reports.
Aid & Arms to Israel:
• US: Only 26% support stopping financial and military assistance; 59% support sending more arms.
• Canada: Only 20% support an arms embargo on Israel; 71% support increased aid to Israeli civil society. Antisemitism & Anti-Zionism
• US: 83% say too many critics of Israel use antisemitic tropes; 38-54% view certain anti-Israel actions as antisemitic; 89% say anti-Zionism is linked to antisemitism.
• Canada: 45% say calling Israel "apartheid” is definitely antisemitic; 45% say calling it “genocide” is definitely antisemitic.
• Israel: 78% say anti-Zionism is linked to antisemitism; 68% say boycotts are antisemitic.
Based on the latest polling evidence, little has fundamentally changed. While favorability toward Israel and approval of its conduct have shifted somewhat, overall support for Israel—particularly its status as a “Jewish state”—remains nearly unchanged, with the vast majority of Jews continuing to back the Zionist project, even as they express reservations about its current government.
So one must ask: given the facts presented here—nearly three years into a genocide carried out by the “Jewish state,” by Jews, for Jews, at the expense of non-Jews, with the overwhelming support of Jews worldwide—why does the Western “pro-Palestine” movement spend so much time and energy doing free PR for Jews? Why go so far as to lie on their behalf about what they actually believe? The Western left loves to talk about “centring voices.” Well, this is what they’ve said. So why speak over them?
It might be worth emphasizing that in USA the vast majority of zionists are christian.
Certainly but they can’t colonize Palestine.
why not?
Because they’re not Jewish and Israel is a Jewish ethnostate. This is what happens to Christians there https://lemmy.ml/post/51945225
Israel is only a “Jewish Ethnostate” because it was supported in that sense by the non-Jewish Zionist west, particularly The UK and US, which are dominated by Christian Zionists. The UK and US had no problem colonizing other places without Zionist Jews, including all surrounding colonial states and they could colonize Palestine without them too if they wanted to (but they don’t want to because they are Zionists).
Absolutely not. Israel is a Jewish ethnostate because a very dedicated Jewish Zionist community used significant wealth and influence to market themselves as a useful tool for Western interests for the specific purpose of wanting to create a Jewish ethnostate. Such as the Rotschilds with Balfour.
That’s not to say that they did it all by themselves. They always try to align themselves with others, usually the absolute worst people. The Havaara agreement with Hitler. Selling weapons to Apartheid South Africa, the genocide in Bosnia and every other genocide you can think of. Their current allegiance with Gulf, the USA, blood diamond dictators in Africa etcetera. Similarly their lobby group always tries to align with others. Like Evangelical Christians and even their own non-Zionist Jewish community has been almost completely converted to Zionism over the past century.
You are correct that the USA and other have colonized other places but Palestine was specifically a Zionist Jewish incentive and to this day only Jews can go colonize Palestine.
Your history is not quite accurate here. British political Evangelical Zionism predates Jewish Zionism as major political movement by a couple of generations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church's_Ministry_Among_Jewish_People
Jewish political Zionism was instituted by western, rich, assimlitaed Jews who allied themselves with Christian Zionists beginning in the 1880s and 1890s, not the other way around. The Balfour Declaration bears the name of its virulently antisemtic author who wanted to solve the Jewish Question through deportation of English Jews to Palestine, and passed the declaration over the objection of the only Jewish member of the cabinet. It also aligned nicely with the colonial regime being instituted in the former Ottoman territories where the British and French installed loyal minorities (and often alien) as the rulers of the new states, with Zionist Jews serving that role in Palestine.
The Jewish-supremacist state that has evolved out of that project has certainly done all of the terrible things you say (and then some). And the current laws of the state limit those who can colonize Palestine to those it deems to be “Jews” (which includes most Christian converts and does not include anti-Zionist Jews).
I think where you and I differ is about who is ultimately in control. The idea that the settler colonial project could last a week without total support from the non-Jewish Zionist states is not correct. It only has the power to do what it does to the extent its Sponsor (the Anglo-American Empire in this case) sees supporting it is in the Sponsor’s best interest. The military and political leadership of the US has long said that “if there wasn’t an Israel in the Middle East, we would have to create one” because of the interests of the US, not the Jews. It’s a “permanent air craft carrier” in the Middle East, which must be controlled because of the world’s petroleum-based economy and dollar system.
I think why I’m harping on it is because the Zionist Jews are the tip of the spear for the project, just like the convicts in Australia, the non-Anglican Protestants (and all of their enslaved Africans) in what became the 13 US colonies, and, most recently, the “migrants” in North Africa being sent into Spanish territory. But focusing on the tip of the spear can make one lose focus of the thrower of the spear, which will happily make a new spear and a new tip once the old one is used up.
British Zionism does predate it but the idea of creating a Jewish ethnostate was just appealing to some Jews which then decided to implement that.
The Balfour declaration was because of large money donations and loans from the Rotschilds to the British. Which gets obvious when you see whom it is addressed to
Similar with Zionist Jews collaboration with the Nazis they saw a chance to collaborate with a party to further their own agenda at the cost of non-Zionist Jews.
But focusing on the tip of the spear can make one lose focus of the thrower of the spear
But this is incorrect. Israel has swapped allegiance between imperialist countries many times and done plenty of realignment. From Britain to France to America to whatever superpower they can align with next. Whenever the US goes down Israel will gladly switch to align more with Russia or any other party willing to collaborate with it. Organizations like AIPAC do not exist to serve imperial interest nor does Israel. Just look at the Iran war for that. The US is destroying itself for Israel.
Deleted by the author for privacy scraping purposes
Jewish is not an ethnicity. Saying it is is just Zionist propaganda. And “Ethnostate” is a term that I don’t like (“Nation-State” is right there). That’s why, as I said below, the Israeli state will accept Christian converts to Judaism and not people who were born Jews but are anti-Zionist. You can’t convert to a new ethnicity, but you can convert to being Jewish and accepted as an “Israeli” citizen.
Without Christians zionism would still be trying to do genocide and settler colonialism with the excuse of the holocaust and Jewish safety and so on. Without Jews there would be no zionism and it would simply be naked colonialism with no excuses or pretexts, no ability to call opposition racist, etc, which would be hard to sell to the western public in this day and age. Jews are the load bearing column in zionism that enable it.
which would be hard to sell to the western public in this day and age. Jews are the load bearing column in zionism that enable it.
The part that provides the propaganda aspect is more load bearing than the part that provides material support and shittons of weapons?
It’s already a hard sell as is, and the unpopularity of it is not stopping or slowing down the arms shipments or interfering with the colonial project. Finding another justification for colonialism is not nearly as difficult as trying to do colonialism without a clear material advantage against the colonized people.
It’s painful to look at my copy of Maus. Nothing was learned. And Spiegelman is very omissive, like a smarter zionist would be.
i do not think spiegalman is a Zionist. do you know something i don’t? His recent works are about Palestine, and he has been very critical of Israel
I dunno, I recall the interview with Joe Sacco, who was way more outspoken in criticizing Israel. Then no positioning through media. Maybe I’m being unfair and he just doesn’t get the spotlight when his stance is more critical.
this feels really troubling and i wonder if it’s because they’re ignorant of what colonialism did in the past?
As an antizionist Jew who grew up in the Midwest, I’m fairly confident that its the immense amount of Israeli propaganda being shoved down the faces of young Jews at youth groups, Summer camps, ‘Hebrew’ classrooms.
Thinking back to the BS we were taught when I was young is horrifying. It’s really shameful.
deleted by creator
Yep, sorry my initial reply was from my phone and I was struggling with how much to add. United States > Midwest.
I’m going to answer them without spoiler, in order. And with the HUGE caveat that I do not speak for all Jewish people.
- Do you attend religious events?
- Yes, but I want to clarify that ‘religion’ is not necessarily ‘faith.’ I think this is difficult for many US Christians to get.
- I attend occasional synagogue events (at a very progressive synagogue), holiday events with my friends/family, and charity-style work with local orgs (elder-care, child-care, and nature cleanup)
- Are those synagogue[s] or organization[s] anti-‘Israel’ (not just antizionist)?
- This is a really good question, and unfortunately it depends on the semantics. And even many individuals would define antizionism differently - against the formation/creation and actions of the state of Israel, against the existence of Israel, or against the concept of a Jewish Ethno-state. A combination of those with other perspectives.
- Some organizations in the area are explicitly against Israel’s actions, some are vocal about it, and others are quieter to prevent being silenced. Some orgs try to balance the line with a 2-state-solution style JStreet perspective. Others just parrot the propaganda, and I either stay away from those orgs or try to have discussions with some of the leaders in non-public spaces.
- Are the other participants extremist zionist or liberal zionists?
- Again, I hate to be all WhAt Do YoU mEaN bY…, but if we’re saying a liberal zionist is someone who is generally liberal / progressive on things except Israel, that’s like 65% of the Jewish zionists here. If you’re saying a liberal zionist is someone who only kinda supports Israel, that may also overlap with the previous 65% by a lot. There aren’t a lot of extremist zionists if that means blindly supporting Israel with everything, believing Israel’s right to exist supersedes everything else. But the few who are tend to be the rare Jewish republican / Trumper. The remaining quarter or so are progressives who are either anti-Israel / anti-zionist or didn’t have strong thoughts on it until Oct 7 and now likely lean towards the Palestinian cause.
- Are some of them ex-idf members there?
- I don’t know any former IDF anymore. There used to be a push to bring them around to spread propaganda.
- I went to a Combatants for Peace event last year, which had some former militants. It’s an organization that certainly has its own issues, but ultimately has a goal of building community and caring for each other, regardless of identity.
I’ll end with one last thing:
- For the MOST part, young Jews growing up in my area (under 40ish) are far more progressive on Israel than the older generations. Giving hope to a community of Jewish people who understand the atrocities that our people endured (often our grandparents, including mine) should not be acted upon any people, for any reason. That The Holocaust didn’t have the only way to cause a genocide; and that Israel’s (and US’s) actions in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Jordan is also a genocide and should be stopped.
Dang that’s a wall of text, sorry. **Also, edited some formatting because bulleted lists are tough
Deleted by the author for privacy scraping purposes
- Do you attend religious events?
I think it’s mainly indoctrination
@Malyca @eldavi
Four decades ago, a New York Jewish historian wrote this:
https://web.archive.org/web/20171228212521/https://www.wrmea.org/1985-may-27/the-fate-of-author-of-fate.html
What Jewish communities truly think today, we may never know. The Zionist establishment has too much of a chokehold.How can the Jewish diaspora be liberated from their Zionist oppressors?
#Zionism #Israel #genocide
i guess it’s further proof that the upcoming age verification laws are going work when it comes to preventing young people from learning about the next gaza situation.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
This sort of approach is a really dangerous way of thinking because it’s literally stereotyping just based on statistical majorities.
I was born and raised in Tennessee, a deep red state that voted for Trump by a nearly 2/3 majority in 2024. However, even in such an environment, one in three Tennesseans is still a significant number of people. There are several cities in the state where the demographics lean in the opposite direction, to say nothing of specific circles. I was reluctant to leave the state because I had several friend groups with actually cool people, many of them queer, and finding such people can be a breath of fresh air, and a reassurance of sanity.
If you were to conduct a similar analysis of Tennesseans you would no doubt conclude that we are “NOT oppressed” because there are strong majorities that support right-wing politics. And if the point of your analysis is just to show broad trends, then sure. My home is an absolute cesspool of reaction, I won’t deny that. But you’d also be ignoring the experiences of minority groups and voices that just happen to be included in that label by accident of birth. I think that if someone were to label me a dumb hick or redneck or whatever based on that, they’d be out of line.
The point isn’t my specific example but that I think just about everyone belongs to some demographic group where the majority in said group has problematic views. When I see a group like the Jewish Voices for Peace going against the majority view, I can connect that to my own experiences being outspoken in the South, and I think it’s worth recognizing and celebrating them.
The distinction between Jews and Zionists is also important for political reasons. If the problem is people being Zionists, that is something that they can change, and it’s a political project that can be subverted in any number of ways. If the problem is people being Jews, they can’t stop being Jewish. So what solution does that imply? In addition to including people it shouldn’t, talking about Jews rather than Zionists also lets non-Jewish Zionists off the hook, for similarly no reason except accident of birth.
On the other hand, what are the advantages of ditching the distinction? Satisfying some people’s base urges to be more discriminatory and inflammatory? As far as I’m concerned, the sort of person who needs to be disciplined on that point is already dangerous and unreliable, and this sort of “populist” tendency to redirect class analysis to racial bullshit needs to be nipped in the bud immediately and consistently.
My home is an absolute cesspool of reaction, I won’t deny that. But you’d also be ignoring the experiences of minority groups and voices that just happen to be included in that label by accident of birth.
Ok? Who cares? If you’re born in Nazi Germany why try to save the German reputation when most of them are literal Nazis. I’ll be the first to throw my country under the bus instead of trying to defend it if it does bad stuff just because I was born there.
As I’ve explained plenty below it’s also dangerous to keep denying the very strong links between Judaism and Zionism because Zionists are able to use their Jewish institutions like Synagogues to sell stolen Palestinian land and then get defended by “anti-Zionists” who will tell you there is no link between Judaism and Zionism.
Furthermore anti-Zionist Jews have directly massively damaged the Palestine movement by going on witch-hunts against prominent voices such as Jeremy Corbyn and even Palestinians who suffered the gencocide for not adhering to their language standards. Placing their attempt to save the Jewish reputation above the active genocide of Palestinians.
On the other hand, what are the advantages of ditching the distinction?
Calling them Zionists or even Zionist Jews is fine in my bood. The problem is people policing the anti-Israel movement and doing infighting for the reputation of Judaism when someone doesn’t adhere to that distinction.
Here if you want to hear if from a Jew: Yes, All Jews. All Jews must kill Zionism within Judaism
I’ll be the first to throw my country under the bus instead of trying to defend it if it does bad stuff just because I was born there.
I think you’re confused. That’s the position I’m arguing for. I already said that my home state is a reactionary cesspool, in the same way that Israel is. Because the country is so shit, I believe we should denounce it and throw it under the bus by correctly labelling it with the term “Zionist.” You are arguing against that position, and, rather than throwing the country under the bus, are throwing a race under the bus.
As I’ve explained plenty below it’s also dangerous to keep denying the very strong links between Judaism and Zionism because Zionists are able to use their Jewish institutions like Synagogues to sell stolen Palestinian land and then get defended by “anti-Zionists” who will tell you there is no link between Judaism and Zionism.
A chud will see some evil corporation doing pinkwashing and conclude from that they need to hate queer people, this is the same mentality. Zionists use Judaism as a cover, and sometimes they are able to get away with it, and in cases where there’s ambiguity it may be unwise to force the issue from the perspective of optics.
But by equating them, you’re just playing straight into their rhetoric and giving them exactly what they want. Again, for no reason other than wanting to sound edgy.
Furthermore anti-Zionist Jews have directly massively damaged the Palestine movement by going on witch-hunts against prominent voices such as Jeremy Corbyn
When did “anti-Zionist Jews” go on a witch-hunt against Corbyn? Because I distinctly remember Zionists, Jewish and otherwise, conducting said witch-hunt. Corbyn was quite clear on distinguishing his criticism for the Israeli state from Jews in general, so the people who had a problem with that were Zionists almost by definition.
Placing their attempt to save the Jewish reputation
Who on earth said anything about “saving the Jewish reputation?” What I’m concerned about is subverting and coopting a movement by taking it completely off-message from the very clearly correct position of “The state of Israel is bad because it’s doing genocide” into this racial bullshit for, again, no fucking reason except that being in the position of the good guy apparently makes you uncomfortable somehow. And I’m just saying, tough shit, get it together.
It’s so dumb from every perspective. First off it’s just factually inaccurate, but it’s also just horrendous optics, it goes against any ideology we’d want to build a movement around, it legitimizes the rhetoric of both fascists and Zionists, and again, it’s a completely unforced error on your part that serves no actual purpose.
What I’m concerned about is subverting and coopting a movement by taking it completely off-message from the very clearly correct position of “The state of Israel is bad because it’s doing genocide” into this racial bullshit for, again, no fucking reason except that being in the position of the good guy apparently makes you uncomfortable somehow. And I’m just saying, tough shit, get it together.
Cool I’m worried about the Palestinians actually being genocided right now. The fictional threat you’re talking about is going on the backburner. You’re doing the “all lives matter” thing. I recommend reading the article I linked if you still don’t understand it.
Cool, so you’re not concerned about whether the movement to stop the Palestinians from being genocided right now is actually effective or not.
I stg. Fascists are out there cooking up all sorts of inventive ways to sell horrible shit to suburban housewives, playing the propaganda game with shit like “it’s ok to be white” and meanwhile leftists are brainstorming all sorts of ways to take actually good things and dress them up in the most alienating dogshit way possible so that no one wants to be on our side, and we get to be in the super special club, grandstanding all to ourselves while nothing fucking changes.
Distinguishing between a state and an ethnicity is not and never will be “doing the all lives matter thing.”
I’m starting to think you’re a Zionist since you really like policing the Palestine movement on tone.
Here’s a 50 minute extended in-depth explanation of how you are hurting the Palestine movement.
You’re allowed to learn from it or I’ll just block you
No, I’m not policing “the Palestinian movement” on tone, I’m policing you on doing your level best to muddy the waters on a black-and-white issue.
If you’re gonna block me for not denouncing an ethnicity, then go right ahead. Just remember that that is the line that you’ve chosen to draw.
I’m completely opposed to the genocidal, apartheid state of Israel, I am not opposed to Jews existing.
If that’s such an odious position to you that you can’t stand hearing my perspective, then you’re clearly lost and likely a couple years out at best from dropping any kind of pretense of being a leftist anyway.
Lol, a BadEmpanda video. Yeah, that checks out, that’s where you picked up the brainworms. Edgy bullshit and controversy bait, I’m familiar enough with him to know that’s what he does. Those sorts of takes are great for social media engagement, bad for actually being true or accomplishing anything.
Understood you’re unwilling to learn anything and you’re here to support genocide and refuse to educate yourself on anything beyond your Liberal-Zionist beliefs which you want to tone-police on.
Blocked.
This does not surprise me at all. Serbs have the same attitude regarding their shit that happened not too long ago. Ethnic wars are really something else. People switch off their intelligence and go with the crowd.
Palestinians are surprisingly reasonable towards Jews compared to how extremely unreasonable most Jews are towards them.
Hmm. My impression on Oct 7 was that there was some schadenfreude going on. Which isn’t excuse for anything. More of a sign that diplomacy should be pursued whenever possible.
The one with 3% children killed?
My impression was a resistance force fighting to liberate their homeland and targeting military bases while making distinction between innocents and terrorist occupiers.
@majster @geneva_convenience Remeber of the Gleiwitz incident…
I’m always confused about the “so what” of articles like this. What is the actual political program that follows from these findings? The article’s conclusion talks about the “Western left” changing its approach to “centering voices”. Okay. So what does that mean practically for the left? Are they arguing for decentering Jewish anti-Zionist voices as “non representative”? Like, what’s the actual ask here, what’s the program?
